spycam1
Well-Known Member
Admitted. Doesn't happen often, but kudos to the skank that beat me.
That's right.
Rep me, bitch.
Admitted. Doesn't happen often, but kudos to the skank that beat me.
Dal/PKM is the new Cy/PKM
Was for awhile .. but I've taken a turn for more serious conversation recently. I'm upgrading and looking for a more intellectually rewarding experience while visiting the forum.
No, PKM and I never had sexual overtones to our conversations.
PKM and Dalamon would be a beautiful wedding.
PKM and Dalamon would be a beautiful wedding.
That's marriage inequality.
Because no one would be happier than those two. And that's just not fair!
Okay, I'll chime in (despite my better judgement), but if you're asking for my opinion:
I think the concept of Civil Union should be adequate or can be made adequate to protect the unalienable rights of same-sex couples. To me, what you're really asking is for the state to make a declaration that homosexuality is a life choice that is as valid and worthy of recognition as a traditional marriage. I personally don't agree with this. I think homosexuality is ultimately unhealthy both physically and mentally, and that it should be tolerated rather than celebrated by the state. I'm not here to criticize homosexuals. Nobody's perfect here. But no society that I'm aware of has openly celebrated homosexuality to the point of putting it on par with the sacred institution of marriage. I see same-sex couples as more of a living arrangement than a functional and healthy way to start a family. /opinion.
Marriage doesn't always have to = family. Some heterosexual couples don't want kids, some can't have kids. Doesn't stop them from making the life-long commitment to each other.
It kind of hurts to hera you say that homosexuality is unhealthy physically and mentally, and that it should be tolerated rather than treated equally. We're not looking to be 'celebrated'-- just on the same level as everyone else.
Also, there's no such thing as a sacred institution of marriage. Please don't pretend that it's always been about one man, and one woman. Its never been about two women, or two men, not that I know of-- but come on.
![]()
Also, on the subject of gay parents-- two male parents or two female parents are ALWAYS better than no parents at all.
Maybe I just have a skewed perception of what orphanages are like from watching Oliver as a kid, but I figure two people who will love and support you throughout your entire life is always better than having none.
....and yes, I believe marriage is a sacred institution, or is supposed to be. Just because some marriages are not treated that way doesn't mean the institution of marriage itself should be belittled.
As i said in my post i know gay people and are friends with them. I think gay pride parades/festivals are a great idea, but couldn't there be gay pride parades where you get together and hold hands and have some beers, wine coolers, mixed drinks maybe dance around a bit, sing.... just not so over-the-top and as you said flamboyant. I just think that the gay community would be better serving thier cause for equality/acceptance if they toned it down a bit.
I actually have straight friends that go to pride, and maybe i would even go but there is just too much wierd **** going on.
^ Dumbass. The End.
Equal rights for every human being. Period.
Exactly. You should see my cousin. I'm thinking about pursuing that.