Do you feel the same way when posters on JF are wanting the shooters to not miss?
That's comparing apples to oranges. Kamala and Joe are not a threat to democracy.
Do you feel the same way when posters on JF are wanting the shooters to not miss?
As we're watching Idiocracy unfold before our eyes? Nah, Fukayama might be right.
Trump would have been a fringe write-in candidate 30 years ago. Dude was endorsed by the KKK—repeatedly—and actually had to think about it. He's now the lead dog of one of two major political parties in this country because people find him charming. Collapse is closer than you think.
That's comparing apples to oranges. Kamala and Joe are not a threat to democracy.
That'd be a large part of it, sure, but only insomuch as it was the mechanism for the fulfillment of daily needs of the populace. The removal of daily struggle for basic requirements for a people bent on governing themselves due to their perpetual and relative wealth when compared to their global neighbors would eventually have this effect anyway because people no longer have a reason to think beyond their daily requirements to sustain their livelihood. Think late-period Imperial Rome when they couldn't even ****bothered about the Visigoths. Not that Rome was capitalistic, but same concept where people just no longer... care.I reckon the destabilising affect of technology coupled with the de-industrialisation of capitalist democracies, corporate media monopolies has a lot more to do with it.
Tell me again how many votes Kamala got to become the nominee? Of the candidates on the ballot, Kamala is the only one to have actually quashed democracy.Kamala and Joe are not a threat to democracy.
Well, I do believe actually assassinating Trump would make matters far, far worse in this country. So it’s good he was not killed. I can understand people willing to say that, though, because the anger from both sides is off the charts altogether. So I cannot very well act surprised with any “wish he had not missed” reactions. If pressed, many likely won’t back down, but others would likely admit, “well, yeah, maybe I shouldn’t say such a thing”. So much anger, I’m not surprised by what people say in anger. On both sides.Do you feel the same way when posters on JF are wanting the shooters to not miss?
Unfortunately they're not a threat to anything, they're just a holding space, they really need to be looking a tearing down the far right with the FBI as soon as possible.
Tell me again how many votes Kamala got to become the nominee? Of the candidates on the ballot, Kamala is the only one to have actually quashed democracy.
Well, I do believe actually assassinating Trump would make matters far, far worse in this country. So it’s good he was not killed. I can understand people willing to say that, though, because the anger from both sides is off the charts altogether. So I cannot very well act surprised with any “wish he had not missed” reactions. If pressed, many likely won’t back down, but others would likely admit, “well, yeah, maybe I shouldn’t say such a thing”. So much anger, I’m not surprised by what people say in anger. On both sides.
We’re already in a cold civil war. For most of my life, politics was often described as “the art of compromise”. That’s long gone now, we are already engaged in a cold civil war. Prefer words to gunshots.
Seems more like the Democrats we’re thinking on their feet, in a one time unexpected event, and we’re overwhelmingly supported by the Democratic electorate…Tell me again how many votes Kamala got to become the nominee? Of the candidates on the ballot, Kamala is the only one to have actually quashed democracy.
Dying of a heart attack is a little different than being blown away by an AK-47.I disagree. Trump dying of a heart attack or by any other manner would immediately give us a reset. It would give cultists who feel trapped an out. A gunman acting alone wouldn't set off riots or the like. There are those who would engage in conspiracy theories but I think things would become much more normal almost instantly of a heart attack is somewhat different than being blown away by an AK-47.
Tell me again how many votes Kamala got to become the nominee? Of the candidates on the ballot, Kamala is the only one to have actually quashed democracy.
Dying of a heart attack is a little different than being blown away by an AK-47.
Yes, it was a one time situation demanding a response. Democrats are rightly concerned about authoritarianism in America. I’m sure there are Biden supporters who did not like what happen. But according to those who don’t like it, the correct response would be: “even though it’s pretty clear now that we likely are far less likely to win the 2024 election, even while we are convinced a Trump victory would constitute an existential crisis, we must adhere to what our constitutes said in the primaries, even if current polling tells us our constitutes are begging us to pick someone else, and quickly! Our constituents are panicking and begging us to do something. Let us wisely ignore them”.Were Trumptards going to vote in a democrat primary? The way I see it the ones who should be complaining are the dems and they seem ok with it.
Which they would do even if trump died of a heart attack. Somehow, to them, if trump died of a heart attack it would be the fault of the deep state leftist Marxist satanistsIf it's a lone insane gunman I think the outcome is the same except for some QAnons engaging in their inevitable conspiracies.
You don't have the first clue how elections or democracy work, do you.Tell me again how many votes Kamala got to become the nominee? Of the candidates on the ballot, Kamala is the only one to have actually quashed democracy.
Well, I would have to disagree, given our present climate. Some in MAGA would come up with conspiracies that Trump was given something to produce a heart attack. Certainly Democrats would be blamed. But, I do not believe the response would be the same. Not even remotely close, IMHO….If it's a lone insane gunman I think the outcome is the same except for some QAnons engaging in their inevitable conspiracies.
The ex-president used the late convicted sex offender’s plane after his own jet developed engine problems
Donald Trump used a plane that was once owned by Jeffrey Epstein, the late disgraced financier and convicted sex offender, to fly to several presidential campaign events last weekend, it has been revealed.
The former president flew on a Gulfstream G-550 jet whose previous ownership was subsequently traced to Epstein after Trump’s own private plane – a Boeing 757 known colloquially as Trump Force One – encountered engine troubles.
The former Epstein jet was emblazoned with the slogan “Trump 2024” for the duration of the ex-president’s use.
That'd be a large part of it, sure, but only insomuch as it was the mechanism for the fulfillment of daily needs of the populace. The removal of daily struggle for basic requirements for a people bent on governing themselves due to their perpetual and relative wealth when compared to their global neighbors would eventually have this effect anyway because people no longer have a reason to think beyond their daily requirements to sustain their livelihood. Think late-period Imperial Rome when they couldn't even ****bothered about the Visigoths. Not that Rome was capitalistic, but same concept where people just no longer... care.
We're pretty much talking about the same thing.