SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
I'm sure you can offer a quote that said Hutchinson never heard such a rumor from her fellow agents. Any time you're ready.
.You calling it a rumor proves that it's just that.
Derp
I'm sure you can offer a quote that said Hutchinson never heard such a rumor from her fellow agents. Any time you're ready.
.You calling it a rumor proves that it's just that.
Derp
Then we agree it's not a lie.You calling it a rumor proves that it's just that.
I believe the actual people in the vehicle not a person who heard it through an anonymous source. I have common sense though. She lied... She admitted it. If it was true it would have been pursued not swept under the rug.Then we agree it's not a lie.
She lied about not hearing the rumor, and then corrected her testimony later that same day. It's nice when we agree.I believe the actual people in the vehicle not a person who heard it through an anonymous source. I have common sense though. She lied... She admitted it. If it was true it would have been pursued not swept under the rug.
So, we agree she wasn't lying.There is absolutely no evidence that this happened outside of her lying that it didn't then saying it did even though she didn't even see it.
Nothing in that tweet said she didn't hear that rumor. I'm glad we agree she told the truth about hearing the rumor.Hell you cultist that believe anything... Even the guy who she said told her it was willing to testify she lied.
I suppose it is silly in how obvious the observation is. Which one of these two contrasting statements is true?This reply of your’s is one of your silliest ever
...had a surprise witness lie about Trump grabbing a steering wheel
No, they did not have a witness that lied about that…..
Well to you no where near enough has been seen, to a democrat a whole lot of it has been seen, so it likely falls somewhere in the middle.While I agree with your main point, we have not "already seen so much of it". Less than a third of it has been seen by anyone outside law enforcement, and included in those not able to see the footage are defense attorneys in court cases. I don't see how that isn't a Brady violation, but this trove of video that legally should be in the public domain has been kept covered up using some shady acts by the capitol police and justice department. The entire trove needs to be put on a server for download to everyone who wants it.
A "whole lot" is a relative term that could be defined any way anyone wants to. What I said was that less than a third of it has been seen by those not in law enforcement, and that is an accurate statement without wiggle words.Well to you no where near enough has been seen, to a democrat a whole lot of it has been seen, so it likely falls somewhere in the middle.
Either she who wasn't even there lied or the people actually there lied. I believe the people actually there. Especially seeing how the person she said told her this is willing to testify that it never happened. Common senseShe lied about not hearing the rumor, and then corrected her testimony later that same day. It's nice when we agree.
So, we agree she wasn't lying.
A third of how much? So if it is what, 40k hours or something, 12k hours have been released? Seems fairly substantial to me. Awful hard to cherry pick 12k hours in its entirety.A "whole lot" is a relative term that could be defined any way anyone wants to. What I said was that less than a third of it has been seen by those not in law enforcement, and that is an accurate statement without wiggle words.
I agree. Neither happened. She told the truth, and so did the people in the car.Either she who wasn't even there lied or the people actually there lied.
So do I.I believe the people actually there.
So you admit she lied, because she wasn't even there but the people who were there say it never happened. If someone says something happened but it never really happened that person is lying.I agree. Neither happened. She told the truth, and so did the people in the car.
So do I.
...And that is where we disagree. I think it inadequate, and I think releasing all 41,000 hours to one media outlet is also inadequate. I want to see everything released to everyone. I do not trust the authorities to curate bits and pieces, nor do I trust Tucker as a sole source of analysis. If we've already seen all there is to see then why not release it?Seems fairly substantial to me.
This is what the committee should have been doing... Instead they didn't allow proper Republican council and created a one-sided Kangaroo court. This should not be left to Tucker or any other news source if the committee was honest....And that is where we disagree. I think it inadequate, and I think releasing all 41,000 hours to one media outlet is also inadequate. I want to see everything released to everyone. I do not trust the authorities to curate bits and pieces, nor do I trust Tucker as a sole source of analysis. If we've already seen all there is to see then why not release it?
That would be the goal. No one is going to beat Biden in the primary. His in-party numbers are hovering around 90%. In poll after poll after poll, Biden loses a head-to-head against DeSantis, and DeSantis is looking increasingly like he's powering to the nomination.I was watching one of her longer interviews last night. Can only help Trump I imagine.
![]()
By speaking out, could foreperson in Georgia Trump probe undermine a future case?
The foreperson of the Georgia grand jury probing election interference by former President Trump has publicly telegraphed some of her panel's closely held findings.abcnews.go.com
Uh..... I will definitely be cheering louder than the GOP if that were to happen.That would be the goal. No one is going to beat Biden in the primary. His in-party numbers are hovering around 90%. In poll after poll after poll, Biden loses a head-to-head against DeSantis, and DeSantis is looking increasingly like he's powering to the nomination.
![]()
Michigan Poll: DeSantis over Trump by Five | National Review
A theme in early polling of the 2024 Republican primaries is that DeSantis beats Trump if the race comes down to a head-to-head, two-man binary choice.www.nationalreview.com
The best hope for democrats to hold on to the White House in 2024 is for Trump to beat DeSantis in the primary. This is going to be the silliest of silly seasons where life-long democrats start doing things to help strengthen Trump. If the democrats in Georgia or elsewhere manage to make Trump ineligible due to involvement in an insurrection, no one will be cheering louder than the GOP.
Glad to have you on Team DeSantis!Uh..... I will definitely be cheering louder than the GOP if that were to happen.