What's new
By:

Another victim of no bad breeds mentality

VINYLONE said:
Canine fatalities? Sir, please advise if trolling. Also, in regards to your breed claim, please point me in the direction of something I can read and sink my teeth into...see what I did there?

https://nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/dogbites/dog-bite-related-fatalities/
Click to expand...

The authors were only able to identify the breeds of about 10% of the dogs through registration papers, many years after most incidents. A) How does this disprove massive media reports of pitbull attacks, B) why leave out the brutalizing of many helpless victims who are scarred for life but are saved by the medical system?


1300495.jpg


This child doesn't care that the researchers couldn't find papers on his attacker.
 
Just got me a Rotlab puppy. My girls named her Nana after the dog on Disney's Peter Pan.
 
Stoked said:
Just got me a Rotlab puppy. My girls named her Nana after the dog on Dinsey's Peter Pan.
Click to expand...

Awesome.... good breed choice too.
Im jealous now :-) (im a big time dog lover)
 
fishonjazz said:
Awesome.... good breed choice too.
Im jealous now :-) (im a big time dog lover)
Click to expand...

Yeah I am a big fan of Labs and my wife loves Rots. Nana seemed like the perfect choice. We both got what we wanted and so the kids got to name her. I've had dogs my whole life. This is our second, the other is a mutt named Gizmo. He looks (color and size) like a large terrier.
 
Anti-breed discrimination?

Organizers chose the state capitol this week to raise awareness about House Bill 97, which is headed to the state Senate for review. The measure would prohibit a municipality from enacting or enforcing a breed-specific rule, regulation, policy, or ordinance about dogs. Currently, there are 10 Utah cities that outlaw pit bulls or pit bull mixes, according to Natalie Schun with SLC StrutABulls.
Click to expand...
https://www.ksl.com/?sid=28998981&nid=148&title=dog-lovers-walk-to-support-anti-breed-discrimination-measure
 
Stoked said:
That's republicans everywhere, not just Utah. But haha. Nice shot.
Click to expand...

No it's silly. It's government intrusion for Republicans in the state to ban cities from from banning breeds but it's not government intrusion for Republicans from municipalities to ban breeds?
 
heyhey said:
No it's silly. It's government intrusion for Republicans in the state to ban cities from from banning breeds but it's not government intrusion for Republicans from municipalities to ban breeds?
Click to expand...

It's the irony of pounding the states rights drum with one hand while doing the same to towns with the other. Do as they say, not as they do.

Stoked said:
That's republicans everywhere, not just Utah. But haha. Nice shot.
Click to expand...

I don't live everywhere. Gods you're weird.
 
franklin said:
It's the irony of pounding the states rights drum with one hand while doing the same to towns with the other. Do as they say, not as they do.
Click to expand...

First of all the bill is just under review. Second that is the nature of our system. Comparing the relationship between the federal government and states to the one between states and municipalities is silly.

I am probably just as disillusioned with the numb skulls on capital hill as you but that statement is silly.
 
franklin said:
It's the irony of pounding the states rights drum with one hand while doing the same to towns with the other. Do as they say, not as they do.



I don't live everywhere. Gods you're weird.
Click to expand...

Heaven forbid someone expand your idea. Oh the strangeness!!! The horror!!!
 
heyhey said:
First of all the bill is just under review. Second that is the nature of our system. Comparing the relationship between the federal government and states to the one between states and municipalities is silly.

I am probably just as disillusioned with the numb skulls on capital hill as you but that statement is silly.
Click to expand...

Telling people with less political power how to associate with one another is different than the fed-state relations? I get the scale and legal relationship is a bit different, but to write it off as silly while granting all unchecked legal powers to the state is flippant IMO.

You're acting like townships don't have the authority for their citizens to vote their preferences.
 
franklin said:
Telling people with less political power how to associate with one another is different than the fed-state relations? I get the scale and legal relationship is a bit different, but to write it off as silly while granting all unchecked legal powers to the state is flippant IMO.

You're acting like townships don't have the authority for their citizens to vote their preferences.
Click to expand...

Are you making a states rights argument? Why are you arguing on behalf of something you don't believe in? It didn't sound like that was your original position.
 
heyhey said:
Are you making a states rights argument? Why are you arguing on behalf of something you don't believe in? It didn't sound like that was your original position.
Click to expand...

That's all he does. Hahaha.
 
babe said:
It's the curse of having the intelligence it takes to think twice, and notice there's a difference in the result. "Believing" becomes obviously insufficient to the process of thinking.
Click to expand...

Don't get me wrong, I think Franklin* is very smart. I also think he argues from positions he does not believe in all the time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top