I must be a grade "A" ******* because I don't care how my future food is treated. I'm trying to care, I just can't.
I must be a grade "A" ******* because I don't care how my future food is treated. I'm trying to care, I just can't.
I must be a grade "A" ******* because I don't care how my future food is treated. I'm trying to care, I just can't.
This goes back to my Reagon thing. Why are we trying to get so big? What is the motivation? Was it always there, or did deregulation make it possible?
You should care about the quality of BACON. I'm tired of over paying for decent bacon. They can only charge me so much because there are so few farmers producing it. I like bacon fat but cheap bacon is all fat.
For what it's worth I make my own bacon.
People respond to incentives and their responses have consequences. I think it comes down to having people in power that cannot think through the ramifications of their policies because they neither understand, nor care to understand, that simple truth.
I must be a grade "A" ******* because I don't care how my future food is treated. I'm trying to care, I just can't.
I don't think that. I do think everyone should know this, but if you choose to use meat/milk/eggs anyhow, no big deal.
What not enough people realize is how the animals you eat are treated and what they are fed affects your own health drastically.
You are what you eat eats.
I buy all of my meat in bulk from a local family farm.
If you send me some I'll send you a thank you letter.
There is simply no going back once you start buying local, free-range meat (which happens to be organic in my case).
Tastes ****ing amazing.
Interesting response. Do you think eating eggs from one of these places is the same as eating a free range chicken egg?
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];721337 said:Green...
This history goes back waaaaaaay further than Reagan and his policies. Check out the book Nature's Metropolis for a good history of the beef industry. The whole book is mind-blowing. It's kind of a history of US capitalism. Its focus is on the developmental history of Chicago.
I have not heard an argument where such a distinction can be made objectively. There are so many factors that weigh in here. For example, most of these factory chickens would not have lived without factory farming. So, it's important to know what goes into making your food, but that doesn't imply any judgment about what you do once you know. I'm not going to stop buying factory-farm eggs, but if there is an agricultural reform bill I can vote for, I will vote for it.
I love the ridiculousness of this article. It talks about how they tried to pass a measure in Democrat controlled California, but it was the Republicans who stopped it. It's that type of garbage that makes you lose credibility, undermines your cause and doesn't allow us to actually do anything.
This starts out well, and I think they have good intentions, but then it just turns into another sensationalized article throwing out stereotypes to get people all riled up. Did Thriller write this?
It's too bad, because either we are too dumb as a society to look at a issue and find middle ground, or we just aren't interested in finding a solution. We are just interested in arguing about it.