What's new

White student union proposed at Towson University

Fine, just take your ball and go, then.

Seriously, I understand you not wanting to defend this particular group.

I never said I was leaving the conversation. I jsut reject your notion that any white only group has to be about defending "white rights".

Not every black only group has to be about defending "black rights".

It can be any number of things. To me the notion that you atuomatically assume they are racist is in itself a racist thought process.
 
Fine, just take your ball and go, then.

Seriously, I understand you not wanting to defend this particular group.

And you're surprised? He does this on average 3 times a day. Then he'll claim that he has you on his ignore list while responding to your posts at a greater rate than ever before.

it's truly entertaining!
 
I never said I was leaving the conversation. I just reject your notion that any white only group has to be about defending "white rights".

I don't recall making that assertion. I do recall specifically, implicitly agreeing otherwise. If you are not leaving the conversation, will you answer my question, or otherwise explain why it's wrong to assume this particular student group, since they have themselves declared they are defending white right, is racist?
 
I have no business responding here as I haven't read the thread, at all.

I am curious, though, why if a group of blacks are defending their rights it's nothing. Whites defending their rights is racist?
Are the gays advocating for equal rights bigots against heteros?

Sorry, I'm probably way off base here. If so, just ignore me. No malice intended.
 
I am curious, though, why if a group of blacks are defending their rights it's nothing. Whites defending their rights is racist?
Are the gays advocating for equal rights bigots against heteros?

The difference is that being white already gives you better interactions and opportunities in dozens of small ways, most of which you don't even notice, while being black/gay has the opposite effect. That's why white rights don't needs groups to defend them; the culture is already doing that.
 
explain why it's wrong to assume this particular student group, since they have themselves declared they are defending white right, is racist?

If you consider this group racist for that mission, you also have to consider the black and hispanic student unions who have the same mission racist as well or you are a big hypocrite.
 
The difference is that being white already gives you better interactions and opportunities in dozens of small ways, most of which you don't even notice, while being black/gay has the opposite effect. That's why white rights don't needs groups to defend them; the culture is already doing that.

I agree with what you typed. However, what about a white guy fighting against reverse discrimination? My dad, for example, in the late 80's was an auto dealer GM. He was demoted because the state enacted a certain % of blacks must have key positions. My dad, being far more qualified (seriously) was demoted but asked to continue doing his same job description. He fought it. My dad was no racist.
 
what about a white guy fighting against reverse discrimination? My dad, for example, in the late 80's was an auto dealer GM. He was demoted because the state enacted a certain % of blacks must have key positions. My dad, being far more qualified (seriously) was demoted but asked to continue doing his same job description. He fought it. My dad was no racist.

No such thing as "reverse" racism unless you assume racism originated from European Americans.
 
I have no business responding here as I haven't read the thread, at all.

I am curious, though, why if a group of blacks are defending their rights it's nothing. Whites defending their rights is racist?
Are the gays advocating for equal rights bigots against heteros?

Sorry, I'm probably way off base here. If so, just ignore me. No malice intended.

Basically the answer I am gettign is that if you or your ancestors were oppressed than you can have race based groups that are not racist. If you do not then no you cannot not.

Good to know that racism is a white man only disease.
 
u know what I mean..

I know what you mean but this idea of reverse racism or reverse discrimination is idiocy. Racism and discrimination are racism and discrimination regardless of victim and/or perpetrator.
 
If you consider this group racist for that mission, you also have to consider the black and hispanic student unions who have the same mission racist as well or you are a big hypocrite.

Creating a group for the advancement of white people is actively discriminatory and racist. If you are creating a group to "celebrate white culture" then you are just an idiot because that isn't a thing.
 
Creating a group for the advancement of white people is actively discriminatory and racist. If you are creating a group to "celebrate white culture" then you are just an idiot because that isn't a thing.

You may not like it and may hold it against me but that's fine. But that is complete ********. It is racist I they attack others that are not white.

