What's new
By:

Trump Dictatorship and All Things Politics

*Adding on to my above.

I strongly believe it was the Waltz fat-fingers scenario.

I can't believe anyone competent would burn having access to Waltz's info/communications on something like this - needing to hope they say something incriminating in a few days time period whilst not checking who's in the chat for it to be more than a sidenote story (if it was a meme group chat the collective response would be - this is stupid).
 
Red said:
Goldberg has released the texts describing the war plans that Hegseth said were never released. What choice did Gokdberg have, with 3 cabinet members denying war plans or classified info was discussed? Just happened I guess, can’t find any articles as yet….
Click to expand...
If it’s fake news or not classified, then Donald’s admin shouldn’t have any problem with this. After all, it’s all fake/not classified
 
Eminence said:
*Adding on to my above.

I strongly believe it was the Waltz fat-fingers scenario.

I can't believe anyone competent would burn having access to Waltz's info/communications on something like this - needing to hope they say something incriminating in a few days time period whilst not checking who's in the chat for it to be more than a sidenote story (if it was a meme group chat the collective response would be - this is stupid).
Click to expand...
Exactly. You'd have to go through some incredible mental gymnastics to make any sense out of a conspiracy to gain access to the chat. Especially when there's a readily available explanation that's supported by the fact that NONE OF THEM NOTICED GOLDBERG WAS IN THE CHAT: These aren't serious people, and they are all in way above their heads.
 
Eminence said:
I'm not sure it'd be any better.

As is I can see a scenario where this was 'just' Waltz fat fingering and nobody was really monitoring these areas prior because it wasn't seen as a serious communication channel (didn't believe they could be this incompetent). Possible to bounce back from (starting by cleaning house at the top).

The alternative of a random well connected journalist knowing about it and being able to social engineer his way in or being gifted access by someone with access to Waltzs account, then 100% China/etc had all the relevant info as well and our top levels of defense are completely compromised to a point I don't think we could come back from.
Click to expand...
I think it would be better only in the sense that it would be a less funny explanation, and maybe less personally embarrassing for those involved. A security breach due to the actions of a bad actor is a little bit less memeable than a security breach due to rank incompetence.
 
LogGrad98 said:
Sad but true.
Click to expand...
Why would it be sad? Dems never locked up hitlery. What about Benghazi? What about Obama? What about Susan Rice? Was she perfect? Why are Democrat party given such a free pass on everything but we republicans are supposed to have standards?

Pete is doing a great job. He’s putting the military back to sleep from woke and DEI and CRT and renaming bases with the same name of patriotic confederate generals (but naming them after World War I and II generals so not racist tee hee). He’s also serving the greatest leader ever. And he’s a good family man on his third marriage and has dozens of children spread out throughout the world from all of his marriages and rapes.

I’m tired of libs complaining.

We need to bomb the **** out of Houtasia. And lock up that lib scumbags journalist who reported this chat. Besides, what’s wrong with sharing information with our most important allies, Russia and China?
 
Zombie said:
Exactly. You'd have to go through some incredible mental gymnastics to make any sense out of a conspiracy to gain access to the chat. Especially when there's a readily available explanation that's supported by the fact that NONE OF THEM NOTICED GOLDBERG WAS IN THE CHAT: These aren't serious people, and they are all in way above their heads.
Click to expand...
But it won’t matter because we have the house and senate. Even if you had the house, you wouldn’t have a super majority in the senate to convict! Donald and his regime can do whatever they want. In your face libs!

Maybe the lesser of two evils was better than the evil dictator guy? I know Harris sometimes laughed funny but man…
 
enchilada_style said:

View: https://bsky.app/profile/davidpakman.bsky.social/
Click to expand...


View: https://bsky.app/profile/davidpakman.bsky.social/post/3llci2rr6lc2l

It’s funny how the propagandist whose post PJF shared actually included this very screenshot that disproves his assertion, knowing that a lot of people will either not see it in the middle of the thread, or having been primed that it’s “just a conversation,” not think critically about what they are actually seeing.

If I were a Trump supporter, I’d be embarrassed that Mr. Farrash and other apologists have such a low opinion of my intelligence that something like this would work. Of course, in PJF’s case, they are right to think so.
 
Fosto said:
This country has no basic values. The fascists have always been around in large numbers. A large percentage of us have always celebrated white supremacists, fascists, segregationists, and ethnic cleansers. We've put Andrew ****ing Jackson on our money ffs.

Some of us have aspirations for a just and compassionate society. Many of us don't.
Click to expand...
No values? Your a libtard.

At least this regime has saved you from pronouns and woke. And a black woman from being your president. Ya know? Cuz black woman, get it? DEI

#MAGA
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top