What's new

Police Power and Racial Tensions in Ferguson, Missouri

Regardless of the social backdrop, isn't the only relevant question at hand being if the officer's action was justified?

As far as if that particular officer is punished, yes. There is no other question.

But the encounter and the culture behind it should be addressed at some point as well. We can't just micro focus on every incident where police can justify why they killed a black man and feel good about our society because technically the shooting was justified.
 
That's murder.

No, I disagree here. If the person who was shot had just been wandering around, it's murder. He headed straight for the police, knife in hand, and was only a few feet away when the gunfire started. It's disturbing to watch, but I can't blame the police for firing here.

This is why body cameras would be such a good idea. Much more often than not, they exonerate the police.
 
I'm not trained in the use of a gun or deadly force, so I'm not going to judge whether, when nine shots are fired in two seconds, it's really possible to decide that the last two, or six, are excessive. I'd appreciate if those more experienced weighed in.
 
I'm not trained in the use of a gun or deadly force, so I'm not going to judge whether, when nine shots are fired in two seconds, it's really possible to decide that the last two, or six, are excessive. I'd appreciate if those more experienced weighed in.

I agree. It's definitely splitting hairs to say that the first five shots were justified but the last three make the cop a murderer. At some point you have to take into account that the officers are humans who are firing lethal rounds into a person they felt was threatening their life. The adrenaline is high and once you make that decision to shoot I'd say it's not uncommon to continue shooting until you finally realize that the threat is gone. I think many untrained people who shoot an attacker fire every round in their magazine or cylinder and often don't realize it until they are told so later.
 
No, I disagree here. If the person who was shot had just been wandering around, it's murder. He headed straight for the police, knife in hand, and was only a few feet away when the gunfire started. It's disturbing to watch, but I can't blame the police for firing here.

This is why body cameras would be such a good idea. Much more often than not, they exonerate the police.

IMO, it's only common sense when the cost/benefit ratio is as good as it is. Lawyers can waste millions arguing over these details with no evidence in hand, and do. . . . totaling a billion dollars a year easy. Put the money into technology and have actual information in real time.

I think every auto ought to have a few cams. . . front, rear, and cab. . . . for the same reason, with sound. "your honor, here's my cam footage of the incident".
 
I'm not trained in the use of a gun or deadly force, so I'm not going to judge whether, when nine shots are fired in two seconds, it's really possible to decide that the last two, or six, are excessive. I'd appreciate if those more experienced weighed in.

I am speculating on the caliber of the round, but in general police use 9mm pistols. The guy that died was a young big guy. It might have taken all 9 rounds to stop him. Especially with most of the shots not hitting vital areas. The bullets into the guys head are what would have stopped him. The other shots might have eventually killed him but to stop him with a 9mm usually you have to hit a vital area.

I have heard stories about big tongan guys shrugging off 10+ 9mm rounds to attack someone only to bleed out later.

Guns are not magically death rays. Shot placement is critical.
 
I am speculating on the caliber of the round, but in general police use 9mm pistols. The guy that died was a young big guy. It might have taken all 9 rounds to stop him. Especially with most of the shots not hitting vital areas. The bullets into the guys head are what would have stopped him. The other shots might have eventually killed him but to stop him with a 9mm usually you have to hit a vital area.

If the cop was using a .357 magnum, then the first shots couple of shots probably would have stopped him.

I was referring to the St. Louis shooting, not the Brown shooting in Ferguson. Brown was shot 6 times, not 9. We don't know where teh bullets hit the guy in St. Louis.
 
I was referring to the St. Louis shooting, not the Brown shooting in Ferguson. Brown was shot 6 times, not 9. We don't know where teh bullets hit the guy in St. Louis.

The principle is the same- especially with smaller caliber pistol it can take a lot of rounds to stop someone.
 
I am speculating on the caliber of the round, but in general police use 9mm pistols. The guy that died was a young big guy. It might have taken all 9 rounds to stop him. Especially with most of the shots not hitting vital areas. The bullets into the guys head are what would have stopped him. The other shots might have eventually killed him but to stop him with a 9mm usually you have to hit a vital area.

If the cop was using a .357 magnum, then the first shots couple of shots probably would have stopped him.


I tend to think that round choice is over-hyped. 9mm rounds are not low power or ineffective at all, especially +p varieties.

Law enforcement agencies have tried .40cal and .45acp, the FBI even tried 10mm, then returned to 9mm. It's a damn good round, if you ask me.

You start shooting a .357 and that first shot that misses the mark will be your best one as the next few end up going high. 9mm is good for follow up shots.
 
