The Thriller
Well-Known Member
Smart for bogey? No
Smart for Clarkson? Hell yes
Smart for Clarkson? Hell yes
I say trading high because trading Bojan next summer is trading an expiring contract.I don’t think Smart for Bojan is trading high though… it’s fair but I don’t expect Bojan to drop off at all. Could he get hurt? Sure… any player can get hurt. Smart has struggled more with injuries and that contract carries significant risk. I’d want more in a bogey for smart swap… they have to help us move JC and his deal or give us something that we can use to partially fill the hole Bogey would leave.
I just don’t know about this one.
You can’t just go trading every player because their value due to contract will go up and down.I say trading high because trading Bojan next summer is trading an expiring contract.
I don't think he really declines any, but his value in relation to contract does go down if we wait until the summer or next deadline
Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
ConleyIf the Jazz can get Smart for Clarkson then how do we get a Jerami Grant, Christian Wood, John Collins player without giving up bogey? Is that even possible? I feel like Smart for Clarkson is a huge step in the right direction but we still need a player like the aforementioned.
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
Please don't take me out of context.You can’t just go trading every player because their value due to contract will go up and down.
He took the pills but they were actually suppositories.Somebody either didn’t take their pills or took too many.
Please, God, I really don’t ask for much.Interesting analysis here (Clarkson for Smart and a 2nd):
![]()
Boston Celtics Rumors: 2 potential Marcus Smart trades
The Boston Celtics are reportedly looking to move anyone not named Jayson Tatum & Jaylen Brown. Here are 2 potential trades involving Marcus Smart.chowderandchampions.com
Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
What exactly do you think we can get for him that’s more valuable to the team? I’m confused?Please don't take me out of context.
I said if we do trade Bojan for Smart, as reported, we are trading Bojan at a point of high value. I say that because we should demand more for him due to his value.
Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
Sorry if I was confusing.What exactly do you think we can get for him that’s more valuable to the team? I’m confused?
i don't think we'd need to at that point, Smart would improve the situation that much. Integrating two starter level players right before the playoffs would be really rough as wellIf the Jazz can get Smart for Clarkson then how do we get a Jerami Grant, Christian Wood, John Collins player without giving up bogey? Is that even possible? I feel like Smart for Clarkson is a huge step in the right direction but we still need a player like the aforementioned.
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
If the Jazz can get Smart for Clarkson then how do we get a Jerami Grant, Christian Wood, John Collins player without giving up bogey? Is that even possible? I feel like Smart for Clarkson is a huge step in the right direction but we still need a player like the aforementioned.
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
I’m sorry but if you think trading Bogey for smart and another player is a good idea, unless that player is Brown, and that obviously isn’t happening the team is much worse.Sorry if I was confusing.
I was saying that Bojan has a ton of value right now. He's shooting well and he's on a strong contract. He's a great 3rd scoring option and floor spreader.
Smart doesn't come in with that sort of value. His fit is in question and his contract might not be considered fantastic.
If we do this trade, we should expect more from Boston.
Sent from my SM-A516U using JazzFanz mobile app
Let’s just stop with the Collins talk. 1. We don’t have the assets for him. 2. He’s what I call fake gold. Nice and shiny, looks valuable but dime a dozen IMO. He doesn’t play defense or any form of winning basketballJoe, Royce and multiple picks. I don't think you'd get John Collins normally, but that might work for Wood or Barnes if the picks are good enough. Keep in mind Sacramento and Houston are primarily interested in draft capital for their vets.
Probably not as old my man, nice fantasy though.So Daryl Morey gave an interview where he said he'd take a top 40 player for Ben Simmons. Technically, Mike Conley is a top-40 player.
I wonder how the Jazz feel about Simmons these days.
WowSo Daryl Morey gave an interview where he said he'd take a top 40 player for Ben Simmons. Technically, Mike Conley is a top-40 player.
I wonder how the Jazz feel about Simmons these days.
I'd take PJ Washington over all these guys. Not a better player necessarily, but he's a buy low that we can certainly afford. To get Wood, Barnes or Collins, we have to overpay which may result in us going backwards.Joe, Royce and multiple picks. I don't think you'd get John Collins normally, but that might work for Wood or Barnes if the picks are good enough. Keep in mind Sacramento and Houston are primarily interested in draft capital for their vets.
you'd take that deal in a heartbeat. It's on Philly to accept it.So Daryl Morey gave an interview where he said he'd take a top 40 player for Ben Simmons. Technically, Mike Conley is a top-40 player.
I wonder how the Jazz feel about Simmons these days.