What's new
By:

More Chad Ford Speculation: #5 and Favors for #2 and Sanders

So Sanders/Wiggins or Parker

or

Favors/Exum or Vonleh or Smart or Gordon


I dunno guys. I like Gordon a lot. I hope I'm not dumb.
 
If you go up to #2 and it's between Wiggins and Parker. You take wiggins simple as that. Yes Parker might be more "NBA Ready" but that's not what the Jazz absolutely need right now. The Jazz aren't going to turn into a Championship contender next year and one of these 2 isn't going to change that. So you take the one who has to develop into that "NBA Ready" player and when he does develop fully you (should) have the pieces around him to contend.


Sent from the JazzFanz app
 
Core4 said:
Sanders is only going to Denver. He wants that Rocky Mountain High.
Millers would NEVER approve a deal that brought him to the Jazz.
Click to expand...

That's so dumb. If they think like that they are not deserving of owning an NBA franchise.
 
Nate505 said:
That's so dumb. If they think like that they are not deserving of owning an NBA franchise.
Click to expand...

Agree that it's dumb.

The fight doesn't bother me as much. There've been Jazz players in the past who'd been in fights.

I have no place to be judging the weed :)

But the cruelty to animals thing. That gets me. That makes me not like this deal.
 
Thee jazz fan said:
Your too dumb for Vermin to wast neg on CF when there's a perfectly good idiot like you who needs it so bad.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

LOL -- Thee JF, why do you have to insult people just because you disagree with them? Just make your point and leave it at that. Why call people names? It's pointless, or maybe it gives you a warm, glowing feeling?
 
Sexual Favors said:
Agree that it's dumb.

The fight doesn't bother me as much. There've been Jazz players in the past who'd been in fights.

I have no place to be judging the weed :)

But the cruelty to animals thing. That gets me. That makes me not like this deal.
Click to expand...

To me the Sanders part is not very consequential. This deal is made if you believe Wiggins or Parker are star quality players, and Favors is at best a fringe all star.

I get objecting to this based on basketball reasons, but if Sanders is a headcase you can Roger Braille his ***. If he actually matures a bit hey, there's a bonus.
 
It really comes down what DL sees in Parker/Wiggins. If he is convinced they are perennial All-Stars you pull the trigger without hesitation. Each draft has Adams/Favors/Ibaka type of guys in late teens and early twenties.
 
I like Favors, but Gobert and Sanders are both better pure rim protectors. Tomic, while not a rim defender, is another quality center that could be on our team soon. You have to take emotion out of the equation. Everyone likes Favors quiet and humble demeanor, but you do this deal.
 
Nate505 said:
To me the Sanders part is not very consequential. This deal is made if you believe Wiggins or Parker are star quality players, and Favors is at best a fringe all star.

I get objecting to this based on basketball reasons, but if Sanders is a headcase you can Roger Braille his ***. If he actually matures a bit hey, there's a bonus.
Click to expand...

True, it isn't about Favors and Sanders. But, you still will have Sanders contract, unless something crazy happens.

Still working through how I feel about this current deal. On a basketball front, I think it makes a lot of sense, but he might be too poisonous an influence for our very young team. Roger Bell'ing him is a lot harder to do when he's on the front end of a $48MM contract.
 
I'm probably the least knowledgable poster on this thread, but Thee Jazz Tard is making me feel pretty damn good about myself.
 
Alright. I've decided. You do this trade. Even if Sanders is a POS who abuses animals, and you have to banish him to Antelope Island, his contract is off the books by the time you extend Wiggins.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top