LOL @ Global Warming
- Thread starter TroutBum
- Start date
I see the Kiribati rascals are still at it. Their claims don't seem to be consistent with what's known of global warming. There is a chance the chunk of crust the islands are located on is sinking. There is a chance they're trolling. There is a chance what they're saying it true as well, of course.
https://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/nz-research-shows-pacific-islands-not-shrinking-3577883
https://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/nz-research-shows-pacific-islands-not-shrinking-3577883
Say ol' chap, do you know how long that record is? About one third as long as the [claimied] record on homo sexuality, at best. I'm not so sure we should formulate destructive policy around such a short sample.
Leading scietific minds agree* so let us spare it.
*with me as usual
larryselbows
Banned
Global Warming is fact. It is well-established and incontrovertible. Science has moved past asking if global warming is happening (yes) as well as if it is at least in part caused by man (YES). Scientists are now trying to establish the sensitivity of the climate system to increasing temperatures.
Last edited:
Your just a lib loser communist who likes to kill babies and queers. While im here, FIRE KOC!
larryselbows
Banned
:'(
larryselbows
Banned
Don't worry, I won't go into any other liberal scientific conspiracies like gravity, outer space, or reality.
I do think that the public debate is a little extreme on both ends of the spectrum. The current public forum should shift away from questions that already have a definitive answer to more of a moral debate, which science simply cannot answer. An example of such a question would be "With the knowledge that global warming exists, and that global warming is a side-effect of modern society, how much change are we willing to incur as stewards to the environment and to our own rational human needs (strong economy, transportation, raw goods, etc.)?"
I think if a person were to honestly assess this question, it would surprise many of us how much common ground we would all have on this matter.
I wouldn't waste my breath. The coming crisis is no longer avoidable, and I personally welcome it. When we start running out of resources in the midst of an unprecedented environmental collapse, the denialists will fade to irrelevancy, and we will no longer be talking about "economic realities". The current system is deeply entrenched, and the populace were lulled into indifference through material comfort. It is too late for any meaningful reforms, and I do not care for forcing sustainability on a reluctant audience. A serious crisis is exactly what we need.
larryselbows
Banned
I'm not advocating either way, all I am saying is that the issue is complex. We all want a good life which includes a nice job, a nice house, a nice family, I can go on. But the reality is that in order to have those things, we must use various forms of hydrocarbons. Petroleum is and will continue to be firmly entrenched as our energy source and source of many raw materials. I believe very few would be willing to give that up for an anomaly that has unclear consequences. That said, I don't think we should go on spewing enormous amounts of hazardous gases into the atmosphere. We have to be mindful of our actions environmentally while being sensible and realistic in our approach.
The problem is far worse than most realize. We're running out of many essential resources. We're even running out of phosphorous, which was once thought impossible. Even helium is almost gone due to excessive balloon usage. The global economy is, without a doubt, heading into a serious crisis in the next 3 decades. And it will be much worse than any of the small sacrifices that would've been needed during the transition to a more sustainable system. Global warming will simply begin to seriously hurt at the same time as those other challenges, making things worse.
larryselbows
Banned
I agree, it is a terrible thing that we are using up resources at the rate we are.
But just how bad is global warming? The global average increase in temperature since the industrial revolution is 0.5 degrees Celsius. So what does that mean and how does it affect us? The winter climate of the North American continent is controlled the Pacific/North American climate oscillation system which can cause average temperatures to vary by up to 3 degrees Celsius, much more than the man-caused 0.5 degree increase. Remember that this is a natural climate system. El Nino, the North Atlantic Oscillation, and various monsoons have even more drastic effects on the global climate. They are also natural climate events.
Now that is not to say that human induced global warming has had no effect thus far. Obviously massive amounts of sea ice is melting in the Arctic, climate patterns are becoming more erratic, and ocean acidification is a real concern. But how does one rank these worries relative to world hunger, the floundering economy, healthcare, etc.
Like I said it's complex and not easily defined.
WOW.
LOL.
I see some really intelligent comments in here that telegraph to my perceptive social climate receptors that we've been over this issue about a zillion times already. Maybe I should get really serious and try to straighten you all out, once and for all.
But no, I see instead a great opportunity to expand the sphere of governance to ensure that all-wise, infallible scientists, social engineers, and UN-elite hangers-on will have unlimited scope for stepping in to do all the right things. We not only need to revolutionize our global carbon-based economic engines with new multi-trillion-dollar windfalls for the movers and shakers who have the foresight to know what the future of mankind should be by issuing novel forms of "wealth" like "carbon-credits", we should throw out even larger disruptions of ordinary commerce and power for the huge globally-sanctioned politically-useful, and equally-valid issues of global reality, global gravity, and global delusions of the outer space, which man is certainly having a huge negative impact on.
What I need to know is how I can personally put myself in a lucrative position to privately profit from all the gravity credits, space credits, and reality credits our world governance system needs to issue to correct these problems.
I just want to be as smart as Al Gore, OK????? Is that too much to ask????? In exchange for saving the world from mankind?????
It's not like we haven't used a lot of economic bubble fantasies before to allow progressive thinkers to get rich at the expense of the more timid and backward folks who just get in on a good thing at the wrong time.
LOL.
I see some really intelligent comments in here that telegraph to my perceptive social climate receptors that we've been over this issue about a zillion times already. Maybe I should get really serious and try to straighten you all out, once and for all.
But no, I see instead a great opportunity to expand the sphere of governance to ensure that all-wise, infallible scientists, social engineers, and UN-elite hangers-on will have unlimited scope for stepping in to do all the right things. We not only need to revolutionize our global carbon-based economic engines with new multi-trillion-dollar windfalls for the movers and shakers who have the foresight to know what the future of mankind should be by issuing novel forms of "wealth" like "carbon-credits", we should throw out even larger disruptions of ordinary commerce and power for the huge globally-sanctioned politically-useful, and equally-valid issues of global reality, global gravity, and global delusions of the outer space, which man is certainly having a huge negative impact on.
What I need to know is how I can personally put myself in a lucrative position to privately profit from all the gravity credits, space credits, and reality credits our world governance system needs to issue to correct these problems.
I just want to be as smart as Al Gore, OK????? Is that too much to ask????? In exchange for saving the world from mankind?????
It's not like we haven't used a lot of economic bubble fantasies before to allow progressive thinkers to get rich at the expense of the more timid and backward folks who just get in on a good thing at the wrong time.
Hey, I've already invented the "Carbon Credit Home Production Kit". I'm just waiting on the patent now. My infomercial is going to start out like this: "Are you tired of paying too much for Carbon Credits? Have you had to wait too long for them to be delivered? Introducing "The Home Carbon Credit Production Kit"! Now you can join in on the emerging market of creating Carbon Credits. (Why should Al Gore have all the fun?) With this easy to use kit, you will be able to create Carbon Credits to use at your home, office or wherever you may be. Now you can produce Carbon Credits for yourself, family and friends. Carbon Credits make great Christmas and birthday gifts. (Camera shows small kid excitedly opening birthday present that is overflowing with carbon credits.) If you forget to turn off your Carbon Credit machine and accidentally produce too many Carbon Credits then you can always sell them to people who are to stupid to buy their own Carbon Credit maker.
I'll probably throw in something about if you buy now I'll throw in the travel size carbon credit maker for free, you just have to pay the extra shipping and handling costs.
I'm gonna be rich, bitch!
I'll probably throw in something about if you buy now I'll throw in the travel size carbon credit maker for free, you just have to pay the extra shipping and handling costs.
I'm gonna be rich, bitch!