I've seen no evidence that Al Jefferson's moves are more polished in any way, shape, or form. And just because he commands more double-teams because he's played on a ****** teams doesn't mean he's any better or worse than someone that got them less.
And Jefferson was considered a liability on D even on one of the worst defensive teams in the NBA. He's terrible.
I did not come the conclusion of "Al Jefferson is a better post threat than Boozer" from "Big Al commands more double teams". I believe that way because what I watched during some regular season games gave me an idea and chance to compare both players who are considered among top offensive big men of today's game.
- One would have hard time to prove that playing in a terrible team helps players get more lucrative stats or the exact opposite. By this logic, we can also attribute his some weaknesses such as passing to him playing with scrubs. That does not lead us to anything concrete.
- We know that Carlos' inside points do not generally come from his one-on-one post plays, in which he uses his footwork on his way to near basket, or he makes quick back to basket moves. His high arching J's, fadeaways around 15-20 Foot, and most importantly designed, practised and perfectly utilized Pick'n roll plays, which constitute the Jazz offense in which PG and PF are main actors. We also know Carlos does escape from physical contact time to time. AS long as his J's are falling, there's no problem. However, against bigger and longer frontcourts, we saw from first hand that Carlos not only did not dominate (even be a factor) in the painted area, he struggled with his Js. If he really had such polished post moves (why could not I see them?), how could someone explain me this:
"56% of Jefferson's possessions came on post ups last year, compare that to Boozer who had 21% of his possessions on postups." (
https://twitter.com/lockedonsports). Carlos is our first option, our basically unique post presence but somehow only 21% of his POSSESSIONS (attention, not points) came from post ups. While Jefferson is not as good as Boozer from the perimeter, he does have a more reliable inside game than him. I really like his back-to-the-basket game
- Al Jefferson is terrible in your opinion. However, let me remind you that when you bashed the front office for giving Memo a new contract and I insisted that at that time there were 20+ centers that got paid more than him, and insisted that he was (an is) a top8-10 center, one of players you and some other objectors would put in top5-6 list was Al Jefferson. What has changed so far?
- I ,personally, would rather do nothing, add some young, promising players at much cheaper price than do a major trade like this. I though, in long term, we could get an all-around bigman who can play both sides of floor pretty well, during the process which I would call "mini-rebuilding". Because I do not think Al-Jeff will solve most of our major problems ( Even if he is a better defender than THE MATADOR). However, I'm not against thşs trade because my prediction is all about speculation. A lot of fans wanted a big move and we got one of the better bigmen in the NBA, who gives us a great flexibilty and variations upfront. I'm not pumped up but I would rather have Jefferson with this contract than Boozer with his own contract.
- In my opinion, he is a better inside scoring big man than CArlos. He, I hope, will even be more productive while playing with the best PG in the game + in a better coached team which actually has a system.
- nobody can argue about the positive effect of JAZZ SYSTEM and D-Will on efficiency and stats of Boozer. A PF oriented system that is run by an elite PG does not hurt, right? Let's hope it will also help Al Jeff.