What's new

Do you want the Jazz to win their last game against the Wolves?

Do you want the Jazz to win their last game against the Wolves?

  • Yes

    Votes: 27 52.9%
  • No

    Votes: 16 31.4%
  • Don't care

    Votes: 8 15.7%

  • Total voters
    51
Besides winning, we should try to make Edwards pissed and get a tech before the play in ;)
Honestly, telling the young guys it's the last game of the year and to full court press all game would be fun. He'd probably cook them, but would increase the chance of pissing him off and getting a tech so he has to miss the playin game against Memphis
 
The point of this season is increasing odds at the top of the draft. Winning actually helps with that.
-If the Jazz win, that increases their chances at a lottery pick, however small.
-the Jazz will probably lose anyway
-the chances that the Jazz pick 6th if they win is relatively low
It increases a shot at that happening. A win against the Wolves doesn't guarantee they lose the play in games.

I'm on the side of winning, but losing is probably the best move statistically
 
It increases a shot at that happening. A win against the Wolves doesn't guarantee they lose the play in games.

I'm on the side of winning, but losing is probably the best move statistically

Just thinking out loud here...

I think Minnesota would have like a 30% chance of losing to Memphis and maybe a 20% chance of losing to Dallas or Sacramento. That's like a 6% chance they get in the lottery vs 10% increase in odds at falling to 6.
 
Just thinking out loud here...

I think Minnesota would have like a 30% chance of losing to Memphis and maybe a 20% chance of losing to Dallas or Sacramento. That's like a 6% chance they get in the lottery vs 10% increase in odds at falling to 6
Subjective and objective probability are two different things.
 
Do I have this right?:
  • If Minny loses 3 straight games they're highly motivated and heavily favored to win (including against us, the worst team in the league, one that hasn't shown any signs of legitimate life for several weeks), then their pick for us will be a lottery pick (#14), and our Flagg odds will increase to 14.7% chance (from 14%), and our top 4 odds will increase from 52.1% to 55.5%.
  • If we beat them but they win one of their play-in games, their pick will be anywhere from 18 to 21, depending on the last day's games and tiebreakers
  • If they beat us, then their pick is anywhere from 20 to 24, again depending on final game and tiebreakers
 
Do I have this right?:
  • If Minny loses 3 straight games they're highly motivated and heavily favored to win (including against us, the worst team in the league, one that hasn't shown any signs of legitimate life for several weeks), then their pick for us will be a lottery pick (#14), and our Flagg odds will increase to 14.7% chance (from 14%), and our top 4 odds will increase from 52.1% to 55.5%.
  • If we beat them but they win one of their play-in games, their pick will be anywhere from 18 to 21, depending on the last day's games and tiebreakers
  • If they beat us, then their pick is anywhere from 20 to 24, again depending on final game and tiebreakers
That sounds about right, although I haven't looked that closely at tie breaker scenarios.
 
It increases a shot at that happening. A win against the Wolves doesn't guarantee they lose the play in games.

I'm on the side of winning, but losing is probably the best move statistically
This is all about odds. There is a 0% chance they miss the playoffs if they win, basically.
 
This is all about odds. There is a 0% chance they miss the playoffs if they win, basically.
I understand, but your giving up odds if you win?

If you are tied with the Wizards for worst record, then there is some kind of tie breaker based on record, or is it a coin flip? Either way, there is something that the Jazz are potentially giving up by winning.
 
The Wolves have to win this to avoid a play in
Jazz are not playing any starters
Wolves may play everyone including Edwards
It's at Minnesota Will be a shocker if Wolves can't win this
 
OK, let's look at this logically:

Jazz winJazz lose
Wizards winTied for last placeJazz have sole possession of last place
Wizards loseWizards have sole possession of last placeTied for last place

And the actual odds for each pick: If we end up tied, there is a 50% chance of either #1 or 2 on this.

Seed 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th 13th 14th
1 14.00% 13.42% 12.75% 11.97% 47.86% - - - - - - - - -
2 14.00% 13.42% 12.75% 11.97% 27.84% 20.02% - - - - - - - -

So, as someone else said, the only difference on this side is that if we're tied, we have a 10% chance of moving down to #6. If the Wizard are in last, that's a 20% chance.

If the Timberwolves lose, then there is a 25% chance (just going on straight W/L odds, not calculating them) that they will be in the lottery, but probably at the #14. That would give them the following chances:

14 5 0.50% 0.56% 0.63% 0.72% - - - - - - - - - 97.59%

To me, a 25% chance of moving a garbage pick to a 2.5% chance of a higher pick... it's just not worth it. I mean, unless it pans out, in which case, wow...

So, I say we should lose it.
 
With the way the mocks are now, there are two guys (Fleming and Beringer) thought to available at 20, I have in the lottery, so I wouldn't be too pressed about 14 vs 20.
 
I don't believe this at all. There is no way ace or vj drop to 6th. You may have an argument about the talent drop off at 5 or 6 but I believe the talent drop off starts heavily at 6. A lot of people don't like Johnson but he will definitely fit in on any team that takes him. If the jazz fall to 6th, it would be a devastating season overall
We aren't scouting experts by any means but just looking at the websites/experts that do scouting for a living, I don't think any of them agree on the notion of VJ/Ace/Tre being ranked in consensus top 5 above everyone not named Flagg or Harper. Not yet at least.


View: https://youtu.be/vy3_GMcIYTg?si=XDwz2rn4Ip-qfOMf
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250412-175745.png
    Screenshot_20250412-175745.png
    192.1 KB · Views: 6
  • Screenshot_20250412-175732.png
    Screenshot_20250412-175732.png
    536.3 KB · Views: 6
People put too much trust in the experts declaring a draft four-deep or five-deep. The experts are always wrong. You can google and see that there was an expert consensus that Fultz is the number one pick and that Josh Jackson is a tip-5 pick - and that in the draft were Mitchell was drafted at 13, Adebayo at 14, Markkanen at 7 and Jarred Allen at 22. And that is true pretty much for every draft.
 
Back
Top