That might explain why they haven’t used much of their cap space yet. Spurs could put together a much better offer than the Heat and would be must watch basketball, but I have a bit of a hard time seeing them as immediate contenders.
I don’t know. I can think of a few players who have backed out of verbal agreements (Deandre Jordan, Marcus Morris). If they’re not binding for the players I don’t see how they would be for the team.I think the verbal agreement is binding. I think they’d be in trouble unless he got arrested or failed a physical…
I do imagine him putting pen to paper then immediately turning to the GM and saying… I’d like to formally request a trade to a contender… thank you.
And D-Lo’s deal is only two years.The Reaves contract will only count like 15M on their cap sheet too.. even though it could go to 4/98.
If Grant lost money cuz the spots closed up… I think he’d have a case.I don’t know. I can think of a few players who have backed out of verbal agreements (Deandre Jordan, Marcus Morris). If they’re not binding for the players I don’t see how they would be for the team.
Yeah, to be clear I don’t think there is any chance they’ll actually back out. Just a mental exercise of wondering if they could. I’m guessing they made that contract offer already knowing Dame was likely asking for a trade.If Grant lost money cuz the spots closed up… I think he’d have a case.
He dedSo if Utah wanted Vasilije Micic why wouldn't we be interested in Exum?
I think the players would have less recourse if they change their mind than a team would by pulling an accepted offer.Anyone forgetting the DeAndre Jordan hostage situation?
Twitter is ****ed so I can't even follow rumors. Burn in hell Musk
Doctrine of promisary estoppel ie detrimental reliance.How? Nothing has been signed.
Twitter is ****ed so I can't even follow rumors. Burn in hell Musk
What’s wrong with the tweeter?I can’t even do anything it’s so annoying.