My bad. You were speaking a lot for me so I just made that assumption.
I made one guess (and noted it as a guess) based off a pattern. That is not speaking for you.
My bad. You were speaking a lot for me so I just made that assumption.
So basically you are saying you do not believe Christ existed... or that he was the Son of God because you do not believe that God would have any similar characteristics as a human would?
This is why you threw the word allegedly into my post all over the place, you don't believe it because you cannot reconcile a Son of God coming down and living among humans and exhibiting some human like characteristics?
How about you think about it backwards then. If God is our Father, then to me it makes sense, that as his children we would have at least some of His characteristics. I say we have some of His characteristics, to go along with any other characteristics we pick up.
It's okay if we disagree.
Yes, we can disagree.
And, how could I possibly be ignorant of ^that^ argument? It's everywhere.
Hey I'm not going to assume you know or believe anything.
We can both think the other person is crazy. And the I don't believe God is our Father argument is everywhere too. Maybe even more these days.
It's just not something I come to expect out of the typical bishop is all. There's a stigma that goes with poker & being around people drinking is often frowned upon. I grew up in the Utah County Bubble and am more used to LDS folks who would "feel the dark spirit" in GF's basement than I am to the kind who are less uptight about stuff like this. For example, a good chunk of my family won't step a foot on the Las Vegas strip because it feels sinful to them.
As to your father, I wouldn't have anything but good things to say about him. He's the good natured type of person that everyone likes to be around. My comment was directed more toward LDS stereotypes and wasn't really about your father. I could have inserted you or Archie or Conan if he were to ever show up and the point would essentially be the same.
p.s. I hope he busts you reading this at work._
I'm going to go ahead and go back to the original question, but answer it as a Christian instead of a Mormon. No, I could/would not marry somebody that didn't have the same belief system as me...same goes for dating. My faith is the most important thing to me in my life, I want to be able to share that with my future wife.
now you can carry on.
Good for you, tater. Rep'd, if I have any left.
This is probably the stupidest post I've ever seen you write. (putting in "ALLEGEDLY" before all of Spaz's sentences) Rep'd accordingly.
So it's okay to make nearly 20 pages of babble that all operates under the assumption that God is human-like, then took human form as he walked among us? I'd neg 20 all that **** if I had enough to go around.
The respectful thing to do is to talk about what God ALLEGEDLY did... at let other people have their opinion.
Give me a ****ing break. And **** off, Trout.
I'm going to go ahead and go back to the original question, but answer it as a Christian instead of a Mormon. No, I could/would not marry somebody that didn't have the same belief system as me...same goes for dating. My faith is the most important thing to me in my life, I want to be able to share that with my future wife.
What's interesting is I haven't seen anyone disrespect your beliefs as much as you have for theirs. Whatever, but just an observation.
Perfect answer.
So it's okay to make nearly 20 pages of babble that all operates under the assumption that God is human-like, then took human form as he walked among us? I'd neg 20 all that **** if I had enough to go around.
The respectful thing to do is to talk about what God ALLEGEDLY did... at let other people have their opinion.
Give me a ****ing break. And **** off, Trout.
@ PKM. ^ case. point ^
I'm glad there has been several instances for people to recognize themselves here. And pat backs. Mormons and Christians finding their brothers in 23 pages. Nobody has learned much, alas.
Dear Gordon, please tell me that TaterBoob is back.
nobody has even bothered to understand mine. I've been looking for places to have a conversation, and in those moments have shared a bit of what I think. The rest of the time we've just been assuming some Christian narrative or common-sense Christian ethic like that was the most natural ****ing thing imaginable.
But, why don't you reference exactly where I was disrespectful. Then, why don't you point out where I said something specific about my beliefs and that was followed up by a response of ANY kind (don't act like dismissal or silence is a sign of respect). I mean, you should be able to do at least that, right?
So it's okay to make nearly 20 pages of babble that all operates under the assumption that God is human-like, then took human form as he walked among us? I'd neg 20 all that **** if I had enough to go around.
The respectful thing to do is to talk about what God ALLEGEDLY did... at let other people have their opinion.
Give me a ****ing break. And **** off, Trout.
07-05-2012 11:13 PM
NAOS
Thread: Question for Mormons
we were going along peacefully without you, *******
Like I said, you're a ****ing moron and a walking parody. Drop the "I'm practically a professor and have studied every text available, while sipping latte's at Starbucks between 9 hour sessions of WoW" bit, it's obnoxious.The respectful thing to do is to talk about what God ALLEGEDLY did... at let other people have their opinion.
Essentially, if people don't agree with you, then they're wrong. Got it. I do the same thing all the time, the only difference being that I'm always right. You're a ****ing moron.
Carry on.
Posts like this tend to work against you when you're trying to have educational religious discourse with people who have beliefs different to yours. I know I tend to get along with most of the resident Mo's perfectly fine, despite being far from one.