I'm not sure what "the latter Fes camp" is, but I want the Jazz to sign Fesenko. But I'm sorry I might not be clear enough because my opinion is measured.
And I'm fully aware Gortat costs more, I didn't say anything about how much he cost. And I'm aware he's under contract. I'm also aware that Orlando has the premier C in the league right now, and are paying somewhere between $6 million and $12 million a year (after penalties) for a backup that brings nothing Howard doesn't and wants out.
The difference between Gortat and Fes is vast even if it's not clear on the surface. Fes is a goofball that might never be able to figure it out and whose official measurements are not available. Gortat has been a rotation player on a true contender that PRODUCES when he's on the court in addition to all of the little things Fesenko does for court space (Fesenko isn't much for production). While anyone (except maybe you) would agree with that assessment, it's known exactly what Gortat's physical profile, and it's very impressive. And Gortat is a professional.
No, Gortat isn't Howard. He's not a scorer. He's not a star. But he's a 7-footer that defends, rebounds, and isn't an idiot. There's no one on the Jazz or in the mix currently that you can say that about.
But that's all kind of beside the point that I don't think the Millers want to pay the price-tag for Gortat even if he was acquirable as a straight-up salary dump. It's just wishful thinking.
Sorry; I feared that “the latter Fes camp” wouldn’t be clear. The “camp” that I was referring to your comment that Fes did make a “significant difference” most of the time that he was on the court. Maybe you're not too far from the mark after all

.
I guess by going out for Gortat, you mean trade for him (unless he was somehow waived). I don’t see a Jazz combination of players where it would make sense to trade for Gortat. My point is that suggesting Gortat (or any other signed player without a trade in mind) is wishful thinking
at best. Gortat is far more expensive than a third-string center would command (or maybe even a second-stringer, especially in luxury tax territory).
While I’ve been intrigued by Gortat in the past also, is he really all that, anyway?
https://www.orlandopinstripedpost.com/2010/6/3/1497301/evaluating-marcin-gortat
Assuming salary as a linear metric (not really accurate, but the point still holds), I don’t think that Gortat is 2 or 3 times better than Fesenko—much less the QO that Utah is probably offering the latter camp (Fes’s).
He’s had some nice games (e.g., vs. the depleted Spurs), but he’s not a big scorer.
https://www.cbssports.com/nba/players/playerpage/555948/marcin-gortat
And evidently he got dazzled by Zaza overseas (although he made it up with a good game vs. the pesky Portugueses << rolleyes >>).
https://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/s...-redeemed-from-zaza-pachulia-destruction.html
The NBA stats show Gortat as a more prolific rebounder and a mildly better shotblocker than Fesenko and Koufos (!), but he scored at a slightly lower rate than both of them during last season and the season before. (And I won’t bring up his so-so +/-, either.) To me, that doesn’t command several million more per year—or, salary aside, even a coveting that is much more than what Fes brings. So I don't know what you're talking about with what Gortat "PRODUCES."
If your criteria includes “idiot” as you stated above, then maybe Karl Malone should’ve played less, too. And Boozer and "Torrey Ellis," depending on your definition of idiocy.
https://www.themightymjd.com/2005/12/15/deron-williams-robert-whaley-give-fake-names-to-cops/
My criteria focus on what they do
on the court, and it presumes that they have a reasonably minimal opportunity to do something on the court. Fes isn't running for Congress or trying to get a medical license; barring criminal activity, what players do off the court should not be direct factors on whether they play (although it likely will indirectly affect their play, which is why the on-court performance is the best criteria, because off-court performance will be reflected).