What I said IS Biblical and NOT counter to biology!
There is nothing in the Bible that defines "kind" as "able to interbreed". There is no Biblical justification for saying there is a Biblical "feline kind" that includes house cats, lions, etc., and a separate "canine kind" that includes dogs, foxes, etc., but that the feline and canine kinds must be different. There is nothing that says all members of a kind must be able to interbreed. If you think you have something, post it. You are taking the opinions of modern men and pretending they are Biblical.
It's funny how you evolutionists want us to accept or believe that with "millions of years of time" these monstrous, galactical changes have take place but when we say that over a period of hundreds perhaps thousands of year certain "varieties" within a kind could be produced....you call us "stupid" and "fairytale believers!"
It's funny that you believe in a faster, stronger, more effective sort of evolution that the evolutionary scientists, while saying evolution is a lie.
Genesis chapter one says that each basic kind could produce offspring only “according to its kind.”
The word "only" does not appear, and is not implied by the text of, Genesis 1. You are adding words to the Bible.
Fish would forever stay fish, birds forever birds, land animals forever land animals, and humans forever humans.
Evolutionary theory says the same thing.
If evolution is true, there should be evidence of the beginnings of new structures in living things. There should have been an abundance of developing arms, legs, wings, eyes, and other organs and bones.
We have evidence of developing arms, legs, wings, and bones (eyes and other internal organs are almost never fossilized
This should be true in the fossil record and even in some living things today. At the very least there should be some partially developed structures somewhere!
There are some.
Much the same observation is made in Science magazine: “Species do indeed have a capacity to undergo minor modifications in their physical and other characteristics, but this is limited and with a longer perspective it is reflected in an oscillation about a mean [average].”
Let me know the next time you see a beagle the size of a Great Dane. This oscillation can happen in nature under changing conditions, but it is not inherent to the population.