This will be clear:
Trout asked you in two different ways to identify yourself. You did neither. You claim Trout didn't show.
Bitch move by a bitch
ok, so apparently you are in the upper-echelon of idiot...
for the sixth time: there was no need for me to identify myself beyond the ways I had already identified myself.
Here's an example for you on a sixth-grade level:
Trout asked me to pick a playground where we could meet.
I did.
Then I told him that I was the guy in with an orange shirt, nike shoes, and a backpack.
Then Trout sent a friend to snoop on the playground.
Then Trout sent a message that said, "Are you the dude in an orange shirt, nike shoes, and a white backback? or are the you dude in a orange shirt, nike shoes, and a grey backpack?"
I think to myself, "What a stupid question... there's only one dude here with an orange shirt, nike shoes, and a backpack." And then I think to myself, "who was that midget that came to do his bidding?"
Then Trout sends a message about him lurking in the playground... and refuses to show his face.
Then Trout asks where my bike is... and a bunch of other identifying information... he wants this information but doesn't want to show his face.
OK DUDE. YOU GET IT?!?!? IS IT STILL POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO CLAIM THAT I'M SOME KIND OF COWARD? TAKE A FEW MINUTES TO EXERCISE YOUR BRAIN.