I grew up with several guys who went on to be cops and while I haven't spoken to them about this subject I can remember more than one saying if they make the decision to shoot someone they're emptying their gun.
 
I tend to think that round choice is over-hyped. 9mm rounds are not low power or ineffective at all, especially +p varieties.

Law enforcement agencies have tried .40cal and .45acp, the FBI even tried 10mm, then returned to 9mm. It's a damn good round, if you ask me.

You start shooting a .357 and that first shot that misses the mark will be your best one as the next few end up going high. 9mm is good for follow up shots.

All depends on the shooter and gun in question. But we are getting far afield. It is plausible that it can take that many rounds to stop an adult male.
 
All depends on the shooter and gun in question. But we are getting far afield. It is plausible that it can take that many rounds to stop an adult male.
granted
 
Wow, okay. I'm pretty liberal about the amount of force a cop should be able to use in this situation. This is going to sound insensitive, but they should've been given freedom, for lack of a better word, to shoot to kill imo.

That said, those last 2-4 rounds are well after the guy has fallen to the ground. Especially the last two. Just way excessive imo.

Now, based on the state of mind of the officers, their adrenaline, the victim's criminal history if he has one, his bio (could be schizo or something based on some of the nutty **** he was saying), things of that nature, I'm not sure you could or should charge these cops with murder or the like. Maybe. That's a tough call. I think I'd lean toward no, though. But as the Chief of Police of St. Louis, I would be thinking long and hard about suspending these cops indefinitely, probably with pay. And a firing isn't out of the question.

If I'm these cops, I would be fearing for me and my family's life for eternity.

Basically for me, it's excessive but I can rationalize it and therefore don't find it criminal.
 
Wow, okay. I'm pretty liberal about the amount of force a cop should be able to use in this situation. This is going to sound insensitive, but they should've been given freedom, for lack of a better word, to shoot to kill imo.

That said, those last 2-4 rounds are well after the guy has fallen to the ground. Especially the last two. Just way excessive imo.

Now, based on the state of mind of the officers, their adrenaline, the victim's criminal history if he has one, his bio (could be schizo or something based on some of the nutty **** he was saying), things of that nature, I'm not sure you could or should charge these cops with murder or the like. Maybe. That's a tough call. I think I'd lean toward no, though. But as the Chief of Police of St. Louis, I would be thinking long and hard about suspending these cops indefinitely, probably with pay. And a firing isn't out of the question.

If I'm these cops, I would be fearing for me and my family's life for eternity.

Basically for me, it's excessive but I can rationalize it and therefore don't find it criminal.


If the person was dead (or would have died) from the seventh shot, is a person a murderer for firing two more shots? It is not at all uncommon for a person in a life of death situation to continue shooting until they run out of rounds. When asked later they often say they shot two or three times and are surprised that they shot 10-12 times.
 
Wow, okay. I'm pretty liberal about the amount of force a cop should be able to use in this situation. This is going to sound insensitive, but they should've been given freedom, for lack of a better word, to shoot to kill imo.

That said, those last 2-4 rounds are well after the guy has fallen to the ground. Especially the last two. Just way excessive imo.

Now, based on the state of mind of the officers, their adrenaline, the victim's criminal history if he has one, his bio (could be schizo or something based on some of the nutty **** he was saying), things of that nature, I'm not sure you could or should charge these cops with murder or the like. Maybe. That's a tough call. I think I'd lean toward no, though. But as the Chief of Police of St. Louis, I would be thinking long and hard about suspending these cops indefinitely, probably with pay. And a firing isn't out of the question.

If I'm these cops, I would be fearing for me and my family's life for eternity.

Basically for me, it's excessive but I can rationalize it and therefore don't find it criminal.

This is where I think the body cam would play a role. When the guy went down he looked at first like he stumbled. From the perspective of the cop closest to him it may have appeared the guy was lunging at him, which would heighten the tension and cause him to squeeze off 2 more rounds easily without thinking about it.

Just for fun, for lack of a better term, I was able to talk to a friend of mine in the Sparks police department this morning who I know has been involved in a fatal shooting before (he used to be a cop in L.A., rarely do cops in Reno or Sparks have to draw like that) and he told me that he hadn't seen the footage but that if a perpetrator was coming at him with a weapon (knife or gun or bat or whatever) and wouldn't respond at all to instructions and was yelling "shoot me" then turned and came at him, he would empty at least half of his clip, due to training and experience. He said they train to put between 3 and 9 rounds on target in a matter of seconds and I have seen this guy at the range, and he is an excellent shot. He could easily put 6 or 8 rounds within a few seconds in a space the size of a dinner plate on a moving target at 20 feet or so. He said they train until it is ingrained, and little thought is required.

