What's new
By:

Does Lauri Get Traded?

Does Lauri Get Dealt Before The Season Starts?

  • Total voters
    134
  • Poll closed .
SoberasHotRod said:
Yes, I would fully expect him to be on board with getting slimy. To some degree he already had gotten on board the last two years and still wants to extend, so we might really get the both of best worlds (Lauri + top 5 pick).
Click to expand...

I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that winning might not be at the very top of his priority list for the here and now. He seems to like Utah, and has kids that are theoretically entering school age. I’d pretty easily settle for $40M+ a year and some stability if I were him at this point in life, with the very real possibility of winning in the next 3-5 years
 
David Stern said:
I’d pretty easily settle for $40M+ a year and some stability if I were him at this point in life, with the very real possibility of winning in the next 3-5 years
Click to expand...
And how exactly did you calculate this "very real possibility of winning in the next 3-5 years"? At the moment the Jazz have absolutely nobody on the team (besides Lauri) who could be one of three players on not even a contender but simply a perennial playoff team. And none of the young players shows clear promise that they can become this player in 3-5 year.

Or did you mean that in 3-5 years the Jazz can conceivably make playoffs and simply making playoffs would count for winning? Again, based on what?
 
KqWIN said:
Speaking of teams that are desperate, are the Lakers just not going to do anything to improve?
Click to expand...
Lmao and what cap or assets do they have to use to make the team better exactly. Yes they have been rumored or linked to every allstar guard there is but let’s be real, nothing on those fronts were ever going to happen.
 
jazznik said:
And how exactly did you calculate this "very real possibility of winning in the next 3-5 years"? At the moment the Jazz have absolutely nobody on the team (besides Lauri) who could be one of three players on not even a contender but simply a perennial playoff team. And none of the young players shows clear promise that they can become this player in 3-5 year.

Or did you mean that in 3-5 years the Jazz can conceivably make playoffs and simply making playoffs would count for winning? Again, based on what?
Click to expand...
Lol you forgot sexton played at an all star level at 25 years old silly.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
jazznik said:
And how exactly did you calculate this "very real possibility of winning in the next 3-5 years"? At the moment the Jazz have absolutely nobody on the team (besides Lauri) who could be one of three players on not even a contender but simply a perennial playoff team. And none of the young players shows clear promise that they can become this player in 3-5 year.

Or did you mean that in 3-5 years the Jazz can conceivably make playoffs and simply making playoffs would count for winning? Again, based on what?
Click to expand...
Man, 3-5 years in the NBA is an eternity. The Jazz entering the '13-14 season were in a way worse position asset-wise, drafted a bust in the 2014 draft, and were still a 2nd round team by '16-17.
 
MT Steve said:
Man, 3-5 years in the NBA is an eternity. The Jazz entering the '13-14 season were in a way worse position asset-wise, drafted a bust in the 2014 draft, and were still a 2nd round team by '16-17.
Click to expand...
It is but there are plenty of teams that were as bad as the Jaz, had high picks and were still bad 3-5 years later: the Timberwolves, Detroit, Hornets... And the picks take some time to develop: to become good in 3-5 years it means drafting a future star or two like next year - and they should develop unusually fast. Look at the 2021 draft: Sengun, Barnes, Cade, maybe even Green look like good picks and future All-Stars. But are the teams that drafted them 3 years ago - Toronto, Houston, Detroit - are competing for anything or even simply playoff locks?

For some reason, people are so sure that in 3-5 years the Jazz will be a strong playoff team based on nothing but blind hope and "three years is a long time!". We do not have a collection of high picks, we do not have a team committed to the all-out tank, and we don't have any super-promising young prospects. All we have is Lauri, a one-time All-Star, and most teams in the league have a player of Lauri's caliber or a young player who is likely to reach his level.

Let's be realistic, folks: so far we have nothing that promises future greatness. And Lauri knows that.
 
