Stifle Tower
Punch Bowl Re-Filler
Looks like just the 3 of us in here right now. I'll step out and read the game thread so the two of you can spend some quality time together.
Money
I'd have to opine it goes deeper than that. . . . into "education" as some accept it to be. . . . conditioning of a sociologicial / pathological kind, like Pavlov's dogs for example. . . . to just bend over for the Bigs.
Speaking of fast talkers, my wife used to watch the Gilmore Girls when that was on. That series gave me a headache just trying to keep up with the conversations. It was like listening to an auctioneer for 1/2 hour.
I'd have to opine it goes deeper than that. . . . into "education" as some accept it to be. . . . conditioning of a sociologicial / pathological kind, like Pavlov's dogs for example. . . . to just bend over for the Bigs.
We'd have to agree to disagree, generally. I think these folks get taught that spreading the wealth is far better to lining their pockets... and as archaic as it is.. it's effective.
Speaking of fast talkers, my wife used to watch the Gilmore Girls when that was on. That series gave me a headache just trying to keep up with the conversations. It was like listening to an auctioneer for 1/2 hour.
We'd have to agree to disagree, generally. I think these folks get taught that spreading the wealth is far better to lining their pockets... and as archaic as it is.. it's effective.
nah. I go at things different. I disagree about the necessity of agreeing on anything. I want to hear someone else's idea, and maybe I'll even tell someone my own.
Looks like just the 3 of us in here right now. I'll step out and read the game thread so the two of you can spend some quality time together.
nah. I go at things different. I disagree about the necessity of agreeing on anything. I want to hear someone else's idea, and maybe I'll even tell someone my own.
Cool.. so I think Hollywood doesn't generally think that deeply. It's siiiimple.. spread the wealth.. more people can buy tickets.
We'd have to agree to disagree, generally. I think these folks get taught that spreading the wealth is far better to lining their pockets... and as archaic as it is.. it's effective.
OK, so "these folks" are not yet homogenized, well. . .. . speaking in terms of still having some unique personal attributes. . .. the ones you know might not be the ones I know. Look, when I meet folks I don't just do some kind of personal take-down. I do triage sociologically and just try to find some way to learn something from them, and wait until they ask, and then carefully consider their set points and tolerances, before speaking. . . . not at all like in here where I'm just the rowdy who's having fun.
some "folks" are altruistic and do intend to use their means to some imagined good end. . . . others are in fact quite the opposite, and set up 'charities' for oblique agendas aimed at putting the world in their pockets. . . . lined or not.
Cool.. so I think Hollywood doesn't generally think that deeply. It's siiiimple.. spread the wealth.. more people can buy tickets.
maybe.
but the wealth they want to spread might not be theirs. . . . say maybe. . . . the government's in their view. . .. so more people can buy tickets.
Thanks to some rapid-fire posts in this thread and Buckner, it looks like I'll stay ahead of Dutch for at least another week.
Thanks to some rapid-fire posts in this thread and Buckner, it looks like I'll stay ahead of Dutch for at least another week.
horses. well, not just horsecrap, but real horses.
The anti-Mos have had it for a couple of centuries, with all the hoopla about how the Spanish lost some horses around Santa Fe or SoCal, and how there were no horses in the New World when the Europeans came here. The Book of Mormon allegedly says something about horses. The Mahonri Moriancumr subs didn't have horses, no? Lehi didn't have horses, no? But they said something, about once, in supposedly a thousand years of history about horses, no? Not one cowboy in the whole Book. The bones of little equines about two feet high are acknowledged in pre-historic American finds. Is that what got translated as "horses" ????
There is a cave I know about, on the shorelines of Lake Bonneville on the west side of Utah. . . . Gandy Mountain. . . . where the BLM hired some locals to re-open a caved-in front, where there was a huge overhang/entrance. The back side had a small worm hole that was only discovered about fifty years ago. The BLM workers found horse fossils, dated at 10,000 years old, of full-sized horses.
Horses are mentioned eleven times in the Book of Mormon in the context of its New World setting.[31] There is no evidence that horses existed on the American continent during the 2500-3000 year history of the Book of Mormon (2500 BC - 400 AD) The only evidence of horses on the American continent dates to pre-historic times,[32] (between 12,500 and 10,000 BC.[33]). It is widely accepted that horses were extinct in the Western Hemisphere over 10,000 years ago and did not reappear there until the Spaniards brought them from Europe.[34] Horses were re-introduced to the Americas (Caribbean) by Christopher Columbus in 1493[35] and to the American continent by Cortés in 1519.[36][37]
See also: Quaternary extinction event
Mormon apologists argue the following to deal with this supposed anachronism:
Mormon apologist John L. Sorenson at FARMS claims that there is fossil evidence that some New World horses may have survived the Pleistocene–Holocene transition,[38] though these findings are disputed by mainstream archaeologists.[39]
Mormon apologist Robert R. Bennett suggests that the word "horse" in the Book of Mormon may have referred to a different animal, such as a tapir.[40]