Donald is about to go through some things...
- Thread starter The Thriller
- Start date
PJF
Well-Known Member
TheStormofWar
Well-Known Member
Yeah, Judge Cannon just fell on her sword for Trump citing the dumbest reason. No chance she isn't on the take.
Edit: for anyone curious, she decided that the Special Counsel's appointment violated the Appointment Clause in the Constitution, despite having over 150 years and about 10 SCOTUS cases to back it up. If she wanted to dismiss the charges, there were 100 different ways she could have done it, but as we've seen with her, she is just a... special little snowflake.
Last edited:
fishonjazz
Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
So that means if I'm ever subpoenaed for anything I don't have to do anything. Nice to know. The precedent has been set.
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
TheStormofWar
Well-Known Member
For about 150 years, dating back to 1875.
fishonjazz
Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
Also if a warrant is ever executed on my home I know I can hide anything they are looking for and obstruct the search with no repercussions. Pretty sweet
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
Lolololol the tyrants are angry!!!! It's all falling apart. They even tried to assassinate him.
SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
Especially if the FBI plants evidence like they literally did. I've explained this but you can't comprehend how the FBI literally tampered and brought in evidence.
fishonjazz
Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
The FBI literally plants evidence, when you're not fake ignoring me I discussed with you and you ignored it, I pushed for you to acknowledge it and you didn't for obvious reasons.
Next second your accusing Trump of wanting to arrest political opponents while you openly advocate for illegal arresting of political opponents.
I'm sorry fish, your inability to be honest is why I hound you. You're either for arresting political opponents, which you are and openly advocate unless it's Biden, or you're not. Me personally I am 100% against it.
Last edited:
TheStormofWar
Well-Known Member
Huh? Your assassin was a registered Republican and Cannon dismissed the case for something that has been precedent since 1875. What the **** are you even talking about?
fishonjazz
Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
It's interesting that in trump criminal cases its never about evidence proving him guilty or not guilty.
It's about how it's being held in a blue state! It's a corrupt judge! It's a prosecutor who didn't get the case in the proper way!
Never about the actual evidence or the crime. Trump and his attorneys know he is guilty on these cases so they complain about things unrelated to the actual cases and evidence.
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
It's about how it's being held in a blue state! It's a corrupt judge! It's a prosecutor who didn't get the case in the proper way!
Never about the actual evidence or the crime. Trump and his attorneys know he is guilty on these cases so they complain about things unrelated to the actual cases and evidence.
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
fishonjazz
Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
Be angry bruh... Do you even know why the case was postponed in the first place? Because Jack Smith admitted the the FBI tampered with the evidence. They also admit that some of the folders in the picture were not even at Mar a Lago and they staged it.
TheStormofWar
Well-Known Member
You don't even know why the case was dismissed, do you?
SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
Let's also address how it's congresses job to anoint a prosecutor, not Biden.
SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
True or false?
The Appointments Clause says, "Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States be appointed by the President subject to the advice and consent of the Senate, although Congress may vest the appointment of inferior officers in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments." Smith, however, was never confirmed by the Senate.
SteakNEggs
Well-Known Member
True or false? We can't have Presidents illegally hiring special prosecutors to arrest other political candidates. It takes Congress.
True or false fish?
The Appointments Clause says, "Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States be appointed by the President subject to the advice and consent of the Senate, although Congress may vest the appointment of inferior officers in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments." Smith, however, was never confirmed by the Senate.
TheStormofWar
Well-Known Member
So it's your contention the Trump administration's appointments Mueller and Durham, as well as every Independent Counsel since 1875, requires the appointment by Congress, despite the fact it is not Congress's purview to enforce the laws of our nation and every related SCOTUS case said they were good on this concept. Do I have your bat*** logic correct?