YoungJefe
Well-Known Member
I'd take the two prospects for him, lol.I love that you think Vando is worth 2 prospects and a first.
I'd take the two prospects for him, lol.I love that you think Vando is worth 2 prospects and a first.
Unfortunately big athletic wings are at such a premium, it'll cost an arm and a leg to acquire anyone notable.I don't want more 6'4" 6'5" guys. We have plenty of experience with these guys. I want more length and athleticism like what we saw the the Raptors. I want to bundle Vando with someone else who can lift this team now and in the future. No band aid short sighted deals like we did with KO,
I realize KO was when we didn't know a lot about this team and we had to get some front court options. But we know what we got now.
I just don't see Vando having much of a ceiling above what we see today.
What? Are you suggesting you wouldnt enjoy the Russ/THT/Robinson/Hart/Dok lineup and those 23 first round picks in the piggy bank?Doesn't surprise me a bit that you would. Thank goodness you are not the GM.
Dame has said in the past that Vando is one of the guys he'd like to play with.Strong rumors now that POR is interested in Vando.
Who or what from their team would we want for him?
Strong rumors now that POR is interested in Vando.
Who or what from their team would we want for him?
I think I'd prefer OG Anunoby to Pascal Siakam tbh.I don't know what it would take to get Pascal Siakam but I think he would be a tremendous pickup with this group.
Siakam + Markaanen + Kessler
Clarkson + Conley
Thats a fun starting lineup! Clarkson and Conley feel like the weakest links in that group.
This. Siakam is worse as a perimeter defender and as a 3 pt shooter. Worse fit with Kessler and also overlaps with Lauri. I dont think we would get our money's worth with him. OG is pretty much guaranteed value skillsetwise.. too bad his contract doesnt work for us right now.I think I'd prefer OG Anunoby to Pascal Siakam tbh.
OG is younger and I think he's someone like Lauri who could blow up in a larger role, the only issue with him is it's a flight risk after next year.This. Siakam is worse as a perimeter defender and as a 3 pt shooter. Worse fit with Kessler and also overlaps with Lauri. I dont think we would get our money's worth with him. OG is pretty much guaranteed value skillsetwise.. too bad his contract doesnt work for us right now.
Yeah the contract is a turn off for us unfortunately. I dont expect him to like blow up offensively... he doesnt look great with the ball in his hands. But offensively we are very good as is, so replacing KO/Vando with someone who can be at least as good a contributor while providing excellent perimeter defense would be a gimmie.OG is younger and I think he's someone like Lauri who could blow up in a larger role, the only issue with him is it's a flight risk after next year.
OG makes $17.3M but we could make it work with Vanderbilt ($4.3M) and some combination of Olynyk ($12.8M), THT ($10.2M), Gay ($6.1M), NAW ($5M).
I'd just be kind of hesitant to give up a ton of draft capital.
I agree with all of that.Yeah the contract is a turn off for us unfortunately. I dont expect him to like blow up offensively... he doesnt look great with the ball in his hands. But offensively we are very good as is, so replacing KO/Vando with someone who can be at least as good a contributor while providing excellent perimeter defense would be a gimmie.
We still need to stabilize the guard positions, whether it comes with extending JC or not we at least need to find the successor to Conley... so I would first see which area of need we can better address through this years draft and then work to address the more lacking area in the offseason. If we would be able to draft high upside combo guards and there would be no true playmaking PG types available, then that affects the thinking for that 3rd frontcourt guy as well.
My ideal trio to start alongside Lauri and Kessler is something like this:I agree with all of that.
And yeah, we need to find a PG and a big wing with some juice on the ball that can score / defend. I know Danny sees it too which is why he was interested in Pat Williams, Hunter, etc this offseason. I would've loved Scoot Henderson but we'll need a lottery miracle for that to happen. Amen Thompson would be a great fit as well but would probably require us trading up. I like Agbaji as a 3&D two guard going forward, hopefully we can work him into the rotation more.
I think ideally Agbaji develops into that off ball player who can also defend other teams best perimeter player. I think Kessler will eventually develop into at least an average 3P shooter which would be huge for our spacing. I think ideally we either add 1) An elite PG / versatile 3&D wing 2) An elite wing / versatile 3&D PG. Jaylen Brown, Amen Thompson, and Scoot Henderson are on my wish list.My ideal trio to start alongside Lauri and Kessler is something like this:
All 3 guys must be (at least) good perimeter defenders and 3P shooters.
1 of the 3 needs to be an elite on-ball self-creator
1 needs to be an elite 1on1 defender with super high motor
1 needs to be an off-ball player on offense (can be the same guy as the previous one)
I think Kessler doesnt need the same caliber of playmaker Gobert needed to score more than just putbacks.. because his offensive skillset is better to begin with. But we need 4 guys who can space and defend the perimeter with him in there. Kessler is never gonna be left on an island inside with Lauri being able to help against teams who drive a lot.. but as with Gobert, the small ball lineups will kill us if we dont shore up our perimeter defense.
Siakam needs the ball in his hands all the time. He's good, but he's also an overdribbler who can't seem to be able to do anything without putting the ball on the floor first.This. Siakam is worse as a perimeter defender and as a 3 pt shooter. Worse fit with Kessler and also overlaps with Lauri. I dont think we would get our money's worth with him. OG is pretty much guaranteed value skillsetwise.. too bad his contract doesnt work for us right now.
Makes too much senseVanderbilt for Bones Hyland?
I will do it. They both seems to lack of basketball IQ but Bones can become a good shooting guy which i do think Vando will never be.Vanderbilt for Bones Hyland?
Bones could be our PG of the future too although him and Sexton may be kind of redundant.I will do it. They both seems to lack of basketball IQ but Bones can become a good shooting guy which i do think Vando will never be.
Agree. I'm still in between with Colin. I love the energy and the ability to create his own offense but he got a tunnel vision at that stage. Hope he can improve.Bones could be our PG of the future too although him and Sexton may be kind of redundant.