Muslims are masters of apologetics.
Being religious, of course they are.
Muslims are masters of apologetics.
PS, the link that One Brow posted is quite the poor one. If you click on the hyperlinked excerpts, the words are taken from a flawed english translation of the koran, and even the excerpts are paraphrased poorly, in my opinion.
The LDS church says that Native Americans are from Israel. DNA evidence clearly states that they are from ASIA of arctic Mongoloid origin. I mean, after reading that, it is pretty convincing that the LDS church does not comply with science.
The LDS church states that having black skin is a curse of god. The LDS church says that Native Americans are from Israel. DNA evidence clearly states that they are from ASIA of arctic Mongoloid origin. I mean, after reading that, it is pretty convincing that the LDS church does not comply with science.
I normally don't like throwing religions under the bus but since this whole thread is basically bashing LDS religion I guess I will to.
Nothing in the Quran has been proven wrong. People say it is much more accurate because it came out 700 years after the Bible. Well, (here comes the LDS bashing) but the book of Mormon came out in 1830... and lets just compare the two religions.
The Quran (the spellings are interchangeable btw). The Koran doesn't say that the earth was created in 7 days, it says 7 periods of time. It never states Noah's arc was global but rather in a sizable amount of land so a local phenomena.
Dalamon. Check out that response by The Black Swordsman. You said you haven't met anyone who claims the Quran is scientifically inerrant! Now you have. I personally have met hundreds, if not thousands who say the same thing. Like I said, you can make anything compatible with reality if you try hard enough (look at Coltons response about LDS compatibility with physics).
I normally don't like throwing religions under the bus but since this whole thread is basically bashing LDS religion I guess I will to.
Nothing in the Quran has been proven wrong. People say it is much more accurate because it came out 700 years after the Bible. Well, (here comes the LDS bashing) but the book of Mormon came out in 1830... and lets just compare the two religions.
The LDS church states that having black skin is a curse of god. The LDS church says that Native Americans are from Israel. DNA evidence clearly states that they are from ASIA of arctic Mongoloid origin. I mean, after reading that, it is pretty convincing that the LDS church does not comply with science.
The Koran never states the Sun rotates around the earth, it states that it has a rotation, which it does.
The Koran says that the Earth is egg shaped, more specifically an ostrich egg. Google what an ostrich egg looks like.
The Koran states that ALL living things are made out of water. An illiterate man in the desert said this 1400 years ago. The Quran says the word Hijab zero times.
The Quran (the spellings are interchangeable btw). The Koran doesn't say that the earth was created in 7 days, it says 7 periods of time. It never states Noah's arc was global but rather in a sizable amount of land so a local phenomena.
The Koran says that the stars will make the devils set ablaze, to compare the bible says they are tiny objects of the sky.
I love the Christian culture I truly do. I used to be Lutheran and I won't lie if I say I don't miss it, doing what I want to do and never having to pray and saying all my sins will be forgiven is nice. But Muslims are more Christian then Christians in that they follow the teaching of Christ. Just proclaiming you belief in him is a false belief. A vast majority of practicing Muslims don't drink, don't eat pork, and are circumcised. The same cannot be said about Christians. Eating pork and drinking is considered ok because later in the Bible it says "you cannot be corrupted by what you eat but rather by your actions" when previously it states all these things are bad. People take the bible as a buffet my family included. You can't just take what you wanna eat and leave the rest.
Steve Wells has commented on the translation used before.
https://skepticsannotatedbible.com/quran/about.html
https://sacred-texts.com/isl/pick/index.htm
All translations are flawed, of course.
Dude there was 20 pages of LDS bashing and now people are calling me out for it?
Show me your physics evidence Dr Colton
Oh wait the only thing they have found in their DNA was that they were cursed for being bad and were given red skin. Actually nvm.
Peter N. Jones (October 2002). American Indian Mtdna, Y Chromosome Genetic Data, and the Peopling of North America. Bauu Institute. p. 4.
"Scientific evidence links indigenous Americans to Asian peoples, specifically eastern Siberian populations. Indigenous peoples of the Americas have been linked to North Asian populations by linguistic factors, the distribution of blood types, and in genetic composition as reflected by molecular data, such as DNA."
Is it true or not true that soaking is not considered sex and is acceptable to do with people you are not married with. (Inserting a bare ***** in ****** and letting it soak in ******* fluid, as long as the Male doesn't ejaculate and their isn't an up/down motion)
For what it's worth, you are mischaracterizing LDS beliefs. If I were a betting man I'd be willing to bet that I'm much more of a scientist than you are (I'm a physicist and university professor with a PhD from U.C. Berkeley). And I find the LDS church to be very much compatible with science.
Is it true or not true that soaking is not considered sex and is acceptable to do with people you are not married with.
Also I hear the LDS church doesn't like black people as in they are cursed by God and God hasn't yet lifted that curse.