What's new

I'm gonna be in SLC for nearly one month...

[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];724272 said:
I want you to be very clear.... What is your point? Pleeeze, try to say your point without being an idiot. This will require that you actually read this thread. Thx.

This will be clear:
Trout asked you in two different ways to identify yourself. You did neither. You claim Trout didn't show.
Bitch move by a bitch
 
This will be clear:
Trout asked you in two different ways to identify yourself. You did neither. You claim Trout didn't show.
Bitch move by a bitch

ok, so apparently you are in the upper-echelon of idiot...

for the sixth time: there was no need for me to identify myself beyond the ways I had already identified myself.

Here's an example for you on a sixth-grade level:

Trout asked me to pick a playground where we could meet.

I did.

Then I told him that I was the guy in with an orange shirt, nike shoes, and a backpack.

Then Trout sent a friend to snoop on the playground.

Then Trout sent a message that said, "Are you the dude in an orange shirt, nike shoes, and a white backback? or are the you dude in a orange shirt, nike shoes, and a grey backpack?"

I think to myself, "What a stupid question... there's only one dude here with an orange shirt, nike shoes, and a backpack." And then I think to myself, "who was that midget that came to do his bidding?"

Then Trout sends a message about him lurking in the playground... and refuses to show his face.

Then Trout asks where my bike is... and a bunch of other identifying information... he wants this information but doesn't want to show his face.



OK DUDE. YOU GET IT?!?!? IS IT STILL POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO CLAIM THAT I'M SOME KIND OF COWARD? TAKE A FEW MINUTES TO EXERCISE YOUR BRAIN.
 
This will be clear:
Trout asked you in two different ways to identify yourself. You did neither. You claim Trout didn't show.
Bitch move by a bitch

I wouldn't tell someone from the interwebs the make of my car. Tires is expensive.

What was the second way again?
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];724278 said:
ok, so apparently you are in the upper-echelon of idiot...

for the sixth time: there was no need for me to identify myself beyond the ways I had already identified myself.

Here's an example for you on a sixth-grade level:

Trout asked me to pick a playground where we could meet.

I did.

Then I told him that I was the guy in with an orange shirt, nike shoes, and a backpack.

Then Trout sent a friend to snoop on the playground.

Then Trout sent a message that said, "Are you the dude in an orange shirt, nike shoes, and a white backback? or are the you dude in a orange shirt, nike shoes, and a grey backpack?"

I think to myself, "What a stupid question... there's only one dude here with an orange shirt, nike shoes, and a backpack." And then I think to myself, "who was that midget that came to do his bidding?"

Then Trout sends a message about him lurking in the playground... and refuses to show his face.

Then Trout asks where my bike is... and a bunch of other identifying information... he wants this information but doesn't want to show his face.



OK DUDE. YOU GET IT?!?!? IS IT STILL POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO CLAIM THAT I'M SOME KIND OF COWARD? TAKE A FEW MINUTES TO EXERCISE YOUR BRAIN.

I want to hear Trout's side of the story again tbh
 
I wouldn't tell someone from the interwebs the make of my car. Tires is expensive.

What was the second way again?

heyhey and franklin are the only guys who consistently make sense on this entire board. You all getting trolled by PKM, hotttnickkk, and UGLI. At least you know UGLI is trolling.
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];724280 said:
heyhey and franklin are the only guys who consistently make sense on this entire board. You all getting trolled by PKM, hotttnickkk, and UGLI. At least you know UGLI is trolling.

lol - E.J. alt candidate tbh



Don't let bigb get under your skin. He's going to support trout (as should be expected) and probably has enough history with you on the mod side of things to take this as an opportunity.



It's too bad you and trout didn't use the opportunity to square things up. You're two of my favorite posters on the board (R.I.P. JazzSpazz) and I have no doubt you would get along good if the axe could get buried. Jesus Jammies, NAOS has been BY FAR the most misinterpreted poster on the board.
 
So the title of this thread reads "I'm gonna be in SLC for nearly one month...."


Pretty sure it'll be possible for him to schedule another lunch or join one of GF's poker nights... unless he's too "busy".
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];724280 said:
heyhey and franklin are the only guys who consistently make sense on this entire board. You all getting trolled by PKM, hotttnickkk, and UGLI. At least you know UGLI is trolling.

I think the part of the equation you are missing is that Trout is not some mastermind trying to trick you.

This whole story boils down to two spazz's that couldn't muster up the ability to be in the same place at the same time even though they were both trying.

LOL
 
I think the part of the equation you are missing is that Trout is not some mastermind trying to trick you.

This whole story boils down to two spazz's that couldn't muster up the ability to be in the same place at the same time even though they were both trying.

