That wasn't the ****ing question. But, I know your super power is avoiding the question.He averaged more ppg with a higher FG% then Curry when his team was the best offensive team in the NBA. Same argument can be made for Rudy Gobert, why pay him $40M when the Warriors were better defensively with vet min venter Kevon Looney holding it down, lol.
Quit playing obtuse and answer the question.Last season:
Donovan Mitchell: 26 ppg, 4 rpg, 5 apg on 45/35/85 splits
Stephen Curry: 25.5 ppg, 5 rpg, 6 apg on 44/38/92 splits
Devin Booker: 27 ppg, 5 rpg, 5 apg on 46/38/85 splits
Don sucks though, how exactly did we have the best offense in the NBA last season?
Donovan Mitchell: 26 ppg, 4 rpg, 5 apg on 45/35/85 splitsThat wasn't the ****ing question. But, I know your super power is avoiding the question.
Curry averages 1 more rebound/1 more assist per game while scoring less/lower efficiency. Booker scores 1 more ppg on slightly better efficiency and averages the same number of rebounds and assists. Neither guy is great defensively either. So do they suck?Quit playing obtuse and answer the question.
So, I take it you can't identify ONE thing DM can do above average other than volume scoring. Got it.Donovan Mitchell: 26 ppg, 4 rpg, 5 apg on 45/35/85 splits
Stephen Curry: 25.5 ppg, 5 rpg, 6 apg on 44/38/92 splits
Devin Booker: 27 ppg, 5 rpg, 5 apg on 46/38/85 splits
Averaged basically the same number across the board as Curry and Booker last season. Does that argument apply for them as well? What did they do significantly better then Donovan on worse offensive teams?
Rebounding and playmaking at nearly the same rate as Finals MVP, Steph Curry.So, I take it you can't identify ONE thing DM can do above average other than volume scoring. Got it.
Trade the vets (Gay, Conley, Beverly)if doing so nets the Jazz picks.
Booker: Leads his team to the Finals, then into the 2nd roundLast season:
Donovan Mitchell: 26 ppg, 4 rpg, 5 apg on 45/35/85 splits
Stephen Curry: 25.5 ppg, 5 rpg, 6 apg on 44/38/92 splits
Devin Booker: 27 ppg, 5 rpg, 5 apg on 46/38/85 splits
Don sucks though, how exactly did we have the best offense in the NBA last season?
And yet cannot generate a series win like Steph. Weird huh?Rebounding and playmaking at nearly the same rate as Finals MVP, Steph Curry.
Curry actually has an elite HOF god tier defender in Green and good scoring options around him not a PE teacher and Jordan Clarkson.And yet cannot generate a series win like Steph. Weird huh?
What about in the clutch this year when games actually mattered? What about in the playoffs this year? How do they compare?Donovan Mitchell: 26 ppg, 4 rpg, 5 apg on 45/35/85 splits
Stephen Curry: 25.5 ppg, 5 rpg, 6 apg on 44/38/92 splits
Devin Booker: 27 ppg, 5 rpg, 5 apg on 46/38/85 splits
Averaged basically the same number across the board as Curry and Booker last season. Does that argument apply for them as well? What did they do significantly better then Donovan on worse offensive teams?
There 7 players that have averaged 25+ ppg and 5+ apg the last two seasons, Donovan is one of them.What about in the clutch this year when games actually mattered? What about in the playoffs this year? How do they compare?
All it’s going to take is one bad season or lots of injuries to them and our haul of 1st rounders will be a masterstroke of a trade
That was a swing and miss by you on anything close to an anwer. That wasnt the question and your argument might be for someone else.There 7 players that have averaged 25+ ppg and 5+ apg the last two seasons, Donovan is one of them.
Again we just saw a team trade away 2 lottery picks to clear cap space for Jalen Brunson on a 100M+ deal and people act like Don isn't going to be valued around the league.
We should tank, hopefully the guy we get averages 25/5/5
Can you show me the clutch stats for him against the other top stars in the league? Also 25/5/5 on 45/35/85 splits for the #1 offensive team in the NBA is really bad? LolI want to keep Mitchell if he is committed to staying at least a couple more seasons. If he isnt then you trade him for the best thing possible, he has decent value but we wont come out ahead in the trade.
But again Mitchell was really bad last year. Can he bounce back? Probably, but maybe not. He did not defend at all, he was historically bad in the clutch (maybe the worst ever in NBA history for that amount touches) and was terrible in the playoffs on both ends.
You think Bojan, Rudy, and Clarkson are better scoring options then Thompson, Poole, and Wiggins? JesusI want to keep Mitchell if he is committed to staying at least a couple more seasons. If he isnt then you trade him for the best thing possible, he has decent value but we wont come out ahead in the trade.
But again Mitchell was really bad last year. Can he bounce back? Probably, but maybe not. He did not defend at all, he was historically bad in the clutch (maybe the worst ever in NBA history for that amount touches) and was terrible in the playoffs on both ends.
Steph won because he is a much better player and had good defense around him. We had good or better scoring options around Mitchell, we had an elite defender. We had no other defenders though and we had our star player choke really hard in the playoffs.
We did have the number one offense. Those three score more points at 48 vs 56 but at worse true shooting percentage and better offensive ranking, hence the #1 offensive rating team in the NBA. You also left off Conley who is the worst offensive rating of those 4 on the Jazz is better than the best from those 3.You think Bojan, Rudy, and Clarkson are better scoring options then Thompson, Poole, and Wiggins? Jesus