What's new

Yesterday - Bundy Ranch

That is 100% false. That was never said and there was not one single woman near the hot action.

Some character by the name of Sherrif Mack did say that. He was commenting on a hypothetical situation of escalation:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/apr/15/former-sheriff-willing-let-wife-daughter-die-front/

Appearing on Fox News’ “The Real Story” on Monday, former Sheriff Richard Mack said he and other protesters “were actually strategizing to put all the women up at the front. If they are going to start shooting, it’s going to be women that are going to be televised all across the world getting shot by these rogue federal officers.”

“I would have put my own wife or daughters there, and I would have been screaming bloody murder to watch them die,” he said. “I would’ve gone next, I would have been the next one to be killed. I’m not afraid to die here. I’m willing to die here.”

“But the best ploy would be to have had women at the front,” he continued. “Because, one, I don’t think they would have shot them. And, two, if they had, it would have been the worst thing that we could have shown to the rest of the world, that these ruthless cowards hired by the federal government will do anything.”


And while I don't think it's a good tactic or should even be contemplated because this situation is not at that level of seriousness to me, but his comments obviously make sense in foggy war mindsets. Drone strikes get nary a mention when a bunch of guys are blown to pieces because the mainstream just presumes men are evil or Al Qaeda members or whatever. It's the woman and children that are presumed good that awaken the mass consciousness.

All these anti-human idiots that are calling the Bundys terrorists for grazing cattle and not paying fees, wouldn't flinch if the Bundy males were murdered. They would celebrate.
 
Mack made that up.. it was NEVER part of any plan.. evidence is when the 200 or so armed militia approached the feds to take back the cattle, no women present.
 
Mack made that up.. it was NEVER part of any plan.. evidence is when the 200 or so armed militia approached the feds to take back the cattle, no women present.

They obviously didn't green light it, but he said they contemplated it. Which really doesn't mean much. Not really any different than the average person planning something. You want a mansion in Monoco.....should you create a ponzi scheme.....or work for it legally? We all go through those type of thinking processes. It's the action chosen ultimately that matters.
 
They obviously didn't green light it, but he said they contemplated it. Which really doesn't mean much. Not really any different than the average person planning something. I want a mansion in Monoco.....should I create a ponzi scheme.....or work for it legally? We all go through those type of thinking processes.

I'm telling you he made it up. He's far from in the know about the goings-on at the ranch. He, more than the actual feds on site, is seen as the enemy. He has said some extremely ridiculous things.. far more outrageous than what I've heard from the militia.

As a reminder, I'm going down there tomorrow if anyone wants to join.
 
I'm telling you he made it up. He's far from in the know about the goings-on at the ranch. He, more than the actual feds on site, is seen as the enemy. He has said some extremely ridiculous things.. far more outrageous than what I've heard from the militia.

As a reminder, I'm going down there tomorrow if anyone wants to join.

Okay, so maybe the wrong impression of him that the media is making publicly is that he actually has a say in the goings on when he doesn't. So mentally separate him and the Bundys. Some guy that has no power was contemplating that strategy with a few guys that also have no power, but nobody would have listened to him anyway. That works. But unfortunately the masses don't have somebody that is close to the situation and can tell them that Mack is a nobody over there if that's really the case.
 
Okay, so maybe the wrong impression of him that the media is making publicly is that he actually has a say in the goings on when he doesn't. So mentally separate him and the Bundys. Some guy that has no power was contemplating that strategy with a few guys that also have no power, but nobody would have listened to him anyway. That works. But unfortunately the masses don't have somebody that is close to the situation and can tell them that Mack is a nobody over there if that's really the case.

It's not that he's a nobody, it's that he's not in the militia camp and the only people that would talk to him would be people just ************.
 
The libertarians that haven't been brainwashed aren't anti union. I consider myself to be libertarian and I think governments position should be 100% neutral in regards to unions. The problem isn't unions it is when the government favors them. Every state tends to right either pro or anti-union legislation when they should just stay the **** out of it. I have been a union member for a job that I worked my *** off for. The company was willing to negotiate with the Union because we had the skills and work ethic they needed.

In response to your comment, I think you are in the minority on this. An overwhelming majority of the libertarians I've spoken with are not union advocates. 'Brainwashed' couldn't be more incorrect. Most don't like unions for basic economic reasons that are consistent across the board. Unions can decrease incentive and raise unemployment. Obviously, this is not an absolute as you stated your union works well. Kudos
 
If you think for one second the Bundy camp isn't breaking the law, you're dumb.

If you think for one second breaking the law is universally wrong, you're dumber.
 
ive_been_brain_washed_cap_hat-r14c0cb68f54948d9b919436ca3f4d936_v9wqr_8byvr_324.jpg

This is missing a Jack Daniels logo.
 
That is 100% false. That was never said and there was not one single woman near the hot action.

PKM, It is all over the internet and you can go to Fox news youtube and see it for yourself. I really think you have lost your mind on this issue. The Washington post has a story on it too.
 
Some character by the name of Sherrif Mack did say that. He was commenting on a hypothetical situation of escalation:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/apr/15/former-sheriff-willing-let-wife-daughter-die-front/






And while I don't think it's a good tactic or should even be contemplated because this situation is not at that level of seriousness to me, but his comments obviously make sense in foggy war mindsets. Drone strikes get nary a mention when a bunch of guys are blown to pieces because the mainstream just presumes men are evil or Al Qaeda members or whatever. It's the woman and children that are presumed good that awaken the mass consciousness.

All these anti-human idiots that are calling the Bundys terrorists for grazing cattle and not paying fees, wouldn't flinch if the Bundy males were murdered. They would celebrate.

Anti-human, now that is funny. I would call them(Sheriff Mack) cowards for even suggesting he would do that. I would be upset if anyone lost their lives but I am not in Nevada with a gun on my belt mixing it up with the gov't. When you have a gun bad things can happen. I don't think Bundy is a terrorists, I think he is breaking the law and should not be allowed to ignore the courts decision.
 
Okay, so maybe the wrong impression of him that the media is making publicly is that he actually has a say in the goings on when he doesn't. So mentally separate him and the Bundys. Some guy that has no power was contemplating that strategy with a few guys that also have no power, but nobody would have listened to him anyway. That works. But unfortunately the masses don't have somebody that is close to the situation and can tell them that Mack is a nobody over there if that's really the case.

So Fox news got it wrong? Who would have guessed? I remember some women being their on the news clip I saw on TV.
 
Back
Top