LOL

In this, the golden age of the cellphone, no less.
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];724278 said:
ok, so apparently you are in the upper-echelon of idiot...

for the sixth time: there was no need for me to identify myself beyond the ways I had already identified myself.

Here's an example for you on a sixth-grade level:

Trout asked me to pick a playground where we could meet.

I did.

Then I told him that I was the guy in with an orange shirt, nike shoes, and a backpack.

Then Trout sent a friend to snoop on the playground.

Then Trout sent a message that said, "Are you the dude in an orange shirt, nike shoes, and a white backback? or are the you dude in a orange shirt, nike shoes, and a grey backpack?"

I think to myself, "What a stupid question... there's only one dude here with an orange shirt, nike shoes, and a backpack." And then I think to myself, "who was that midget that came to do his bidding?"

Then Trout sends a message about him lurking in the playground... and refuses to show his face.

Then Trout asks where my bike is... and a bunch of other identifying information... he wants this information but doesn't want to show his face.



OK DUDE. YOU GET IT?!?!? IS IT STILL POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO CLAIM THAT I'M SOME KIND OF COWARD? TAKE A FEW MINUTES TO EXERCISE YOUR BRAIN.

I want to hear Trout's side of the story again tbh

If this is true what Size is saying then I would have to side with Size. Admittedly I haven't read the whole thread though. So like Ugli said, I would like to hear Trouts side. Because, I wouldn't give him the info either if was acting all weird.

if I had to guess, by the way it sounds, Trout and PKM probably got together and scoped it out. They decided that Size looked like a tool and didnt want to meet with him so they decided to jerk with him a little before they left.
 
I think the part of the equation you are missing is that Trout is not some mastermind trying to trick you.

This whole story boils down to two spazz's that couldn't muster up the ability to be in the same place at the same time even though they were both trying.

LOL

@hack No, this is what happened^
 
@hack No, this is what happened^

Doesn't this just sound like a blind date that one side was not interested in the other so now its a bunch weird stories because someone is lying? Its a supposed mix up, but I have a hard time believing it was an honest mix up.

@PKM. What does Size look like?

Im kind of thinking he had some crazy makeup on and crazy clothes. So PKM was like damn, not only is he unstable but he is crazy looking too.

or scenario #2 , Size is really scary looking. So scary + unstable = PKM and Trout run.

or scenario #3, Size chickened out at the last minute because of how scary Trout and PKM look, so he sends back confusing messages and lies about this whole thing..

Objection your Honor

Sustained

 
I guess its possible that neither side wanted to meet each other so they both acted weird at the last minute and purposely effed it up.
 
If this is true what Size is saying then I would have to side with Size. Admittedly I haven't read the whole thread though. So like Ugli said, I would like to hear Trouts side. Because, I wouldn't give him the info either if was acting all weird.

if I had to guess, by the way it sounds, Trout and PKM probably got together and scoped it out. They decided that Size looked like a tool and didnt want to meet with him so they decided to jerk with him a little before they left.

Sadly, not a single thing he posted is true. Not one single thing. As for PKM being there, that was total luck (it is about 100 feet from PKM's office, but whatever) and when PKM told me he was there, I actually told him to F off because I thought he was in cahoots with NAOS and they were both screwing with me. So, I was not there with a buddy, NAOS refused to identify himself (he wasn't the only guy in the room, tbtfhwy) and when I finally narrowed it down to the two people I thought it could be, he wouldn't confirm that he was the bitch on the laptop. No worries though, because it all happened just as I expected. (Except, I didn't think he'd show at all, so he does get half a prop for that, I guess.)

Saved me from shredding up my knuckles I guess. Silver lining, bros.
 
Sadly, not a single thing he posted is true. Not one single thing. As for PKM being there, that was total luck (it is about 100 feet from PKM's office, but whatever) and when PKM told me he was there, I actually told him to F off because I thought he was in cahoots with NAOS and they were both screwing with me. So, I was not there with a buddy, NAOS refused to identify himself (he wasn't the only guy in the room, tbtfhwy) and when I finally narrowed it down to the two people I thought it could be, he wouldn't confirm that he was the bitch on the laptop. No worries though, because it all happened just as I expected. (Except, I didn't think he'd show at all, so he does get half a prop for that, I guess.)

Saved me from shredding up my knuckles I guess. Silver lining, bros.

LOL wtf so you were there at George's and NAOS wouldn't say exactly who he was??

I wanna see some text messages!!
 
LOL wtf so you were there at George's and NAOS wouldn't say exactly who he was??

I wanna see some text messages!!

So this ^^


Technology is so great. Screenshot them texts bitches. Lets see who is a man of his word.

Dont chicken out.
 
Back
Top