Any group can push for the advancement of their own race and that is fine. As it should be. Wanting to help in the advancement of your race does not mean you have it out for others.
 
With that I think we have pretty much run this thread into the ground.
 
What's the point of this group?

I sincerely doubt their motives are to "celebrate" white culture. I could be wrong, but at best these guys were merely looking for attention. At worst, they're racist thugs.

Are they hoping to pass legislation for... Something?

I just don't see their motives being exactly noble. But that's just my opinion.



Certainly qualities unique to "white culture...." Cuz... No other race or culture supports or exhibits community service, better education, and family values....

Dumb-and-Dumber-jim-carrey-141693_260_397.jpg

I'm guessing they are the kind of people who get butt hurt over black history month for no reason.
 
Celebrating "white culture" reminds me of an Aziz Ansari bit were he says a stranger came up to him and congratulated his race for making "Slumdog Millionaire" and he questions whether white people congratulate themselves for every movie a white person has made/been in. I would post, but I'm sure it's laced with obscenities and I don't want to get banned again.
 
You may not like it and may hold it against me but that's fine. But that is complete ********. It is racist I they attack others that are not white.

Any group can push for the advancement of their own race and that is fine. As it should be. Wanting to help in the advancement of your race does not mean you have it out for others.

It's America and they are well within their rights to do that. It's just racist as hell though.

Race is not actually a thing. It is a societal construct. These groups are formed in order to better the conditions of minorities who have been discriminated against by those in power (generally speaking, white people). So essentially a group created to advance the people already in power based on the color of their skin is inherently racist as ****.
 
I agree with what you typed. However, what about a white guy fighting against reverse discrimination? My dad, for example, in the late 80's was an auto dealer GM. He was demoted because the state enacted a certain % of blacks must have key positions. My dad, being far more qualified (seriously) was demoted but asked to continue doing his same job description. He fought it. My dad was no racist.

On the subject of affirmative action, it's a practice put in place to counteract the inherent advantage of being a white person. Advancing in the workforce and receiving higher education is still extremely difficult for minorities. It is an IMPERFECT system of course, but it is what it is.
 
The difference is that being white already gives you better interactions and opportunities in dozens of small ways, most of which you don't even notice, while being black/gay has the opposite effect. That's why white rights don't needs groups to defend them; the culture is already doing that.

Saying whites and heterosexuals have better interactions than blacks and homosexuals is racist and homophobic.

The rest is nonsense once you systemically enact quotas for other races and exclude whites. That's "the culture" being racist against whites. PKM's is just one example. The discrimination against white firefighters in Connecticut is another example. The way the Duke lacrosse players were treated in "the culture" is another example. When the media portrayed Zimmerman as white, and then switched to "white-hispanic" (<---first time that term has ever been used by the media) is another example of how "the culture" only tolerates racism against whites. Not to mention King Shabazz and his baton wielding friend. "The culture" is constantly spitting on Martin Luther King Jr.'s Dream in a way he never imagined.

If it is racist to have a white student union then it is racist to have a black or hispanic student union.
 
Saying whites and heterosexuals have better interactions than blacks and homosexuals is racist and homophobic.

The rest is nonsense once you systemically enact quotas for other races and exclude whites. That's "the culture" being racist against whites. PKM's is just one example. The discrimination against white firefighters in Connecticut is another example. The way the Duke lacrosse players were treated in "the culture" is another example. When the media portrayed Zimmerman as white, and then switched to "white-hispanic" (<---first time that term has ever been used by the media) is another example of how "the culture" only tolerates racism against whites. Not to mention King Shabazz and his baton wielding friend. "The culture" is constantly spitting on Martin Luther King Jr.'s Dream in a way he never imagined.

If it is racist to have a white student union then it is racist to have a black or hispanic student union.

Will you just admit that you have no grasp of the definition of racism?
 
Back
Top