It's a bit ironic that our two best young players where both drafted in the 20's and we traded away 3 picks that will likely be in the 20's for a chance at a top 10 pick, and our two top 10 picks are arguably our worse young players.
I hadn't seen this one yet. Fears has some nice moves here.
View: https://youtu.be/qALV2R63Y3s?si=ky5bTQfGCeAe9jIP
He's mostly struggled in SEC play, but so have most of the young guards in the SEC. It's a really tough league for guards.Im fully out on Fears as any kind of draft target. Even if the worst case scenario happens and the Jazz are drafting 8.
Yeah, to be clear, I'm not out on him as a player, I just dont view him as a piece to add on the Jazz. At 8 there will be players who are the same tier but better fits.He's mostly struggled in SEC play, but so have most of the young guards in the SEC. It's a really tough league for guards.
I never got too high on Fears, so he hasn't dropped that far for me. I wouldn't take him for the Jazz, but I think he could still be a good player in the league.
I hadn't seen this one yet. Fears has some nice moves here.
View: https://youtu.be/qALV2R63Y3s?si=ky5bTQfGCeAe9jIP
Wolf joins CMB and Queen as the trio of skilled big guys that I have no idea how they translate to the NBA.
If Wolf translates he could blow the doors off the league and I’m not sure that I’m trolling at all here.Wolf joins CMB and Queen as the trio of skilled big guys that I have no idea how they translate to the NBA.
It’s an interesting observation. What I would counter with is that - at this stage - we will not be rostering 3+ rookies per year, having now done that in consecutive years. And, even if the Jazz are better at drafting later than earlier, it doesn’t change the value question which still matters if the Jazz put their earlier picks on the market.It's a bit ironic that our two best young players where both drafted in the 20's and we traded away 3 picks that will likely be in the 20's for a chance at a top 10 pick, and our two top 10 picks are arguably our worse young players.
Yeah, Im not doubting the move. It's smart, it's just funny how it works out sometimes.It’s an interesting observation. What I would counter with is that - at this stage - we will not be rostering 3+ rookies per year, having now done that in consecutive years. And, even if the Jazz are better at drafting later than earlier, it doesn’t change the value question which still matters if the Jazz put their earlier picks on the market.