![]()
Fredom, libertee, i hate muslem sosialists!
Wow, that's a sweet little Crossman 10-pump pellet gun. Pretty intimidating. "Stay back or I'll have to...one, two, three, four,...shoot...five, six, seven,...you...eight, nine, ten. So watch out!"
![]()
Fredom, libertee, i hate muslem sosialists!
I'm still having an impossibly hard time believing that you both UNDERSTAND what each of these guys is doing and STILL GENUINELY LIKE all three. I know you claim to not be too familiar with them, but please tell me how this is possible.
For me to actually care about Stewart's/Colbert's political views you would have to convince me that those guys were even the least bit powerful. I don't take those guys seriously as political commentators, but I enjoy their humor. Beck's a giant, those guys together can't sniff his jock.
The article is very specific that the Parks Service no longer provides estimates after the Million Man March. If he claimed to have an estimate from them he's either lying or it's an unofficial estimate from an individual who works for the Parks Service.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Million_Man_March#Crowd_size_controversy
As far as I can tell the sole exception was that Dan Bana offered an estimate of 1.8 million for the Obama inauguration. It's unclear if that was an official estimate or not.
This article, https://www.aolnews.com/surge-desk/...te-crowd-size-glenn-becks-or-otherwi/19613962 , indicates one Parks official (unnamed) gave an unoffical estimate of 300,000. It makes no mention of aerial photographs being used in the process and points out that's the exact number listed on the permit request by Beck (so he may merely have been stating the expected number as his unofficial estimate).
Do you have any evidence that Beck paid for his own set of aerial photos and had those photos estimated? Or any evidence that AirPhotosLive made an erroneous estimate of the Obama inauguration? Or are you just pulling arguments from your ***?
This is pure conjecture on your part, and I think it is debatable; sheer magnitude of distracting energy (a la Beck) does not equal power. But, whether or not this is true, it should be noted that Beck is dedicating his life and his message to being A GIANT (as you say), whereas Stewart-Colbert are very self-aware in their role as comedians.
Also of note: if you take Stewart-Colbert as lightly as you do, I'm going to go out on a limb and say you are not giving them their due. They are more powerful than you think.
I can't find the information right now, but at one point Colbert was almost literally controlling the buzzwords of the news cycle. He used an identifiable phrase similar to "angry populist mob" in a show's skit (in connection with Obama's campaigning), and that phrase went on to become the catch phrase of the news cycle, with more word matches than any other descriptor over the course of 2-3 weeks. There is an article somewhere that explains this better. No time to find it.
Lastly, how are you measuring Beck's power? What results are you citing?
Hey Duckman, see above.
I saw it, just nothing to add really. I think the topic speaks for itself. If Beck wasn't powerful, why the constant media hubbub...why the mock rallies? I really don't think any other media personality could have put together a rally like Beck's, but yes, that surely is just my own thoughts. Maybe when somebody else in a similar position has the stones to try and hold a serious rally, we can make the comparison. But I'm under the impression that what just happened was pretty unique.
Beck isn't powerful, he's annoying as hell.
I'm sure you were saying the same thing about the Tea Party on 4/15/09 and look where we are at now. If things are happening in front of your face, you probably should acknowledge them. You don't have to like them, but just project a little. It's not a bad thing to take current events and speculate on future trends like some in the media make you think.
Your view that he's powerful says a lot.
haha, you are right.
I also love how Franklin, Marcus, and Mullethack have avoided this thread.
Lawyer boy, isn't your whole job purely reading? I never said any of the things you expounded on.
that's why Beck went out of his way to make sure he had photographs from his rally last month from all angles this time around so that when ABC news comes out and says only 80,000 were there, like they did, you know not to take them seriously on any estimates in the future because it's not even in the ballpark.
Like I said, Beck paid for his own set of photos. He then got the estimates from the land authority( or whoever the hell is in charge of the National Mall).
1) I said that they gave him an estimate of specific areas of what the Mall can hold generally and his people did the math. That's what we call capacity. Not that they gave him an estimate for the entire event.
Source: The Glenn Beck Show either August 30th or 31st. Look it up in the archives if you care so much.
2) I never said that Jeff's Airplane Estimates had anything do with the Obama's crowd estimates either. I simply stated that if you look at photos from both events, that either the extreme of Obama's estimates(1.8 million) or Beck's has to be off logically if you are going to buy into the 80,000 number. Obama didn't have 22 times the number of people than Beck's rally and that is clearly evident to any average joe that looks at the same photos of the Mall area. It was significantly bigger, but probably more in the range of 3-6 times. And since I tend to believe that the Obama numbers were indeed in the mid one millions based on several human traffic statistics, it's a reasonable assumption that Beck had significantly more than 80,000.
This thread has morphed into a huge plate of crow... served especially to Duck Rogers.
A.....no. The whole thing was a ****ing joke, just like I said it would be.
I know, lil' dude, it is a tough pill to swallow.... but when Stew has an exclusive interview with the president and a massively attended rally in DC in the same week (which, btw, is said to have bigger than Beck's), then you can't go around blabbing about how Stew is inconsequential to your bully-boy Beck. Sorry.
And so the resulting outcome is that the Dems are going to swallow seats on Nov. 2 now? Get the **** outta here. It was a bunch of under 30 liberal drones from the "prestigious" universities out East that wanted to party a little that attended that event. I don't know if I've ever mentioned it, but I'm not impressed by those guys. I eat their lunch every day in the markets.
Watch this, then comment if you like.
https://www.comedycentral.com/video...=363864&title=jon-stewart-moment-of-sincerity
And so the resulting outcome is that the Dems are going to swallow seats on Nov. 2 now? Get the **** outta here. It was a bunch of under 30 liberal drones from the "prestigious" universities out East that wanted to party a little that attended that event. I don't know if I've ever mentioned it, but I'm not impressed by those guys. I eat their lunch every day in the markets.