What's new
By:

Science vs. Creationism

PearlWatson said:
What do you think my position is?
Click to expand...

Ignorant
PearlWatson said:
species=race?
species=different shape of scull?

C0089485-1760a_Petrus_Camper_facial_angle_eugenics-SPL.jpg
Click to expand...

Skull
 
Darwinian theory is inherently racist:

"Darwin himself thought of certain groups of dark-skinned people as closer to apes than their melanin-deprived counterparts. Indeed, it’s notable that the very people who came up with the theory of evolution and embraced it most passionately—upper-class European men—happened to be the ones who represented the pinnacle of evolution in their own minds. Evolutionary theory still soundly endorses the idea that humans evolved from apes."
Click to expand...
 
PearlWatson said:
species=race?
species=different shape of scull?
Click to expand...

Two of the faces in that picture could not be superimposed over the skulls above them. 50%! It would be even worse if you tried to include more transitional fossils. That's how bad a failure your sources are.
 
PearlWatson said:
Darwinian theory is inherently racist:
Click to expand...

Darwin himself thought of certain groups of dark-skinned people as closer to apes than their melanin-deprived counterparts.
Click to expand...

A lie. Darwin placed the separation of men from other apes well before any separation of the races of men.

Indeed, it’s notable that the very people who came up with the theory of evolution and embraced it most passionately—upper-class European men—happened to be the ones who represented the pinnacle of evolution in their own minds.
Click to expand...

Whereas, the upper-class European men who endorsed creationism considered themselves the pinnacle of creation in their own minds. Racism is racism, and uses any convenient justification, regardless of connection.
 
One Brow said:
Two of the faces in that picture could not be superimposed over the skulls above them. 50%! It would be even worse if you tried to include more transitional fossils. That's how bad a failure your sources are.
Click to expand...

The source was from Darwiniac Eugenicists with their heads up their ape-like asses so of course it was a failure.
 
From Urban Dictionary


1. darwiniac

Pejorative for "evolutionary biologist" made up by Nazi witch and infamous gob****e Ann Coulter because she has got her head shoved so far up her own arse that she can't accept the evidence of evolution.
 
Also Urban Dictionary

1. Ann Coulter

The granddaughter of Adolf Hitler, Ms. Coulter started at a young "girl" playing with toy soldiers, whom she decimated because each one was either Muslim, gay, liberal, or simply "had it coming". She did several hours of selfless volunteer work in high school, aiding in programs in her youth group at Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka, Kansas, the Christian based organization "Focus On The Family", and the prestigious Ku Klux Klan. This lovely woman then excelled onto college at Cornell University, majoring in eugenics. The author of several wonderful books such as "Slander" and "How To Talk To A Liberal (if you must)" are undoubtedly some of America's favorites. She has also started her own religion, Coulterism, where they believe she is Christ coming back in the image of a woman. They use her classic books as their bible.

Actually no. There is only one word to describe this woman (synonyms: see ****)
Ann Coulter is a neofascist **** who will basically do anything that goes by if it has a quarter and a penis.
 
heyhey said:
From Urban Dictionary


1. darwiniac

Pejorative for "evolutionary biologist" made up by Nazi witch and infamous gob****e Ann Coulter because she has got her head shoved so far up her own arse that she can't accept the evidence of evolution.
Click to expand...

I thought a darwiniac was from that cartoon in the 90's.
 
heyhey said:
Thomas Jefferson had SLAVES. Should we just forget The Declaration of Independence?
Click to expand...

You are kinda weak in the comprehension department. I didn't say Darwin was racist although he said some racist things.

Declaration says "all men created equal"

Darwinism says "blacks are closest to ape like ancestor"

So, yes let's throw out Darwinism from the schools, and keep the real science.
 
pearlwatson said:
you are kinda weak in the comprehension department. I didn't say darwin was racist although he said some racist things.

Declaration says "all men created equal"

darwinism says "blacks are closest to ape like ancestor"

so, yes let's throw out darwinism from the schools, and keep the real science.
Click to expand...

slaves!
 
PearlWatson said:
Are you contradicting yourself or what?

You just got through saying "dinosaurs" with wings are ancestors of birds.....
The "archosaur" ancestor was speculated to have lived 250 million years ago...was it able to fly?
Click to expand...

Pearl you are better than that. Archosaur is not a bird. Pterosaur is not bird. Does not matter if it was flying or not - it was not a bird!
Plus first land creatures ( amphibians ) appeared millions of years before archosaurs or pterosaurs.
 
One Brow said:
No, it doesn't. Another lie.
Click to expand...

There's a lot of whitewashing of the past going on here.

The whites are, in genetic terms, the mutants with the dysfunctional or disabled genes who can't make the melanin in sufficient quantities for meaningful protection against the sun.

Every "proper scientific" explanation of the the origin of man I've seen tracks him back to Africa, to the same area even now inhabited by both apes and black men.

And oh, by the way, I find the studies of Ape behavior very interesting. I don't see why anyone should think being an Ape is an insult. I don't even get mad if someone says I am like my cows/bulls. I love all of God's creatures.
 
babe said:
There's a lot of whitewashing of the past going on here.

The whites are, in genetic terms, the mutants with the dysfunctional or disabled genes who can't make the melanin in sufficient quantities for meaningful protection against the sun.

Every "proper scientific" explanation of the the origin of man I've seen tracks him back to Africa, to the same area even now inhabited by both apes and black men.
Click to expand...

Which allows for more vitamin D production from less sun in non-equatorial areas. Environmental advantage there. Higher rate of skin cancer in equatorial areas. Environmental disadvantage there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top