What's new
By:

Depth Chart Predictions

BabyPeterzz

BabyPeterzz

Well-Known Member
Contributor
PG: Harris/Watson/Burks/Tinsley
SG: CJ/Burks/Raja
SF: Hayward/Howard/CJ/Millsap/Evans
PF: Millsap/Favors/Kanter/Evans
C: Jefferson/Memo/Favors/Kanter
 
Last edited:
So who gets the most inactives this year out of this roster?
Two have to sit every game.
 
Harris/Watson/Tinsley (assuming he makes team)
Bell/Miles/Burks
Hayward/Howard/Miles/Evans
Millsap/Favors/Evans
Jefferson/Okur/Kanter

Interested to see how much Howard has left. If he returns to 75% of his Dallas years, he might end up starting alongside Hayward.
 
BabyPeterzz said:
PG: Harris/Watson/Burks/Tinsley
SG: CJ/Burks/Raja
SF: Hayward/Howard/CJ/Millsap/Evans
PF: Millsap/Favors/Kanter/Evans
C: Jefferson/Memo/Favors/Kanter
Click to expand...

I agree with this, but I think Howard is the odd man out at the beginning of the year. He'll get spot minutes until he's ready. I also think Bell starts over CJ. I'd rather start CJ and Hayward, but I think Ty is going to want CJ as a scorer on the 2nd unit, at least to start.
 
Depends on matchups from game to game. We do got a lot of depth, so I think we're gonna compete hard regardless of who's out there. If they're not, coach Ty will quickly point the offender to the bench...
 
Devin Harris/ Earl Watson
Gordon Hayward/ Alec Burks
Paul Millsap/ CJ Miles/ Jeremy Evans
Derrick Favors//Kanter
Al Jefferson/ Memo Okur
 
billyshelby said:
You predict Sap will start at the 3?
Click to expand...

Is that so far-fetched? I mean, has Miles set himself apart from the pack after all these years? Because if you're assuming that it's Hayward or Miles who's starting at the 3, you're also assuming Hayward or Burks (or Bell) is starting at the 2. Is is so unreasonable to think that our best, hardest working player, who's proved to us time and time again how he can develop his game has done so just a bit more once again, after playing some at the 3 last year, and has cracked the starting rotation ahead of players like Miles, Hayward, Burks and Bell?
 
SalmonHobo said:
Is that so far-fetched? I mean, has Miles set himself apart from the pack after all these years? Because if you're assuming that it's Hayward or Miles who's starting at the 3, you're also assuming Hayward or Burks (or Bell) is starting at the 2. Is is so unreasonable to think that our best, hardest working player, who's proved to us time and time again how he can develop his game has done so just a bit more once again, after playing some at the 3 last year, and has cracked the starting rotation ahead of players like Miles, Hayward, Burks and Bell?
Click to expand...

I'm pretty skeptical of Sap's ability to play the 3. If he could, it would be fantastic. But if he's going to make it there, I very much doubt it will come from Ty starting him at a position he's barely ever played. It would come from graduated steps. First, Sap gets spot minutes in matchups. Second, injuries/struggles push Ty into starting Sap.

Sap isn't a guy you convert to 3 right off the bat. Which is why I find it insane to predict he'll be the starting 3 on opening night. We'd be a ton better if he could actually play the position regularly. Personally, I don't think he can.
 
This is the lineup I hope we eventually end up with.

Harris/Watson/Burks
Burks/Miles/Bell
Hayward/Howard/Evans
Favors/Milsap
Jefferson/Okur/Kanter
 
I think this is realistically what it will look like:

1 Harris/Watson/Tinsely
2 Hayward/Burks/Bell
3 Miles/Millsap/Howard/Evans
4 Favors/Millsap/Kanter/Evans
5 Jefferson/Okur/Kanter
DNP = Tinsley, Evans

Miles plays more at the SF than the SG, and he doesn't need to play at the SG due to Burks and Hayward's improvement.
Burks can also get a few minutes at PG ahead of Watson.

If the Jazz have their veteran bias:

1 Harris, Watson, Tinsley
2 Hayward, Bell, Burks (Hayward was starting over Bell at the end of last season, but I could see the vet getting the nod every once in a while.)
3 Miles, Howard, Millsap, Evans
4 Millsap, Favors, Kanter, Evans (I just can't see Favors being pushed to the bench for long.)
5 Jefferson, Okur, Kanter
DNP = Tinsley, Evans

Miles and Jefferson are going to be in trade rumors, since Kanter can start at C, and Howard or Hayward can start at SF.
 
sojodave said:
This is the lineup I hope we eventually end up with.

Harris/Watson/Burks
Burks/Miles/Bell
Hayward/Howard/Evans
Favors/Milsap
Jefferson/Okur/Kanter
Click to expand...

Tweaked a tiny bit. Jefferson and Favors are sort of interchangeable depending on the 4's they're playing.

Harris/Watson/Burks
Burks/Miles/Bell
Hayward/Howard/Evans
Jefferson/Milsap
Favors/Kanter/Okur
 
Catchall said:
I think this is realistically what it will look like:

1 Harris/Watson/Tinsely
2 Hayward/Burks/Bell
3 Miles/Millsap/Howard/Evans
4 Favors/Millsap/Kanter/Evans
5 Jefferson/Okur/Kanter
DNP = Tinsley, Evans

Miles and Jefferson are going to be in trade rumors, IF Kanter can start at C, and Howard or Hayward can start at SF.
Click to expand...

I think Ty will shake up the lineup every few games due to the compressed schedule. Hopefully he also looks at matchups instead of just set rotations. I also think the schedule is going to lend itself to different guys getting DNP's. Harris always misses a few games every year; Okur may sit out once or twice a week, etc. And, I think Kanter will struggle as a sub; there's no way he's even remotely ready to be a starter. But, if he's a fast learner, then Jefferson or Millsap could be dealt at the deadline. I also think the Jazz will be dealing Tinsley, Howard and perhaps CJ if they're out of the playoff picture.
 
I think Kanter with half a clue might be better than Okur with a complete clue, at least in terms of defensive rotations and offensive rebounding. That said, if Okur is shooting well, it will open things up a bit for our post players. It will be interesting to see what Okur and Kanter both look like in pre-season.

There are a lot of possibilities with this team. If Millsap can play like a big SF, it adds another dimension. Josh Howard has a pretty complete game also if he's in good shape. He's smoother than Miles. Burks also sounds multi-dimensional. So is Hayward. It's going to be exciting to watch.
 
I'd be surprised if Jazz trade anyone this season.
They now have talent, depth, youth, experience at every position.
They have a manageable payroll, contracts, and considerable cap room next year.
Jazz have gone from turmoil last year to a very promising future.
No need to shake things up till next season.
Anything is possible but Jazz front office has done exceptional job.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top