What's new

Mark Cuban's afraid of the witchhunt. he might think he is next target of the witchunt

is forcing your stupid opinion about gay maraige on me considered negative behavior

Please show me where I forced my opinion on you? I'm just asking you straightforward questions that you refuse to answer. You're very thin skinned, Butch.

I don't care whether you support gay marriage or not. In however many years you'll be known as someone who is or was on the wrong side of history. This is not an assumption, it's a fact.


This electronic post has been constructed, arranged and transmitted via an Apple branded communication device using the Tapatalk application.
 
homo sex uality

Hmmmm. So let's say two men or women who have met in college and are gay virgins decided to have sex. This act of coitus, you consider no better than being drunk, being adulterous or the equivalent of flashing someone?


This electronic post has been constructed, arranged and transmitted via an Apple branded communication device using the Tapatalk application.
 
got homos who can vouch for that

You sound like that one guy who always says, "I can say this because I have black friends."

LOL


This electronic post has been constructed, arranged and transmitted via an Apple branded communication device using the Tapatalk application.
 
but this thread is having a differnt view opinion.
and not being able to express my view on certain things. if i give my view on ssmariage i am a homophobe

How is giving an accurate label to your views preventing you from offering your views?
 
and not being able to express my view on certain things.

Butch, you don't really believe this do you? You sound like a victocrat of the highest order. A martyr for the unknown cause. You know what you should do is start a new thread with the title: I am against Gay Marriage and believe it ruins life

I will bet you 133 krona that you can say whatever you want in that thread with so much of a warning or infraction from the modifiers of this board. You might get some posts from others folks who don't agree with your stance, but that will probably be the worst of it.

If you don't want to do that, I would advise you to cry the **** harder. Stop being a victim.
 
Stop all this discrimination of homophobes, they are people too. Y'all are just bashing gay-bashers.



- Your resident basher of those who bash gay-bashers
 
....can't disagree with you there, Dutch! I'll go one further! If I saw that squad of Heat players walking down the street at night with those 'hoodies" on.....I'd call 911 and scream into the phone:"I NEED HELP! SOMEONE IS TRYING TO KILL ME!!!" Gangsta rap trash shoot each other and others all the time.....true or false? If they have a hoodie on and are walking the streets late at night.....I've got to figure I've got a better chance leaving the scene than walking by them and saying: "Good evening, fellas!"

The difference between Cuban and you, and why he's not a racist and you are, is that he is willing to engage in reasoned discussion and in critical self-reflection about his biases, cognizant that they may be irrational/wrong.

You, on the other hand, are an unrepentant bigot/racist utterly incapable of critical self-reflection or reasoned discussion about your irrational biases.
 
You sound like that one guy who always says, "I can say this because I have black friends."

LOL


This electronic post has been constructed, arranged and transmitted via an Apple branded communication device using the Tapatalk application.

so i have not treath them badly.
even when my friends rag on me for hugging them when i meet them.
 
Thank you for agreeing with me, although I doubt you did so intentionally.

No, I disagree with it. I do not hate homosexuals, I'm not afraid of homosexuals, and I can honestly say I don't treat them any different than any other person. I disagree with the act, but I'm not going to treat the individual any different from anybody else.

Perhaps you think I'm a homophobe, but I know that I am not.

Dutch probably is though.
 
Butch, you don't really believe this do you? You sound like a victocrat of the highest order. A martyr for the unknown cause. You know what you should do is start a new thread with the title: I am against Gay Marriage and believe it ruins life

I will bet you 133 krona that you can say whatever you want in that thread with so much of a warning or infraction from the modifiers of this board. You might get some posts from others folks who don't agree with your stance, but that will probably be the worst of it.

If you don't want to do that, I would advise you to cry the **** harder. Stop being a victim.

let me tell ask you this do you respect my opinion?
my opinion being: that marriage is about the creating a family by conception of live. and since 2 same sex people. so far never ever ever ever ever like 0.0000000000000000000% have 2 same sex persons created live. therefore they can conceive live which means they don't need marriage.

because i respect your opinion
assuming it is something like this:
mariage is a promise that 2 people make to eachother, to spent their live together whether or not creating a family (by natural conception or adoption or whatever). and get beneficial rights/benefits(tax/healthinsurance etc etc).

and i respect that you see mariage as that. i just dont.
and i wont be protesting against gay mariage etc etc.

in short:
ME: procreation is the sole purpose of mariage

YOU: mariage is bond in which a man and a woman come together to create a relationship
 
let me tell ask you this do you respect my opinion?
my opinion being: that marriage is about the creating a family by conception of live. and since 2 same sex people. so far never ever ever ever ever like 0.0000000000000000000% have 2 same sex persons created live. therefore they can conceive live which means they don't need marriage.

because i respect your opinion
assuming it is something like this:
mariage is a promise that 2 people make to eachother, to spent their live together whether or not creating a family (by natural conception or adoption or whatever). and get beneficial rights/benefits(tax/healthinsurance etc etc).

and i respect that you see mariage as that. i just dont.
and i wont be protesting against gay mariage etc etc.

Do I respect your opinion? Sure. You don't need to keep reiterating your stance because I understand it completely. The fact of the matter is that gay marriage does not affect you personally in any way. You can decide to get married to some local Dutch woman with thick ankles and treat your marriage and your wife with the utmost respect, honor and love. You've been able to do this even when gay marriage was not a possibility but there were countless folks, cheating on each other, killing their spouses, abusing their spouses, getting divorces, etc. Those other relationships had about as much affect on your relationship as gay marriage does.

Butch, the only reason I am wary of your position is because many if not most of the arguments you use are the same arguments that were used during the racist times of this country.
 
You simply cannot be a public figure and have your own thoughts these days. It's incredibly creepy. And it's sad he actually issued an apology. He should've issued a "**** off!"

You can have your own thoughts, any number you want. What you can't do (well, you can, but not necessarily without repercussions) is express them all vocally.

Do you really mean to suggest that a public figure should be able to say whatever he/she wants in the public square without any repercussions at all? Clearly there's a line somewhere, but where that line exists, who knows? I wonder where you'd draw it?
 
Loving the eugenic undertones of DutchRudder's posts, particularly in light of his Jewish heritage.
 
You can have your own thoughts, any number you want. What you can't do (well, you can, but not necessarily without repercussions) is express them all vocally.

Do you really mean to suggest that a public figure should be able to say whatever he/she wants in the public square without any repercussions at all? Clearly there's a line somewhere, but where that line exists, who knows? I wonder where you'd draw it?

This is a very simple concept that people just don't understand.
 
ME: procreation is the sole purpose of mariage


I guess if a man has a health-problem that renders his sperm-production as close to zero, then he should be prohibited from marrying any woman.

I guess if a man is partially disabled, then he shouldn't be "procreating" because these genes can be passed onto the gene pool and negatively impact the human race. We only want people marrying to have kids, and we want those kids to have more kids. So if we have kids that can't have kids, those kids are useless!!!
 
Back
Top