What's new

Following potential 2012 draftees

Is it realistic to call Beal a slightly slower, better shooting version of Westbrook?

I'm just not sure about Beal. Before this season started I thought he would be an assassin. He's obviously still very young, but I've not been overwhelmed by any part of his game so far. Great rebounder, actually, but I have yet to see his shot fall. I'd call Westbrook much faster. I suspect that Beal will find his shot, but if he doesn't get his perimeter shooting to a consistent high 30's, at a minimum, then I see him as a mediocre player, at best.

EDIT: Just wanted to mention he's shooting 32.8% from 3 and 42.6% overall.
 
I'm just not sure about Beal. Before this season started I thought he would be an assasin. He's obviously still very young, but I've not been overwhelmed by any part of his game so far. Great rebounder, actually, but I have yet to see his shot fall. I'd call Westbrook much faster. I suspect that Beal will find his shot, but if he doesn't get his perimeter shooting to a consistent high 30's, at a minimum, then I see him as a mediocre player, at best.

This is my concern as well.
 
Here are Westbrook's college stats:

College Year GP GS SPG BPG RPG APG PPG FG% FT% 3P%
UCLA 2006-07 36 1 0.4 0.02 0.8 0.7 3.4 .457% .548% .409%
UCLA 2007-08 39 34 1.6 0.2 3.9 4.3 12.7 .465% .713% .338%

Here are Beal's stats so far:

TEAM MIN FG% 3P% FT% REB AST BLK STL TO PTS
FLA 33.8 .426 .328 .758 6.2 2.0 0.8 1.3 2.2 14.3

I tried to connect the different stats with bold.
 
Been saying this all season, but Davis just gets better by the game ..

In his last 4 games;
71 points
30 rebounds
26 blocks
5 assists
4 steals
3 turnovers
9 fouls (pretty incredible to block 26 shots and only have 9 fouls)
69% FG
87% FT
 
Here are Westbrook's college stats:

College Year GP GS SPG BPG RPG APG PPG FG% FT% 3P%
UCLA 2006-07 36 1 0.4 0.02 0.8 0.7 3.4 .457% .548% .409%
UCLA 2007-08 39 34 1.6 0.2 3.9 4.3 12.7 .465% .713% .338%

Here are Beal's stats so far:

TEAM MIN FG% 3P% FT% REB AST BLK STL TO PTS
FLA 33.8 .426 .328 .758 6.2 2.0 0.8 1.3 2.2 14.3

I tried to connect the different stats with bold.

Westbrook played at UCLA. It's generally regarded UCLA players have much lower stats than most other college players due to the style of play. Also, 4.3 APG is a lot more than 2.
 
Westbrook played at UCLA. It's generally regarded UCLA players have much lower stats than most other college players due to the style of play. Also, 4.3 APG is a lot more than 2.

I wasn't saying that Beal is better, I was posting that information for an understanding.
 
I wasn't saying that Beal is better, I was posting that information for an understanding.

My point wasn't about who is better, it was that Beal isn't a PG by any stretch of the imagination. Westbrook has always been a PG (maybe not pure, but I don't consider him a combo either).
 
I'm a huge supporter of Beal and would love him on the Jazz. He's got a very dynamic game, and to me, has "it". Although his shot has been inconsistent this season, I believe it will come back. He shot like 50% from 3 his senior year of high school. Trust me, we'd be very lucky to land this kid.
 
I'm a huge supporter of Beal and would love him on the Jazz. He's got a very dynamic game, and to me, has "it". Although his shot has been inconsistent this season, I believe it will come back. He shot like 50% from 3 his senior year of high school. Trust me, we'd be very lucky to land this kid.

Let's be a little more conservative on handing out the its' hmm? Every player can't have it. We are starting to dilute its' meaning.
 
Let's be a little more conservative on handing out the its' hmm? Every player can't have it. We are starting to dilute its' meaning.

I don't think I, or anyone else here, has overused the term "it" to describe players in this draft. I know it may seem that way with Rivers' recent game against UNC, but who have you honestly seen described as having "it"? (go and find quotes; if it's as overused as you claim, then it shouldn't be hard :P)
 
Okay, the subject is 'it.' Here's who I think has the 'it' factor in the lottery (in order of ittitude).

Austin Rivers


Anthony Davis
MKG
Thomas Robinson

I could be convinced it's really only Rivers.
 
Okay, the subject is 'it.' Here's who I think has the 'it' factor in the lottery (in order of ittitude).

Austin Rivers


Anthony Davis
MKG
Thomas Robinson

I could be convinced it's really only Rivers.

My list looks the same, only I'd add Beal, and I can't really say about Robinson cause I haven't seen enough of him. Miller is someone I MIGHT give the "it" label, as well.
 
Back
Top