What's new
By:

Following potential 2014 draftees

I feel like the Wizards don't really have a number 1 option. They play like a team. They have a lot of plays and passes. Unlike the thunder who play a lot of isos for the number 1 option.
 
Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA 2 Min.
"Joel Embiid and Jabari Parker -- two possible No. 1 overall picks -- will not attend the Chicago draft combine, sources tell Yahoo Sports."

Nice job Jabari!
 
Primetime said:
Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA 2 Min.
"Joel Embiid and Jabari Parker -- two possible No. 1 overall picks -- will not attend the Chicago draft combine, sources tell Yahoo Sports."

Nice job Jabari!
Click to expand...

Lame, even if they are scaredy cats to do the testings they are also missing out on the interviews.
 
Jazz4ever said:
Lame, even if they are scaredy cats to do the testings they are also missing out on the interviews.
Click to expand...

Nothing to see here. Happens year in and year out. They have nothing to gain at this point.
You go to the NBA for the money. Draft spot = cash. No reason to jeopardize a lock to go top 3.
 
Kay you douches-- is there any potential offensively-gifted players that could formidably lead a team's offense a few years down the road, and do a good job of it, at the 5th spot of this year's NBA draft?
 
dalamon said:
Kay you douches-- is there any potential offensively-gifted players that could formidably lead a team's offense a few years down the road, and do a good job of it, at the 5th spot of this year's NBA draft?
Click to expand...

Vonleh, Saric, and Smart are the only candidates, IMO. I really don't know. I think it's a long shot for all of them.
 
I'll say this. Saric might be the best passer in this draft at 6'10. And he scored 17ppg in his league, iirc. Meaning, he might also be an underrated scorer.
 
Agree. I only really see Wiggins and Parker (and maybe Embiid) as possible 1st scoring options on a contending team. LOTS of great prospects though.
 
One thing I've been thinking about lately is how strange Russell Westbrook's rise has been. He only averaged 12.7 PPG as a sophomore in college, and now he's one of the league's premiere scorers. You could look at him and say, "Well, he has elite physical gifts, so he always had the potential in him." But it still seems really strange that he managed to develop that much as a scorer.

Am I way off? What was Westbrook's perceived potential at that time?

I ask mainly because Aaron Gordon strikes me as someone else with those elite physical gifts, motor, competitiveness, work ethic and so on... Is there even the slightest chance that his offensive production could take a similar rise in time? Or was Westbrook's offensive ceiling always viewed as higher than what Gordon's seems to be now?
 
spycam1 said:
Vonleh, Saric, and Smart are the only candidates, IMO. I really don't know. I think it's a long shot for all of them.
Click to expand...
Ditto. The only thing I'm afraid with Saric is his potential to become a bust. I want him turn down all the offers from Euro teams and come to the NBA as soon as he gets drafted. I believe that would increase his chances to become that special player that everyone hopes him to be.

The best basketball vision overall though, belongs to Micic on this year's draft, I'm including Exum, Smart and all the other PG prospects. However he has his shortcomings that will make him probably a second rounder.
 
Enes CanTear You Apart said:
Ditto. The only thing I'm afraid with Saric is his potential to become a bust. I want him turn down all the offers from Euro teams and come to the NBA as soon as he gets drafted. I believe that would increase his chances to become that special player that everyone hopes him to be.

The best basketball vision overall though, belongs to Micic on this year's draft, I'm including Exum, Smart and all the other PG prospects. However he has his shortcomings that will make him probably a second rounder.
Click to expand...

He's projected at 36th overall and we have a 35th pick……

tell me more about this Micic.
 
spycam1 said:
One thing I've been thinking about lately is how strange Russell Westbrook's rise has been. He only averaged 12.7 PPG as a sophomore in college, and now he's one of the league's premiere scorers. You could look at him and say, "Well, he has elite physical gifts, so he always had the potential in him." But it still seems really strange that he managed to develop that much as a scorer.

Am I way off? What was Westbrook's perceived potential at that time?

I ask mainly because Aaron Gordon strikes me as someone else with those elite physical gifts, motor, competitiveness, work ethic and so on... Is there even the slightest chance that his offensive production could take a similar rise in time? Or was Westbrook's offensive ceiling always viewed as higher than what Gordon's seems to be now?
Click to expand...

For his position though Westbrook had it all, elite athleticism, elite wingspan, elite motor. Aaron Gordon only has 2 of the 3. There was some concern Westbrook would have to play SG, and PG is still not a perfect role for him, but he knows how to physically dominate enough to make up for his occasional bad decision making.
 
dalamon said:
He's projected at 36th overall and we have a 35th pick……

tell me more about this Micic.
Click to expand...

a bit of a poor mans Ricky Rubio, id definitely like to hear what our Euro posters have to say about him. heres a few nuggets though

-he broke his hand this time last month and is expected out 4-6 weeks

-Micic was able to score 24 points in an U19 game last year vs USA against a combination Marcus Smart/Rasheed Suilamon/Elfrid Payton

-his team Mega Vizura obliterated Cibona (Saric's team) in a matchup this year 102-74 he had 18pts, 8 assists, 4 steals
 
spycam1 said:
One thing I've been thinking about lately is how strange Russell Westbrook's rise has been. He only averaged 12.7 PPG as a sophomore in college, and now he's one of the league's premiere scorers. You could look at him and say, "Well, he has elite physical gifts, so he always had the potential in him." But it still seems really strange that he managed to develop that much as a scorer.

Am I way off? What was Westbrook's perceived potential at that time?

I ask mainly because Aaron Gordon strikes me as someone else with those elite physical gifts, motor, competitiveness, work ethic and so on... Is there even the slightest chance that his offensive production could take a similar rise in time? Or was Westbrook's offensive ceiling always viewed as higher than what Gordon's seems to be now?
Click to expand...

Westbrook played alongside Darren Collison (Senior) (had to split shots with Collison and Love) in college at UCLA in a slower paced offense, so he had a lot of factors that were legitimately causing him from not being able to put up big numbers.
 
Cyrone Torbin said:
Westbrook played alongside Darren Collison (Senior) (had to split shots with Collison and Love) in college at UCLA in a slower paced offense, so he had a lot of factors that were legitimately causing him from not being able to put up big numbers.
Click to expand...

Fair enough.
 
dalamon said:
He's projected at 36th overall and we have a 35th pick……

tell me more about this Micic.
Click to expand...

Let me.

He is a pass first PG who has good size at 6'5. Excellent P&R ball-handler. Good dribbling skills. Collapses defenses and finds bigs. Potential to be floor general. Buys into team concept both on offense and defense. Totally unselfish on offense and knows where to stand on defense. Helps and rotates back . Great off-ball defending. Needs to improve his lateral speed to be good on-ball defender. Has somewhat nba range.

Buuuut He is TO prone. Forces easy plays sometimes. Loses control. Can't create for himself. Bad mid-range game. Around %60FT shooting. Can't defend consistently. Below the rim and bad lateral quickness. Not much upside. Could be a great back-up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top