What's new

Following potential 2013 draftees

I would find it extremely satisfying if Schroeder went on pick #15 right after our pick.

satisfying because?

You do know about half this board is calling for us to pick a PG in this draft right? As unless you've been hiding under a rock somewhere, McCollum is going top #10 - meaning we've got no chance at getting him.

You can feed on hate, but in the end it'll eat you up.
 
satisfying because?

You do know about half this board is calling for us to pick a PG in this draft right? As unless you've been hiding under a rock somewhere, McCollum is going top #10 - meaning we've got no chance at getting him.

You can feed on hate, but in the end it'll eat you up.

So?
 
satisfying because?

You do know about half this board is calling for us to pick a PG in this draft right? As unless you've been hiding under a rock somewhere, McCollum is going top #10 - meaning we've got no chance at getting him.

You can feed on hate, but in the end it'll eat you up.

I hope you realize you're one of the major reasons this site has gone to ****. Do us all a favor and quit posting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BHP
satisfying because?

You do know about half this board is calling for us to pick a PG in this draft right? As unless you've been hiding under a rock somewhere, McCollum is going top #10 - meaning we've got no chance at getting him.

You can feed on hate, but in the end it'll eat you up.

It's not hate it's called being a realist. You don't draft a position just because it's a need unless that is BPA. No way in hell is there going to be a pg available to take at 14. That's a clippers move.
 
satisfying because?

You do know about half this board is calling for us to pick a PG in this draft right? As unless you've been hiding under a rock somewhere, McCollum is going top #10 - meaning we've got no chance at getting him.

You can feed on hate, but in the end it'll eat you up.

Seems to me like a lot of people are calling for bpa. That is what I would want. If it is a poi t guard, that would be ok. But I don't think you should miss out on a better player just because the team needs a point guard. That's how you end up with Raul Lopez and Carlos arroyo.
 
I hope you realize you're one of the major reasons this site has gone to ****. Do us all a favor and quit posting.

?? So you agree with Thee Jazz Fanz that "I would find it extremely satisfying if Schroeder went on pick #15 right after our pick" ??

Who would you rather take at #14, may I ask??
 
Seems to me like a lot of people are calling for bpa. That is what I would want. If it is a poi t guard, that would be ok. But I don't think you should miss out on a better player just because the team needs a point guard. That's how you end up with Raul Lopez and Carlos arroyo.

Yeah, and a lot of people are also calling for Schroeder at #14.
 
Seems to me like a lot of people are calling for bpa. That is what I would want. If it is a poi t guard, that would be ok. But I don't think you should miss out on a better player just because the team needs a point guard. That's how you end up with Raul Lopez and Carlos arroyo.

Reminds me of when the Bobcats picked up Felton, and past up on Granger.
 
Back
Top