![[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]](/data/avatars/m/2/2497.jpg?1511131091){kind=avatar}
Following potential 2014 draftees
- Thread starter Dr. Jones
- Start date
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]
Well-Known Member
I agree with you. My question is how do we get him those kind of touches when we're already playing Hayward, Burke, and Burks?
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];791592 said:
Having multiple guys who can create is not a problem. Burke/Hayward/Anderson/Randle/Favors should be just fine.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]
Well-Known Member
it can be a problem if they don't know how to work effectively without the ball in their hands.
True, Anderson probably goes late lottery.
I cried like a baby when I put down(cancer) my black lab. I am not ashamed one bit about admitting it. I have a golden who is getting up and age and I know in the near future I will have to do the same thing. I have loved all my dogs but my golden is the only dog I got as a puppy. He is a part of my family, he has helped me though some tough times. He is the most adorable loving kind being I have ever met. He is always happy to see me. I know the tears will come no matter how hard I try to stop them. It is going to be ugly. Just thinking about it makes me want to cry.... Ok I am better.
Dogs are great and they love you more unconditionally then any person does. So it is ok to just the river flow when the time comes, you don't lose any of your manhood for doing so.
.
Hantlers
Well-Known Member
You really like Bawse Dawg that much?
Butter
Feathery
Euphoric
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];791592 said:
Play him like Boris Diaw in his Sun's days. I think KA is basically a more talented, longer Boris Diaw. Also, he appears to be developing a 3-point shot much earlier in his career than Diaw did.
If Royce White went 16th overall two years ago after a good NCAA run, Anderson goes at least that high. Yes, this draft is good upfront, but it is just a normal draft everywhere else.
This draft is a little deeper than you give it credit for. I am not convinced, for example, that anyone in last year's draft would even be in the top ten this year. Maybe not even top 12.
Last year was a weak draft. This is a normal draft with 1-2 elite talents in the front.
I didn't perceive these guys as unfair in their evaluations. THis game simply showed a lot of his weaknesses in its worst form.
When I focus on a player I take a blank sheet and and a pen and I write down a lot of quick notes. After seeing the player I summarize the whole notes into a more educated and useful text. Sometimes I revisit scenes because my handwriting indicates something.
I guess they had their full scouting report next to them and during the Stanford game they saw him make a move/or not make a move and they simply x'd the points off the list and made references which playing time they occured so they can make a highlight reel of stereotypical moves.
They use nationally televised games to give examples of stuff they have observed through the season.