MT Steve said:
Man, 3-5 years in the NBA is an eternity. The Jazz entering the '13-14 season were in a way worse position asset-wise, drafted a bust in the 2014 draft, and were still a 2nd round team by '16-17.
Click to expand...
I think the league as a whole is also way better now than then (or at least not as top-heavy).
 
jazznik said:
It is but there are plenty of teams that were as bad as the Jaz, had high picks and were still bad 3-5 years later: the Timberwolves, Detroit, Hornets...
Click to expand...
The argument isn't "Every team in a bad situation becomes a winning franchise in 3-5 years". It's "Plenty of teams in far worse situations, including the Jazz themselves, have become a winning team within 3-5 years".

There's nothing delusional about thinking a team in a dramatically better spot asset-wise has a very real possibility of becoming a winning team in 3-5 years.
 
jazznik said:
And how exactly did you calculate this "very real possibility of winning in the next 3-5 years"? At the moment the Jazz have absolutely nobody on the team (besides Lauri) who could be one of three players on not even a contender but simply a perennial playoff team. And none of the young players shows clear promise that they can become this player in 3-5 year.

Or did you mean that in 3-5 years the Jazz can conceivably make playoffs and simply making playoffs would count for winning? Again, based on what?
Click to expand...

**** ton of Draft Picks + **** Ton of Cap Space + Danny Ainge = Very real chance

To answer your later post in the thread, none of the garbage teams you mentioned had this combination. Danny has made it work before, why wouldn’t I have hope that he could do it again?
 
David Stern said:
**** ton of Draft Picks + **** Ton of Cap Space + Danny Ainge = Very real chance

To answer your later post in the thread, none of the garbage teams you mentioned had this combination. Danny has made it work before, why wouldn’t I have hope that he could do it again?
Click to expand...
So, the foundation of this believe is the blind faith in Ainge. He is human. His past success was achieved by being a GM in one of the most desirable NBA markets, for a storied team. He has no experience working for a small market team in one of the worst NBA locations.

In his tenure at the Jazz he made some good moves, like trading Mitchell and Gobert for a lot of assets (although the enthusiasm from two years ago about those future MIN and CLE picks being gold decidedly subsided), but he also made quite a few questionable moves: not commiting fully either to the tank or fighting for the playoffs, drafting Collins, trading NAW, his drafting looked quite average...

Nothing is guaranteed in the NBA.
 
SoberasHotRod said:
Yes, I would fully expect him to be on board with getting slimy. To some degree he already had gotten on board the last two years and still wants to extend, so we might really get the both of best worlds (Lauri + top 5 pick).
Click to expand...

Not to dig up the old conversation, but this is definitely something I’ve factored into my tanking calculations. If Lauri signs up to play for this franchise, he knows what the deal is. I can understand his shock/frustration with what happened this year….but even then he played ball and there will be no surprises. The direction/point of the season will not be ambiguous even if he’s on the roster, and that’s true from day 1….not trade deadline.
 
KqWIN said:
Speaking of teams that are desperate, are the Lakers just not going to do anything to improve?
Click to expand...
They are gonna sell alot of tickets and make history - first father and son teamates in the league. Then bron is gonna recruit his son for team usa- first father and son in olympics. Then they gonna draft his other kid after 2 years. Jeannie buss is gonna be super rich
 
jazznik said:
So, the foundation of this believe is the blind faith in Ainge. He is human. His past success was achieved by being a GM in one of the most desirable NBA markets, for a storied team. He has no experience working for a small market team in one of the worst NBA locations.

In his tenure at the Jazz he made some good moves, like trading Mitchell and Gobert for a lot of assets (although the enthusiasm from two years ago about those future MIN and CLE picks being gold decidedly subsided), but he also made quite a few questionable moves: not commiting fully either to the tank or fighting for the playoffs, drafting Collins, trading NAW, his drafting looked quite average...

Nothing is guaranteed in the NBA.
Click to expand...
Has Boston signed a max UFA (from another team) outside of Gordon Hayward in the last 30 years?
 
My guess is the Spurs increase their offer a day or two before the day Lauri can re-sign. Then Lauri will demand all the money to sign on the day that allows him to still be traded at the end of the deadline and if they don't sign on that day they will be willing to take slightly less money
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
My guess is the Spurs increase their offer a day or two before the day Lauri can re-sign. Then Lauri will demand all the money to sign on the day that allows him to still be traded at the end of the deadline and if they don't sign on that day they will be willing to take slightly less money
Click to expand...
Lauri will get every cent for the renegotiation. You can book that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top