What's new

Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz

Sure... or... hang with me here... he could figure some **** out and improve and be a part of the success of the next group. Win/win.

If we landed a draft guy that made Sexton expendable then you move him then. I think his value goes up from where it is currently.
He has already improved and he is still a net negative and just a conducive player to high level winning. He can keep improving at his strengths and not much is going to change. He's Monta Ellis. If the Jazz want to be a successful team, they should look to move him.
 
He has already improved and he is still a net negative and just a conducive player to high level winning. He can keep improving at his strengths and not much is going to change. He's Monta Ellis. If the Jazz want to be a successful team, they should look to move him.
He's not a net negative.
 
He has already improved and he is still a net negative and just a conducive player to high level winning. He can keep improving at his strengths and not much is going to change. He's Monta Ellis. If the Jazz want to be a successful team, they should look to move him.
Also, Monta's production plus Sexton's attitude would be a helluva player.

Sexton can improve on his weaknesses... and his strengths. If we hit a ceiling with him then we can move him then... we haven't gotten there.
 
The best part is when Cy throws his arms in the air when posters give him **** about Collin playing well "I don't hate him" "I gave him his praise" yada yada.
 
Who do you think has more value: Sexton or Clarkson?
You truely are clueless sometimes. Midseason buyers dont care about future value. They care about immediate impact, fit to the team and box score history. Sexton also looks more like a project on tape while JC looks more like a finished product.

Sexton is more valueable only if we use him as a chip to trade with a rebuilding team, but that would make us the buyer.
 
When the Jazz trade him I will be vindicated and everyone will realize they agreed with me the whole time.
You want to tank, yet you want to trade the player you claim is helping the tank more.
You want to rebuild, yet you want to trade away a 23 year old future prospect and extend a 30 year old win now piece sharing a similar skillset.

Somewhere inside your head this all makes sense.

Fascinating.
 
You truely are clueless sometimes. Midseason buyers dont care about future value. They care about immediate impact, fit to the team and box score history. Sexton also looks more like a project on tape while JC looks more like a finished product.

Sexton is more valueable only if we use him as a chip to trade with a rebuilding team, but that would make us the buyer.
Lmfao
 
You truely are clueless sometimes. Midseason buyers dont care about future value. They care about immediate impact, fit to the team and box score history. Sexton also looks more like a project on tape while JC looks more like a finished product.

Sexton is more valueable only if we use him as a chip to trade with a rebuilding team, but that would make us the buyer.
To add on just to laughing at you.

Clarkson is likely in the last year if his deal as he has a player option. Sexton has 3 years left after this year. The question of who is more valuable is valid.
 
You want to tank, yet you want to trade the player you claim is helping the tank more.
You want to rebuild, yet you want to trade away a 23 year old future prospect and extend a 30 year old win now piece sharing a similar skillset.

Somewhere inside your head this all makes sense.

Fascinating.
Sexton absolutely helps the tank, but so will NAW, so will THT, so will Ochai. The Jazz have no shortage of mediocre backups guards who aren't ready to be starters.
 
And Sexton/Clarkson in no way have similar skill sets. They have similar overarching roles (scorers) but they go about it very differently.

And Clarkson is flat out better and he's (supposedly) loved by the owner so it's something we have to live with I guess.
 
And Sexton/Clarkson in no way have similar skill sets. They have similar overarching roles (scorers) but they go about it very differently.

And Clarkson is flat out better and he's (supposedly) loved by the owner so it's something we have to live with I guess.
Tony Finau gonna be our ****ing GM some day.
 
Would be interested to see how a Mike Conley would impact John Collins effectiveness.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G--fGaIimXo

I can't tell if the trade rumors have gotten to him and he needs a change of scenery or if its injuries sapping his athleticism.

In theory I like John... he is one of those guys that gets like 1.5 blks and 1+ steals while doing some scoring, shooting and rebounding. I also think we should be looking at Atlanta guys... Trae has created a weird environment over there where some guys might be undervalued and do well with a change of scenery. I think Trae is amazing for a rolling big like Capela (or Rudy... they should look at that if Minny changes course), but maybe he's not great to play next to if you are a wing or a guy who might thrive in an environment with more ball movement. I think these heliocentric offenses with Young, Luka, and Harden back in the day may depend too much on these guys and have a ceiling... not sure every guy thrives in that environment. Is Collins kinda Kuzma-y in that you get away from a guy that puts you in a box and he thrives. Huerter seems to be doing well in Sacramento.

If the price on Collins is Beasley, Vando, Gay I am looking really hard at it. If its higher I'm waiting it out. Things are ugly in Atlanta and they have a cap crunch coming and have shown an unwillingness to jump into the tax. They will sell something off at a discount.
 
Back
Top