This is what Derrick is doing...this is where champions are built...
![]()
And what is Gordon up to?...
![]()
U shud make a thred fo this cuz its so gud post bro.
This is what Derrick is doing...this is where champions are built...
![]()
And what is Gordon up to?...
![]()
U shud make a thred fo this cuz its so gud post bro.
U shud make a thred fo this cuz its so gud post bro.
Oh I know bro...so freakin good...deserves its own thread and poll probably too just asking who we should keep because we now have proof of who is really working and not working to better our team.
There is already its own thread.......
I'm going to go out on a limb here. If the Jazz can't get McCollum (or Burke), I think there is a 50% chance or more that they're targeting Nate Wolters.
Wolters has the size, the shooting, the IQ, the ability to score from mid-range, the ability to get to the hoop, the ability to work off of picks, the work ethic and coachability. He also rebounds. Plus he's seasoned and almost ready to contribute right away. Schroeder is still pretty raw, and Larkin is still pretty small. Wolters played small-conference ball, but he was guarded by bigger players a lot and dealt with double teams. On top of that, Utah is an upgrade from South Dakota.
Don't say I didn't warn you. It's quite possible the Jazz would pick Gobert and Wolters as a book-end strategy around the core-4. Then they can get a wing or back-up PG at #46, and pick up Aminu in free agency. This is assuming they can't shake things up and move up in the draft.
I'm going to go out on a limb here. If the Jazz can't get McCollum (or Burke), I think there is a 50% chance or more that they're targeting Nate Wolters.
Wolters has the size, the shooting, the IQ, the ability to score from mid-range, the ability to get to the hoop, the ability to work off of picks, the work ethic and coachability. He also rebounds. Plus he's seasoned and almost ready to contribute right away. Schroeder is still pretty raw, and Larkin is still pretty small. Wolters played small-conference ball, but he was guarded by bigger players a lot and dealt with double teams. On top of that, Utah is an upgrade from South Dakota.
Don't say I didn't warn you. It's quite possible the Jazz would pick Gobert and Wolters as a book-end strategy around the core-4. Then they can get a wing or back-up PG at #46, and pick up Aminu in free agency. This is assuming they can't shake things up and move up in the draft.
This. I really hope this is the point guard the Jazz draft in this draft, the only one I would want them to move up to get is Trey Burke. If not I love Gobert at 14 and Wolters at 21 if they can't get two early 2nd rounders for 21.
I'm going to go out on a limb here. If the Jazz can't get McCollum (or Burke), I think there is a 50% chance or more that they're targeting Nate Wolters.
Wolters has the size, the shooting, the IQ, the ability to score from mid-range, the ability to get to the hoop, the ability to work off of picks, the work ethic and coachability. He also rebounds. Plus he's seasoned and almost ready to contribute right away. Schroeder is still pretty raw, and Larkin is still pretty small. Wolters played small-conference ball, but he was guarded by bigger players a lot and dealt with double teams. On top of that, Utah is an upgrade from South Dakota.
Don't say I didn't warn you. It's quite possible the Jazz would pick Gobert and Wolters as a book-end strategy around the core-4. Then they can get a wing or back-up PG at #46, and pick up Aminu in free agency. This is assuming they can't shake things up and move up in the draft.
And the Jazz don't reach for a player in a draft. Ever.
You mean like when they picked Hayward at #9 when most people thought he should go around 15 or 16?
What gives you this impression? Wolters is the most ball dominant of the bunch, and Larkin's a terrific shooter.The other thing is that Wolters can play both on or off the ball. Whereas, Schroeder and Larkin really need the ball in their hands or be the center of the action to be effective.
What gives you this impression? Wolters is the most ball dominant of the bunch, and Larkin's a terrific shooter.
Also, Aminu? Really?
I'm cool with Larkin at #14.As far as PGs are concerned:
I'm cool with McCollum if we can get up to #8 or #9.
I'm cool with Schroeder at #14, but he needs to work on his strength, mid-range and ability to score in the paint.
I'm also cool with Wolters at #21.
I'm cool with Larkin at #14.
Really? I think he'll be lucky to be more than a back-up.
I'm cool with Larkin at #14.
As far as PGs are concerned:
I'm cool with McCollum if we can get up to #8 or #9.
I'm cool with Schroeder at #14, but he needs to work on his strength, mid-range and ability to score in the paint.
I'm also cool with Wolters at #21.