What's new

Enes Kanter's Last 10 Games

This.

And this.

I may be a homer. But I'm a realistic homer. Enes needs to improve his ability to read the game, the opposition and his matchup and act with his reflexes, instincts. Otherwise, his improvement will be limited. He always hustles, he kicked *** in the Kings game, but hustle isn't everything when it comes to basketball.

And this.

It's all about your talent evaluating (in)abilities. Harden is obviously talented and capable of being a star on his own, yet most the posters here wouldn't have traded Favors for him straight up. Absurd. Just as absurd a notion as Kanter's efficiency will increase with playing time or that Burks has much raw talent.

Kanter will get better in practice and then will show his skills on the court. And then he'll get the starting nod after becoming more efficient.
 
Franklin is right, we have to give AL 40 minutes a game, 10 minutes are enough for Kanter. Kanter has to stop stealing minutes from AL. If we want to go to play-offs we need to give AL more touches on O, like 20 shots per Game.
 
And this.

It's all about your talent evaluating (in)abilities. Harden is obviously talented and capable of being a star on his own, yet most the posters here wouldn't have traded Favors for him straight up. Absurd. Just as absurd a notion as Kanter's efficiency will increase with playing time or that Burks has much raw talent.

Kanter will get better in practice and then will show his skills on the court. And then he'll get the starting nod after becoming more efficient.

Kanter will eventually start at some point of his career, whether in SLC or somewhere else. But practice is not his thing. He needs to play and grow a sense of self-confidence so that he can stop thinking hard on avoiding a mistake, or stop worrying too much after making one.

Burks is a natural. He may be the next Wade if prepared well, works with the right coaches etc.

And about that Harden boy, watch him, Aşık and Lin. They will be a force in the west for a long time.
 
You post this nice 10 game stat. Your first post was great. And your neg was correct, it's wrong for me to talk about nazis regardless of how pissed I get about a post.

Then, compare to AJ and it goes to the lynch mob. FU 2 GVC. I don't care who your parents were, who your friend are, who you are. You were and are absolutely being absurdly biased with your stats.

You know what, why didn't you post the last (previous)10 games of Kanter? Why didn't you post another set of stats of another player ( i dunno, maybe Favors) in a similar situation? F NO, it hast to be about Jefferson.

You are a respected poster on this site. I expect people like you to be intellectually honest. It's absolutely ridiculous to compare per 36 to a guy that is actually playing close to 36. You know that.

I'll give you a straight up wager. Ty Corbin will never be fired. If he is fired I'll never post on this site again. If he wins to the conference championship I expect a well written apology.

Will you take?
1. How was I being biased? I posted raw data. Maybe you've missed the responses to your post. There are plenty of reasonable conclusions to be drawn.

2. The most anger/hatred my post generated was from you. I see no lynch mob in this thread. You are the screaming idiot.

3. I explained why I posted those 10 games. They were the games in which Kanter's minutes were cut. The first of those 10 was the first game he got less than 10 minutes this season. Reading is fundamental.

4. Why didn't I post Favors' stats? Because he's not the guy getting 34 minutes per night, producing inefficiently, Al is. If one takes Loony's argument to its' logical conclusion, you'd have to say that if more minutes/responsibility = less efficiency, then less minutes/responsibility = more efficiency. With that in mind, at the margin one would expect the Jazz to get better efficiency/production from the 5 by giving some of Al's minutes to Kanter. Is that simple enough for you to understand, or do I have to dumb it down some more to avoid another juvenile temper tantrum from you?

5. Corbin? Straw man much? You obviously have me confused with someone else. Pull your head out of your ***.
 
Millsap was more efficient offensively backing up Boozer in his final year, then when he took the starting reigns from Booz

Not true. Millsap's PER in the post Boozer years is better than the pre-Boozer years. Feel free to look it up like I did.

Just kidding, definitely no chance a player improves with opportunity.
 
Not true. Millsap's PER in the post Boozer years is better than the pre-Boozer years. Feel free to look it up like I did.

Just kidding, definitely no chance a player improves with opportunity.

Another player that seems to be improving with opportunity..... Sanders for the bucks.
 
Back
Top