I do remember him telling me about his shooting he was involved in. After the fact he guessed he had shot 3 or 4 rounds, but in reality had come within 1 round of emptying his gun. In the heat of the moment I doubt that counting rounds is on their mind at all, and stopping the perpetrator is.

I guess personally the only experience I have with this is my martial arts training. As I have mentioned on the board before, in my mid-20's to mid-30's I was fairly heavily involved in krav maga. Some things get drilled into you so much in that type of training that it becomes second nature. When I was about 30 or so I was just wrestling around with some friends at a picnic/reunion of sorts one summer when I had been training pretty frequently thinking about entering an open form tournament (precursor to MMA I guess you would say) and one guy got behind me and tried to put on like a chokehold. I just reacted, got ahold of his wrist, spun under and away and came back up with an elbow to his face, breaking his nose. I didn't mean to do it, and didn't even think about it, it just happened so fast I couldn't really stop myself. I felt terrible about it. I figure for the cops it has to be very similar, that when the moment strikes the training and muscle memory take over and what happens happens.

It isn't in any way an excuse for poor judgement or letting a situation get away from them before it ends up being a fatal decision, but I can understand how once the thing starts they may have fired 2-4 rounds that may to us seem excessive.


edit: Had to add this edit...I didn't seek out my friend, I actually ran into him at Maverik on my way to work...he was getting donuts. No joke. We had a good laugh about that. :)
 
Wow, okay. I'm pretty liberal about the amount of force a cop should be able to use in this situation. This is going to sound insensitive, but they should've been given freedom, for lack of a better word, to shoot to kill imo.

That said, those last 2-4 rounds are well after the guy has fallen to the ground. Especially the last two. Just way excessive imo.

Now, based on the state of mind of the officers, their adrenaline, the victim's criminal history if he has one, his bio (could be schizo or something based on some of the nutty **** he was saying), things of that nature, I'm not sure you could or should charge these cops with murder or the like. Maybe. That's a tough call. I think I'd lean toward no, though. But as the Chief of Police of St. Louis, I would be thinking long and hard about suspending these cops indefinitely, probably with pay. And a firing isn't out of the question.

If I'm these cops, I would be fearing for me and my family's life for eternity.

Basically for me, it's excessive but I can rationalize it and therefore don't find it criminal.

One has to also look at the amount of time that lapsed form the first shot to the last shot. Also the time between shots. All of the shots are in extremely quick succession in this case. They did not shoot him 3-4 times, wait then shoot him 2 more then wait and shoot him another 3-4 times. They shot all the rounds within what 3-5 seconds? That is insanely fast in real time when a man is coming at you with a knife. Especially after the warned him repeatedly to show his hands and drop the knife. The man then advances on one of the officers and when he is within 4-5 feet.

I have watched this with an ex-officer and he stated two things.

1. 21 foot rule for an individual with a weapon. Cops don't want them within 21 feet. This man was entering lounging distance and was 5 feet(?) away.

2. The cuffing after the shooting, that is training and procedure. Officers shoot to eliminate the threat he said and cuffing is part of that. He then cited officers that failed to cuff a suspect that had been shot and end up getting killed with the suspect grabs their gun as they approach. Thsi is also why the other officer has his gun trtained on the suspect while his partner cuffs the suspect.

I thought the cuffing part was interesting.

Now I have not counted the bullets fired but 9 is being used in this thread. Well we have two shooters. So that is 4.5 rounds per officer, less rounds then it took to kill Mr. Brown (6).

Each officer is independently acting to end the threat. Not waiting for their partner to do so.

I see this as an intentional suicide by cop. This man put the officers into a position where they had to act, they did so. I would not even have them charged with a crime. There will be, and should be, an investigation into the shooting however.
 
If the person was dead (or would have died) from the seventh shot, is a person a murderer for firing two more shots? It is not at all uncommon for a person in a life of death situation to continue shooting until they run out of rounds. When asked later they often say they shot two or three times and are surprised that they shot 10-12 times.

IMO, no. I've conceded that. To play armchair cop and judge what they should do in those tenths of seconds is ludicrous imo. All the training in the world can't totally prepare you for that.
 
My problem with body cams is cost and perception. Hypothetically, one for every cop in this country would cost billions upon billions I would think. And virtually every state is already in massive debt. I also think every single act caught on camera would be scrutinized and cops would be held under the most ridiculous microscope, and in turn, there would be more widespread hate for law enforcement than there already is.
 
Back
Top