What's new

Disney tried to use a Disney+ arbitration clause to block a Wrongful Death suit

I don't know if I made my point well.
You didn't make it well. In fact you kind of shot your own argument in the face.

SJW isn't a synonym for diverse. Most SJWs are white. It is the 'W' part of SJW that makes SJWs so annoying. The corporate mandates you say are ruining the art, that is the 'W'. It isn't marketing types who are pushing the SJ envelope which is why the end product is falling flat.

If you think there should be fewer SJ mandates being handed down by corporate leadership at Disney, then I think most of us are on the same page. I do find it humorous that you think SJWs of 20 years ago wanted more boobs in film.
 
You didn't make it well. In fact you kind of shot your own argument in the face.

SJW isn't a synonym for diverse. Most SJWs are white. It is the 'W' part of SJW that makes SJWs so annoying. The corporate mandates you say are ruining the art, that is the 'W'. It isn't marketing types who are pushing the SJ envelope which is why the end product is falling flat.

If you think there should be fewer SJ mandates being handed down by corporate leadership at Disney, then I think most of us are on the same page. I do find it humorous that you think SJWs of 20 years ago wanted more boobs in film.

I'm saying the same execs that are now "SJWs" were the same guys demanding more boobs 20 years ago. It's the same type of person, trying to jay-walk their way to success. They have no investment if the mandate is more diversity or not, it's just what they think audiences want, derived from some BS focus group testing and their own unearned confidence.

It's not Diversity --> Bad

It's Corporate hands in the creative process --> Bad

It's immaterial what the content of the mandates happen to be, diversity, boobs it's all inorganic and cynical, and hurts the final piece.
 
I'm saying the same execs that are now "SJWs" were the same guys demanding more boobs 20 years ago. It's the same type of person, trying to jay-walk their way to success. They have no investment if the mandate is more diversity or not, it's just what they think audiences want, derived from some BS focus group testing and their own unearned confidence.

It's not Diversity --> Bad

It's Corporate hands in the creative process --> Bad

It's immaterial what the content of the mandates happen to be, diversity, boobs it's all inorganic and cynical, and hurts the final piece.
I'm a child of the 80s (born in the late 70s) and if a movie had an R rating they were going to get their money's worth and that meant boobies. Comedy? Boobies! Romantic comedy? Sex scene with boobies! Action? Boobies! Horror? Boobie jump scares!
 
I'm a child of the 80s (born in the late 70s) and if a movie had an R rating they were going to get their money's worth and that meant boobies. Comedy? Boobies! Romantic comedy? Sex scene with boobies! Action? Boobies! Horror? Boobie jump scares!


Ahhh the good old days....
 
Back
Top