Syracuse is a tough team with length and swarming defense. I could definitely see them making the Final Four.
Their defense gives them a shot every year.. it keeps them in every game.
Syracuse is a tough team with length and swarming defense. I could definitely see them making the Final Four.
And Yogi is a good PG..
Carter-Williams played off the ball quite a bit though. He only had 1 assist in the box score. There were a couple of others where his teammates just didn't make shots, but he wasn't really running the offense.
If MCW had a good tournament, and kept playing like this, I wouldn't be surprised if KOC/Lindsey decided to go with MCW.
It's well documented that KOC loves "players who are long for their position". Burke for all of his attributes, goes against that philosophy.
Why don't we have Paul George then?![]()
I'd like to see the Jazz play that style.
I about choked on a pretzel. Wtf would you want to watch sloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwww ball?
Their defense gives them a shot every year.. it keeps them in every game.
I about choked on a pretzel. Wtf would you want to watch sloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwww ball?
Zone D is a big preparation advantage. Most college teams run upwards of 50 different plays against man, meaning a great amount of film study and practice is devoted to what the other team wants to do. But a zone flips the script, shifting the prep work onto opposing shoulders. Because defenders guard an area instead of a man, offenses can utilize only about two or three different wrinkles against a 2-3. And, Pitino says, "in all my years, I haven't seen one zone offense that's as good as a man offense." So while an opposing coach scrambles both to prepare his man-to-man D for multiple offensive sets and get his offense ready for an unfamiliar defensive look, a zone coach can turn his attention inward toward execution and player development.
Nowhere is that advantage more critical than in postseason play, with short turnaround time between games. Syracuse's six-overtime win against UConn in last year's Big East tourney was unforgettable. But do you recall that the next day the Orange knocked off West Virginia in OT, too? You'd think that after playing into the wee hours of the morning, the Orange would have been toast, from a preparation perspective. Thanks to their zone, that wasn't an issue.
do you usually have pretzel for dinner??
Just out of interest..
Zone has its advantages though - here's from Jay Bilas re Zones:
In a big tournament like this where you play up to 3 teams a week, it's much easier to prepare for. Then you can focus on your offense, etc.
I scouted four games (vs Georgia Tech, Wake Forest, Duke, NC St.) of Shane Larkin to get a better idea of how he scores the ball. The stats show he has a very well rounded scoring game. Here is where his offense comes from:
Spot up 3-pointers: ~29% of total points scored
Free throws: ~17% of total points scored
Low post up moves: ~13% of total points scored
Fast break opportunities: ~13% of total points scored
High post moves: ~11% of total points scored
Mid range spot up jumpers: ~6% of total points scored
Drives: ~4% of total points scored
Offensive put-back's: ~4%
Alley-oop dunks: ~2% of total points scored
Larkin seems to be a really underrated 3-point shooter. It's where he gets the majority of his points from, and in these games he shot 64% (9/14) on spot up 3's. On the season he's shooting 42% on 3.5 attempts per game from 3.
Another area that really stood out was his ability to score out of the high post. 11% of his offense came here, but the more impressive thing was that he shot 71% from the high post (post moves outside of 10 feet is how I measured it). It's a small sample size, but I do believe he has an elite post game for a perimeter player his age.
He aslo scores out of the low post, and gets to the FT line at a great rate like any good scorer should.
The main thing missing from his scoring arsenal is his ability to take his man off the dribble. But, he's better at it than the 4% would suggest, cause sometimes he would drive, then be met by another defender and end up shooting a jump hook out of the low/high post, so I counted the points in those categories.
He scores all over the court, both within the flow of the offense (coming of screens for spot up jumpers etc.) and by creating his own shot. If he ever improves his handle the way he improved his 3-pointer (that was one of the nocks on his game coming out out of high school), then watch out.
Curious. Do you ever get repped from these posts? Lolz
Corbin <<<< X