That doesn't answer the question. 3-15 FG and 1-4 FT doesn't fix "crap at the 2."
No real incentive for the Clippers to trade for a 15 mil backup player (he wouldn't start over Griffin or Jordan).
He's a young prospect with a lot of talent, who isn't seeing the court. Bledsoe is not going to extend. If I'm the Clips giving myself 2 years to make something out of a lottery pick is better than losing Eric for nothing.
He's a young prospect with a lot of talent, who isn't seeing the court. Bledsoe is not going to extend. If I'm the Clips giving myself 2 years to make something out of a lottery pick is better than losing Eric for nothing.
{Trade rookie contract not playing for rookie contract playing}
Clippers are looking to win NOW. If they don't think they'll extend Bledsoe (and you DO realize he has another year on his rookie deal, right?), they'll either wait 'til next year to trade him or trade him this year for something that can actually help them THIS year. Burks is the LAST type of asset they'd trade Bledsoe for, assuming they'd even want to.
Hm, I was sure Eric was a FA. Hasn't everybody been talking about simply signing him? As far as the rest, I disagree. LAC absolutely have room to bring up a young player. Keep in mind this is a team who likes Crawford's game.
Not sure how legit this rumor is the Jazz never leak info. If true, would be a nail in the coffin for this organization as far as I'm concerned.
What about Kendall Marshall for Alec Burks straight up?
Phoenix needs a young SG, and they have two young PG's.
I'd vote yes, in a second.. but I'm not quite the homer as most.
I'm still on the bandwagon infect I'm thinking of running for president.
You mean the Burks bandwagon?