What's new
By:

Kamala Harris for Pres

So Kamala was supposed to be such a bird brain dum dum that she couldn't string two sentences together without notes or a teleprompter. How was she able to pull off the debate performance that she did?

Oh well, I guess I'll just have to consider the track record of the people who said this with supreme confidence when they make future statements.
 
Sardines said:
So Kamala was supposed to be such a bird brain dum dum that she couldn't string two sentences together without notes or a teleprompter. How was she able to pull off the debate performance that she did?

Oh well, I guess I'll just have to consider the track record of the people who said this with supreme confidence when they make future statements.
Click to expand...
Word going around some corners of facebook is that she had an earpiece in and was told, word for word, everything to say at every moment, and even when to laugh. She is such a stupid robot.
 
Pi0XY4X.jpeg
 
Sardines said:
I would say that we have an immigration problem, not a major immigration problem. For instance, I can't think of a single way in which illegal immigration has had a negative impact on my day-to-day life. I can't think of any solid examples of how our nation is being harmed, other than there are people here who many people wish were not here. That seems to be the most significant effect of this supposed "major" problem.
Click to expand...

Yup.

If (pretty big if) immigration is a problem it's a fairly minor one, and not particularly new, the 'problem' has really stayed pretty steady since at least W.
 
default said:
I can understand why half the country prefers Harris over Trump; however, saying that there is not a major immigration problem in our country is a completely false claim.
Click to expand...
Not particularly. The issue lies in a backlogged court system due to increased filings. Otherwise, the increased apprehensions and expulsions means that Border Patrol is doing its job. The primary issue the lack of congressional action because the Mango Moron doesn't believe in bipartisanship. The manufactured crisis makes for a great talking point the "they took our jerbs!" crowd, but it's otherwise ********.
 
Sardines said:
So Kamala was supposed to be such a bird brain dum dum that she couldn't string two sentences together without notes or a teleprompter. How was she able to pull off the debate performance that she did?

Oh well, I guess I'll just have to consider the track record of the people who said this with supreme confidence when they make future statements.
Click to expand...
so you like, saw who her opponent was, right?
 
Sardines said:
So Kamala was supposed to be such a bird brain dum dum that she couldn't string two sentences together without notes or a teleprompter. How was she able to pull off the debate performance that she did?
Click to expand...
She's still a dum dum. No one said she couldn't string two sentences together. The criticism is that she can't speak extemporaneously. That clearly stands. Her debate team spent a week getting her to memorize 20 or so mini-speeches. At the debate, a moderator would ask her a question and she would recite one of her memorized responses. Most of the time, the response didn't address the question asked but the moderators never, never, not a single time, asked a follow up that would have exposed that she was unable to speak beyond what she'd memorized.
 
Al-O-Meter said:
She's still a dum dum. No one said she couldn't string two sentences together. The criticism is that she can't speak extemporaneously. That clearly stands. Her debate team spent a week getting her to memorize 20 or so mini-speeches. At the debate, a moderator would ask her a question and she would recite one of her memorized responses. Most of the time, the response didn't address the question asked but the moderators never, never, not a single time, asked a follow up that would have exposed that she was unable to speak beyond what she'd memorized.
Click to expand...
right, the fact you can beat that idiot in a debate says nothing about your intelligence. it's just the lesser of two retards.
 
seattlejazzfan said:
so you like, saw who her opponent was, right?
Click to expand...
Did her opponent gift her magical speaking abilities that people said she didn't have?

I'm not talking about the fact she won the debate. There is a narrative out there that Kamala is an exceptionally stupid person who couldn't even pass the bar (that she passed) and only rose to the positions she did as DA and AG because she was sleeping with a powerful man (who somehow gave her positions that were elected positions). That she is the VP because of DEI. That she is not smart enough to present information off the cuff and needs nots and teleprompters in order to say anything intelligible at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
Sardines said:
Did her opponent gift her magical speaking abilities that people said she didn't have?

I'm not talking about the fact she won the debate. There is a narrative out there that Kamala is an exceptionally stupid person who couldn't even pass the bar (that she passed) and only rose to the positions she did as DA and AG because she was sleeping with a powerful man (who somehow gave her positions that were elected positions). That she is the VP because of DEI. That she is not smart enough to present information off the cuff and needs nots and teleprompters in order to say anything intelligible at all.
Click to expand...

This is the sound of every conservative collectively moving all of their goalposts. It's their own fault for setting expectations so low.
 
Sardines said:
Did her opponent gift her magical speaking abilities that people said she didn't have?

I'm not talking about the fact she won the debate. There is a narrative out there that Kamala is an exceptionally stupid person who couldn't even pass the bar (that she passed) and only rose to the positions she did as DA and AG because she was sleeping with a powerful man (who somehow gave her positions that were elected positions). That she is the VP because of DEI. That she is not smart enough to present information off the cuff and needs nots and teleprompters in order to say anything intelligible at all.
Click to expand...
oh you thought she was actually impressive. she wasn't. she won the debate because she was debating an imbecile, but she was far from impressive.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top