What's new

Kamala Harris for Pres

Another thing to think about is what is the worst-case scenario for each candidate.

For Kamala the worst case is a lame-duck presidency where she kind of doesn't do much of anything. I am expecting something like this. Mostly lame-duck with a few surprises that we didn't expect, like maybe she shows she is a better diplomat than we expected, or maybe she gets some minor bi-partisan thing passed. But generally not much happening is likely her worst case. She isn't a dreaded and terrifying *gasp* "socialist", so we don't have much to worry about there, and she just doesn't have the clout to push much through of consequence. So she might surprise with some kind of executive order or other unexpected thing, but for the most part she is likely to be just boring and not do much.

For Trump the worst case is the continued erosion of our liberties and the continued deconstruction of all of our social platforms. I could see him do what he had to in order to increase the tax cuts for the rich and make them permanent. Then we can add even more to the national debt because huge businesses and billionaires continue to pay a far lower percent in taxes than regular folks, so the middle class gets to eat it again. I could also see him working to extend his term beyond 4 years and, frankly, the worst case scenario there is he refuses to leave office and uses his hand-picked supreme court to support him in that as any suit brought against him, or charge, is buried under the "it's an official act of the president" pile of ****. Civil war is another possible worst case, but I see that more likely if he loses the vote.

For RFK worst case is he starts to propagate the brain worm that is controlling him, giving one to everyone in America, so the aliens can take over much more quickly.


How do you all envision the worst case for each one?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MVP
Another thing to think about is what is the worst-case scenario for each candidate.

For Kamala the worst case is a lame-duck presidency where she kind of doesn't do much of anything. I am expecting something like this. Mostly lame-duck with a few surprises that we didn't expect, like maybe she shows she is a better diplomat than we expected, or maybe she gets some minor bi-partisan thing passed. But generally not much happening is likely her worst case. She isn't a dreaded and terrifying *gasp* "socialist", so we don't have much to worry about there, and she just doesn't have the clout to push much through of consequence. So she might surprise with some kind of executive order or other unexpected thing, but for the most part she is likely to be just boring and not do much.

For Trump the worst case is the continued erosion of our liberties and the continued deconstruction of all of our social platforms. I could see him do what he had to in order to increase the tax cuts for the rich and make them permanent. Then we can add even more to the national debt because huge businesses and billionaires continue to pay a far lower percent in taxes than regular folks, so the middle class gets to eat it again. I could also see him working to extend his term beyond 4 years and, frankly, the worst case scenario there is he refuses to leave office and uses his hand-picked supreme court to support him in that as any suit brought against him, or charge, is buried under the "it's an official act of the president" pile of ****. Civil war is another possible worst case, but I see that more likely if he loses the vote.

For RFK worst case is he starts to propagate the brain worm that is controlling him, giving one to everyone in America, so the aliens can take over much more quickly.


How do you all envision the worst case for each one?
Worst case for Trump is nothing less than a World War 3 for me.
 
Another thing to think about is what is the worst-case scenario for each candidate.

For Kamala the worst case is a lame-duck presidency where she kind of doesn't do much of anything. I am expecting something like this. Mostly lame-duck with a few surprises that we didn't expect, like maybe she shows she is a better diplomat than we expected, or maybe she gets some minor bi-partisan thing passed. But generally not much happening is likely her worst case. She isn't a dreaded and terrifying *gasp* "socialist", so we don't have much to worry about there, and she just doesn't have the clout to push much through of consequence. So she might surprise with some kind of executive order or other unexpected thing, but for the most part she is likely to be just boring and not do much.

For Trump the worst case is the continued erosion of our liberties and the continued deconstruction of all of our social platforms. I could see him do what he had to in order to increase the tax cuts for the rich and make them permanent. Then we can add even more to the national debt because huge businesses and billionaires continue to pay a far lower percent in taxes than regular folks, so the middle class gets to eat it again. I could also see him working to extend his term beyond 4 years and, frankly, the worst case scenario there is he refuses to leave office and uses his hand-picked supreme court to support him in that as any suit brought against him, or charge, is buried under the "it's an official act of the president" pile of ****. Civil war is another possible worst case, but I see that more likely if he loses the vote.

For RFK worst case is he starts to propagate the brain worm that is controlling him, giving one to everyone in America, so the aliens can take over much more quickly.


