What's new
By:

#prayforstoked

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 848
  • Start date Start date
UGLI baby said:
Holy **** dude. I expect it from homer extraordinare stoked, but there is no way you believe any of the **** you are saying.
Click to expand...

I have always felt like the best team in the nfl often does not win the championship...... has nothing to do with this years game.

I really like the way nba mlb and hockey crown thier champs..... and i get the reasons why the nfl doesnt do a series to win a title, but i wish they could.

For the record if the seahawks played denver this sunday i would bet on the seahawks..... and not be surprised if i lost the bet
 
UGLI baby said:
I srs could've never imagined a scenario where ppl would argue the better team lost the Supersbowl 43-8.

I continue to be baffled.
Click to expand...

Is someone saying the better team lost?

I think all stoked or myself has said is that the broncos and seahawks are not so far apart from each other as the final score would indicate.
 
fishonjazz said:
Is someone saying the better team lost?

I think all stoked or myself has said is that the broncos and seahawks are not so far apart from each other as the final score would indicate.
Click to expand...

That is not what I have gotten from Stoked's posts at all.

I think Stoked thinks bronos are the better team and just didn't want to win the game or thought it was a best of 3 series or something.

Am I wrong Stoked? You think bronies are the better team right?

IB4Stoked says there is not enough data to know who was better even though they literally just played each other in the Superbowl.
 
I think the seahawks played in the tougher conference in the tougher(est?) Division and had the toughest path to the superb owl and then dominated the broncos.

I beleive if the seahawks play thier best game then another teams best game would not be enough.

This year i think the best team one the superbowl...... but i dont think that is always the case in the nfl
 
fishonjazz said:
I think the seahawks played in the tougher conference in the tougher(est?) Division and had the toughest path to the superb owl and then dominated the broncos.

I beleive if the seahawks play thier best game then another teams best game would not be enough.

This year i think the best team one the superbowl...... but i dont think that is always the case in the nfl
Click to expand...

You take a midday Ambian bro?
 
UGLI baby said:
Agreed.

I really can't believe I'm having to point this out, but the difference between Regular Season games and Playoff games in the NFL could not be bigger.

When its win or go home, whoever wins gets bragging rights. Period.
Click to expand...

Agreed. But that is not the original case you made. Nor is it what we have been talking about.
 
Stoked said:
Agreed. But that is not the original case you made. Nor is it what we have been talking about.
Click to expand...

What the hell else have I been talking about then?

This whole thing started cuz you said bronies only lost because they played scared.

You still think bronos are better than the Seahawks.
 
UGLI baby said:
What the hell else have I been talking about then?

This whole thing started cuz you said bronies only lost because they played scared.

You still think bronos are better than the Seahawks.
Click to expand...

This all started when you claimed one team was vastly superior to the other. I said basing that off one game is dumb. One game is simply to small a sample size.

Seattle won the Superbowl, good for them, and they have bragging rights.

I think that at that roughly equal level of talent one game is not enough to claim who is clearly better. No matter which team you pick. This has been said by me and fish and others seem to have grasped that (such as Dala and Trout) but not you. (see fishes examples lol)

The Broncos did play scared and that contributed to their loss. It is not the only reason they lost. If I came off that way then that is my mistake.
 
Stoked said:
This all started when you claimed one team was vastly superior to the other. I said basing that off one game is dumb. One game is simply to small a sample size.

Seattle won the Superbowl, good for them, and they have bragging rights.

I think that at that roughly equal level of talent one game is not enough to claim who is clearly better. No matter which team you pick. This has been said by me and fish and others seem to have grasped that (such as Dala and Trout) but not you. (see fishes examples lol)

The Broncos did play scared and that contributed to their loss. It is not the only reason they lost. If I came off that way then that is my mistake.
Click to expand...

This does not help your case...
 
UGLI baby said:
100,000,000% positive fish joined in cuz he felt bad for you. Fish is srs too nice of a dude.
Click to expand...

Not 100% right but not all that wrong either
 
The Broncos were clearly outmatched by a far superior team. I thought they were lucky to be there as it was, and would have taken several NFC teams over them (i.e. 9ers, Carolina, Green Bay). Probably the only reason they made it was because it's hard to beat the same team twice in one season & both Chargers and Pats couldn't do just that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top