What's new

Following potential 2013 draftees

Probably kindergarten?

18 months would be 1.5 years, and you would round up to two.

16 months would be 1.33, so you round down to 1.

*Couldn't tell if you were disagreeing with me, or being sarcastic*

Hmm. I guess I biffed that one. I thought you were saying to round up to two.
 
Kabongo: 01/12/1992
Schroeder: 09/15/1993

By my calculation, that's 12 + 8 = 20 months? Where do you get your 16 months from?

Damn, I did have a brain fart right there. For some reason I counted from September to January (4 months), instead of January to September (8 months).






MY BAD GUYS.
 
Maybe he is better than Bongo.

A PG who is very 1 hand dominated kind of worries me though.

Yeah, we'll have to see how "one handed" he actually he. It's just a comment Fran Fraschilla made in 1 of the moves, where he basically puts on another gear and blew by the opposing PG for a layup. The comment was something along the line of "I guess one knock on this kid is he likes to use his right hand - but with that kind of speed you might not need your left hand!!"
 
Maybe he is better than Bongo.

A PG who is very 1 hand dominated kind of worries me though.

If you watch his highlights he uses his left hand deliver quite a bit. I posted the tweet about being right hand dominate but I think that is deceiving based on what I have been seeing from him.
 
Yeah, we'll have to see how "one handed" he actually he. It's just a comment Fran Fraschilla made in 1 of the moves, where he basically puts on another gear and blew by the opposing PG for a layup. The comment was something along the line of "I guess one knock on this kid is he likes to use his right hand - but with that kind of speed you might not need your left hand!!"

Go watch his highlights again. I was worried about it until I watched those again.

Great work on the research for shooting numbers and age.
 
These last couple pages illustrate what I like about Cy. He's not afraid to admit when/if he's wrong. Take notes youngsters.
 
Also if you like Trey Burke (who can go both to his left and to his right) - one knock on him is he seems to have a very slow change of speed. It's painful at times watching him trying to shake a defender to get to where he wants to go, to penetrate, or to get a shot off.

Schroeder doesn't have that problem whatsoever. He's built like a Golf GTI, his gear change is lightning quick.

You can teach ball handling, dribbling, but as far as I know, you can't teach speed.
 
Well the thing is though, he Schroeder went head to head against Kasey Hill who some of us had a hard-on over (including me and AlexBurks_PGgods, amongst others). Schroeder is slightly older, but he completely outplayed Hill in this game IMO. Physically Schroeder had a bigger frame, was better defensively, controls the game better and was just more mature out there on the court. They both had pretty similar speed & quickness though it seems. But Hill was quite a bit smaller... I would say Schroeder held his own against Andrew Harrison as well.

Now, Hill is a projected lotto pick next year if I'm not mistaken in a loaded draft? So if we can get Schroeder at #14 in this much weaker draft I think it would be a bargain. Granted, we're taking on a bit of a project, but early signs are there that he could be a legit talent.

Good points, but like you said, he's older, and playing against other pro's... He should be much better. In my mind it doesn't mean he will be a better pro. Next years draft is loaded, and if you believe like I do in thinking we will get a mid to late lotto pick we will get a very good pg.

Why not get a good backup pg in this draft in Wolters and Canaan, along with a third big in Adams, and a project in Austin or the GF, and shoot for the fences next year and get our pg of the future, and if we just miss out on the playoffs again like this year, we can at the very least get Smart.
 
Good points, but like you said, he's older, and playing against other pro's... He should be much better. In my mind it doesn't mean he will be a better pro. Next years draft is loaded, and if you believe like I do in thinking we will get a mid to late lotto pick we will get a very good pg.

Why not get a good backup pg in this draft in Wolters and Canaan, along with a third big in Adams, and a project in Austin or the GF, and shoot for the fences next year and get our pg of the future, and if we just miss out on the playoffs again like this year, we can at the very least get Smart.

I actually think that Schroe is better than any of the other PG's next year not named Harrison.
 
Good points, but like you said, he's older, and playing against other pro's... He should be much better. In my mind it doesn't mean he will be a better pro. Next years draft is loaded, and if you believe like I do in thinking we will get a mid to late lotto pick we will get a very good pg.

Why not get a good backup pg in this draft in Wolters and Canaan, along with a third big in Adams, and a project in Austin or the GF, and shoot for the fences next year and get our pg of the future, and if we just miss out on the playoffs again like this year, we can at the very least get Smart.

To be honest with you, I'd take Schroeder over Smart right now. I'd rather have my PG be really quick and fast, pushing the tempo, finding guys - than someone who posts up smaller PG on the block (we already have Favors & Kanter doing that). Also Schroeder is already a better 3pt shooter than Smart and he is a good defender, he moves his feet and he sticks to you.

In terms of intangibles, yeah Smart is right up there. But don't forget, Schroeder had 1 week to get these International guys playing together - and he did that. He just seems like a natural leader out there on the floor.
 
To be honest with you, I'd take Schroeder over Smart right now. I'd rather have my PG be really quick and fast, pushing the tempo, finding guys - than someone who posts up smaller PG on the block (we already have Favors & Kanter doing that). Also Schroeder is already a better 3pt shooter than Smart and he is a good defender, he moves his feet and he sticks to you.

In terms of intangibles, yeah Smart is right up there. But don't forget, Schroeder had 1 week to get these International guys playing together - and he did that. He just seems like a natural leader out there on the floor.

I from what I have seen from both I would always take Schroe over Smart.
 
I like what I've seen from Schroeder, but come on... Better than smart????. Maybe one day, but no one would be selecting him over smart and if you don't believe me then lets stop talking about him now because he is out of our reach.
 
Back
Top