How do you all envision the worst case for each one?
I feel quite certain he gets us to leave NATO

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
The democrat party position is to remove the issue from being open to democracy, and to remove any restrictions so that even women in their 9th month having contractions can stop in a clinic to have their child killed.
well, you are very un educated about the topic, looking same like Trump who was fearmongering that democrats want to abort babies after birth.
Nobody wants to remove any restrictions and certainly nobody wants to allow women to terminate pregnancies in 9th month - unless a fetus is terminally ill and carrying it to term can cause fatal risk to the mother.
We saw what unregulated abortion ban can do to mother - read this and tell me you support law like that in USA and if you do I will lose any little respect I may have had for you.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: PJF
Glad you respect that in a leader. Does that make him an alpha wolf now?
I rarely pop into the General Discussion, but have you all heard the story of how the alpha wolf idea was (mistakenly) created?

This is a very interesting podcast that details how the inventor of the alpha wolf concept has repudiated that idea and has been (fruitlessly) trying to get the idea purged from popular culture. Also deals somewhat with the dangers of trying to apply ideas about nature to human societies.
 
I rarely pop into the General Discussion, but have you all heard the story of how the alpha wolf idea was (mistakenly) created?

This is a very interesting podcast that details how the inventor of the alpha wolf concept has repudiated that idea and has been (fruitlessly) trying to get the idea purged from popular culture. Also deals somewhat with the dangers of trying to apply ideas about nature to human societies.
I have heard of that and I absolutely hate the "alpha" ideology.
 
Nah, you have a racist POS who treats everyone like ****. You dont need to be nice and deal with formalities. Even if you do that it can happen off camera before the interview, Get to the point and ask the important question. WTF should we give you a platform when you have a long history of being racist?
Yeah but common courtesy is to at least say “Hi”.. she at least could have done that.

To me that reflects more badly on her than on him.. and I’m not a Trump supporter.. lol..
 
well, you are very un educated about the topic, looking same like Trump who was fearmongering that democrats want to abort babies after birth.
Democrats broadly speaking do not want to allow abortion after birth, however there are some that do. Trump was referring to the comments made publicly by former Governor of Virginia Ralph Northam. Trump cited who he was quoting and quoted him. You may be aware of the comments in question, but if not, here they are in context:




Nobody wants to remove any restrictions and certainly nobody wants to allow women to terminate pregnancies in 9th month - unless a fetus is terminally ill and carrying it to term can cause fatal risk to the mother.
That may be your personal view, but it is not everyone's.

Alaska has passed laws to remove all restrictions on abortion. So long as it is a licensed physician performing the procedure, a woman in Alaska is allowed to have her unborn child terminated for any reason, or no reason at all, even in the 9th month. There is also no requirement for underage girls to notify parents before having their unborn child terminated.


Colorado has passed laws similar to Alaska except that minors must get parent approval. They are pushing to have that policy enshrined in their state constitution.


Michigan doesn't have restrictions but they do have a 24-hour waiting period and a required counseling session. There are a handful of other states who have also passed laws to remove restrictions on terminating unborn children in the 9th month without any health issues for the fetus or mother. Women do have the freedom to travel from one state to another, and there are a boatload of charities set up to pay for the travel costs of low income pregnant women.

read this and tell me you support law like that in USA and if you do I will lose any little respect I may have had for you.
Read it, and there are no laws like that in the United States. If you have to go back more than a decade and in a foreign country to find your scary example then I think even you might realize you're reaching a bit. Contrary to the scaremongering, women in the United States have a greater access to late tern / partial birth abortion than they did before the Dobbs decision, but as mentioned earlier, some travel might be involved. So far no one has gone as far as former Governor Ralph Northam was suggesting and allowed post-birth abortion, but there are some nuts out there who want it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
Yeah but common courtesy is to at least say “Hi”.. she at least could have done that.

To me that reflects more badly on her than on him.. and I’m not a Trump supporter.. lol..
That's fine for you. I don't think he deserves that respect. He hasn't earned it and doesn't treat people with respect.
 
Lol cool. Show her getting eviscerated by Tulsi Gabbard now
What's stopping you from showing that?
I would take a look

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
That's fine for you. I don't think he deserves that respect. He hasn't earned it and doesn't treat people with respect.
But we should have our standards to adhere to regardless of who he is though right?

I mean why sink down to his level?

Kinda like the butler, Alfred, in Batman.

Notice how he treats everyone from all walks of life with the same politeness and courtesy.
 
Reminds me of you guys. @fishonjazz loooves bullies when it suits his agenda. Huh Trump wannabe fish? Love them!

Kamala Harris the 'soul-destroying bully': Former staff expose shock details of degrading tirades, decades-long 'toxic' behavior that left people in TEARS - and saw them quit at unprecedented levels

Only four of the initial 71 staffers hired by Harris during her first year in office still remain in a job. The rest either quit or were fired, according to analysis by non-partisan watchdog Open The Books.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
Back
Top