What's new
By:

Another Jimmer trade thread, srs

Jazz Spazz

Jazz Spazz

Inconceivable
Staff member
Based on this ibtimes article by the most reputable journalist on the planet, the Kings could be thinking about trading the Jimmer to either Denver or Utah.
It mentions 2nd round picks as about the value he could go for.

https://www.ibtimes.com/jimmer-fredette-trade-news-sacramento-kings-considering-dealing-sharpshooter-denver-nuggets-or-utah

If this is even an option, the most I would go is the warriors 16 and 17 2nd rounders we have, or one of those and the nuggets 18 2nd rounder.

I hope this satisfies the intense demand we have for insane trade threads and Jimmer threads all in one.

(keep in mind this was written before he blew up last night for 23pts 5dimes 4reb 2stl and 5-7 from 3 last night. He could be worth tons more after that preseason game.)

[flame]
 
JazzSpazz said:
Based on this ibtimes article by the most reputable journalist on the planet, the Kings could be thinking about trading the Jimmer to either Denver or Utah.
It mentions 2nd round picks as about the value he could go for.

https://www.ibtimes.com/jimmer-fredette-trade-news-sacramento-kings-considering-dealing-sharpshooter-denver-nuggets-or-utah

If this is even an option, the most I would go is the warriors 16 and 17 2nd rounders we have, or one of those and the nuggets 18 2nd rounder.

I hope this satisfies the intense demand we have for insane trade threads and Jimmer threads all in one.

(keep in mind this was written before he blew up last night for 23pts 5dimes 4reb 2stl and 5-7 from 3 last night. He could be worth tons more after that preseason game.)

[flame]
Click to expand...

I don't get it... did you just edited this bit in later on? How come it didn't show as an edit then?
 
I still doubt Kings would settle just for a second rounder, but if true I think it would be a no brainer for Utah.
 
Hotttnickkk said:
I don't get it... did you just edited this bit in later on? How come it didn't show as an edit then?
Click to expand...

I sure hope that was bad sarcasm and that you really understood that he meant the ARTICLE in his link had been written before the game and not that the post had been written before the game.
 
Hotttnickkk said:
I don't get it... did you just edited this bit in later on? How come it didn't show as an edit then?
Click to expand...

default said:
I sure hope that was bad sarcasm and that you really understood that he meant the ARTICLE in his link had been written before the game and not that the post had been written before the game.
Click to expand...

Actually Warmmmnickkkk if you edit a post within a couple of minutes it doesn't show as being edited. Just an FYI.
 
homeytennis said:
Jimmer scored 23 points the other night.
Click to expand...

And he started. It's hard to tell what their intentions are by doing so unless they are showcasing him. He has multiple DNPs already in the preaseason which would be odd if they are trying to develop him at all. Seems almost as stupid as Gobert not playing.
 
Duck Rodgers said:
And he started. It's hard to tell what their intentions are by doing so unless they are showcasing him. He has multiple DNPs already in the preaseason which would be odd if they are trying to develop him at all. Seems almost as stupid as Gobert not playing.
Click to expand...

This is Sacramento we are talking about.
 
Jako said:
i would trade for him for a couple second rounders
Click to expand...

Me too.
Contract is pretty friendly and its done after this year if things don't work out (I think there is a team option for one more year)
 
Do you think any of this changes now? I heard he scored 23 the other night.
 
Jimmer could help this team win and make money this year. In the long run he would have a hard time as a rotation player on a great team. But at the right price he would be valuable. Personally I wouldn't pay more than a single 2nd round pick.
 
Jako said:
question: would you give up our next years second?
Click to expand...

No way. I'd give up the GS pick, though. Utah's 2nd may be more valuable than the GS 1st-rounder. Why? Because the player value will be close, but the 2nd-round contract isn't guaranteed. It's likely Utah could trade their 2nd and "future considerations" to move up into the late 20's if they want (i.e. a deal with a contender that is up against the tax line).
 
Core4 said:
No way. I'd give up the GS pick, though. Utah's 2nd may be more valuable than the GS 1st-rounder. Why? Because the player value will be close, but the 2nd-round contract isn't guaranteed. It's likely Utah could trade their 2nd and "future considerations" to move up into the late 20's if they want (i.e. a deal with a contender that is up against the tax line).
Click to expand...

Holy ****ing ****.

Delete your account immediately pls.

Most redonkulous post of the off season, and I have read every one of Orangello's posts.


£¥£
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top