What's new

Pick a trading partner!

The LAC deal is dope. The other great idea was floated by Franklin, who suggested we deal Al to Philly for Bynum (the deal is more complex than this), who we help s&t to a team of his choosing this offseason. Maybe to ATL for a recently re-upped Teague. Maybe to Brooklyn for Lopez. (these examples are mine.)

Hell yes! We could get Marshon Brooks in that deal as another project. Then stockpile picks with this: https://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=aleylc4

How does everyone feel about this team:

Orlando #10, Jazz #9, GSW #23
Hayward, Burks, Marshon
Marvin, Hayward
Kanter, Favors, Hedo (or released)
Favors, Lopez

$56.5mm in payroll + draft pick prices, and $19.5mm expiring in Hedo and Marvin.

3 draft picks and Lopez could damn well haul in Rajon Rondo.
 
I dont really care at this point. I just want to see any kind of effort by management to get something for Al or Paul. Something is better than nothing. Which is where we are headed if we dont move one of those guys, because re-signing both would be dumb as ****.


Ill play.

Jefferson for

T jones and other stuff.
 
I dont really care at this point. I just want to see any kind of effort by management to get something for Al or Paul. Something is better than nothing. Which is where we are headed if we dont move one of those guys, because re-signing both would be dumb as ****.


Ill play.

Jefferson for

T jones and other stuff.

Thanks for playing Hack.
 
BTW, Nerd, I'm surprised that you even attempted something with Beasley when you have no interest in anything from Sacramento. Both teams are similar to me in the fact that they have a bunch of pieces that don't seem to work for their respective teams. And they both have a so called locker room cancer that might be dealt.

yeah, but that's the cost of dealing with the suns right now. their #1 priority is dumping beas. in my scenario above, the idea would be to buy him out since we have no use for him. but yeah, there's a reason that scenario was my last choice.

in the toronto scenario, our depth chart would look like this:

calderon / tinsley / watson
foye / hayward / burks
marv / carroll / murph
sap / (favors) / evans
favors / kanter

a little light up front - i'd prefer something that also nets us a 4th big to play 15-20 minutes, but no big deal. then, when mo gets back from injury, calderon can start but we'd see them play some minutes together with mo coming off the ball in a JET type of role.

or...

vazquez / tinsley
foye / hayward / murph
marv / delfino / carroll
sap / jones / evans
fav / kanter / lopez

vazquez is even better suited to join mo in the backcourt because he's 6'6" so he can legimimately check some SGs so it's not a liability on the other end. this roster would be fantastic. we could look to move lopez in a separate deal, buy him out, or play him as the fourth big for a while and let jones learn some stuff.

i really like either of those deals, to be honest.
 
lock RT'd something about gay being supposedly available, too... but they have no need for al/paul, so it would have to be a 3-teamer.
 
I think that you missed the point.

I thought you said pick a team (L.A.) pick a trade (millsap for bledsoe and pick) must include millsap or jeffy.

What did i do wrong?
 
I thought you said pick a team (L.A.) pick a trade (millsap for bledsoe and pick) must include millsap or jeffy.

What did i do wrong?

Nevermind, i didnt know i had pick from the teams you mentioned..... i dont want to play now.
 
Maybe, it's a trick question and he wanted u to pick big al , pick for lowery barngani. I think he hates big al and has a fetish with an undersized Millsap?
 
Back
Top