What's new

Yes Means Yes law passed

hahahahahahahahahhahah

link
https://news.yahoo.com/california-passes-yes-means-yes-campus-sexual-assault-092512755.html
for you entitled lazy obama loving commies , who cant click on link:

(Reuters) - Californian lawmakers passed a law on Thursday requiring universities to adopt "affirmative consent" language in their definitions of consensual sex, part of a nationwide drive to curb sexual assault on U.S. campuses.

The measure, passed unanimously by the California State Senate, has been called the "yes-means-yes" bill. It defines sexual consent between people as "an affirmative, conscious and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity".

The bill states that silence and a lack of resistance do not signify consent and that drugs or alcohol do not excuse unwanted sexual activity.

Governor Jerry Brown must sign the bill into law by the end of September. If he does, it would mark the first time a U.S. state requires such language to be a central tenet of school sexual assault policies, said Claire Conlon, a spokeswoman for State Senator Kevin De Leon, who championed the legislation.

The bill comes amid mounting pressure nationwide by lawmakers, activists and students on universities and colleges to curb sexual assaults on campuses and to reform investigations after allegations are made.

The White House has declared sex crimes to be "epidemic" on U.S. college campuses, with one in five students falling victim to sex assault during their college years.

Universities in California and beyond have already taken steps, including seeking to delineate whether consent has been given beyond 'no means no'.

Harvard University said last month it had created an office to investigate all claims of sexual harassment or sex assault, and that it would lower its evidentiary standard of proof in weighing the cases.

Under California's bill, state-funded colleges and universities must adopt strict policies regarding sexual assault, domestic violence, dating violence and stalking, among other actions in order to receive financial aid money.

No college or university voiced opposition to the bill, Conlon said.

The U.S. Department of Education in May released a list of 55 colleges -- including three in California -- under investigation to determine whether their handling of sex assaults and harassment violated federal laws put in place to ensure equal treatment in higher education.

The Californian institutions on the list are University of California, Berkeley, Occidental College and the University of Southern California.


and a classic comment on there
From now on anytime I go out in public I will take sex release forms with me for a woman to sign before we even touch or kiss, and of course we would have to sign copies, one for each of us, and one for each of our lawyers, AND fill out a full health disclosure form, once again signed in at least 4 copies.
Better yet, I'll just forget about normal women and only visit professional prostitutes now, much less hassle, no forms to sign, no BS to deal with
 
All it means you don't get to **** her while she is passed out on the couch and get a free card out of jail. Good for them.
 
From now on anytime I go out in public I will take sex release forms with me for a woman to sign before we even touch or kiss,

Wouldn't work, because the lady can change her mind even after she signs. Why do some men feel like they should get to do anything they want, regardless of the lady's current preference?
 
The White House has declared sex crimes to be "epidemic" on U.S. college campuses, with one in five students falling victim to sex assault during their college years.

Such a moral, responsible, highly religious country...
 
I am glad that the White House declared this to be an epidemic. Otherwise how are we to ever know what issues are important if they don't tell us?
 
If a man and a woman drink together to the point of inebriation then have sex who sexually assaulted who?
 
I don't understand what the controversy or "lol"s are about here. Someone care to spell it out to dumb, old me?
 
Perhaps we could enjoy the perspective of a woman on the board. Oh that's right, they don't come here because of the morally repugnant attitudes largely held and manifested here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
If a man and a woman drink together to the point of inebriation then have sex who sexually assaulted who?

If you would be too drunk to consent, you would be too drunk to ask for consent.

On the other hand, if both people are so inebriated as to be passed out (or, to a lesser degree, too inebriated to put together a coherent sentence), how does sex happen in the first place?
 
If you would be too drunk to consent, you would be too drunk to ask for consent.

On the other hand, if both people are so inebriated as to be passed out (or, to a lesser degree, too inebriated to put together a coherent sentence), how does sex happen in the first place?

Happens every day. This is a 100% honest question. Both men and women wake up the morning after with regrets and foggy memories.
 
lol, I was actually going to say whom but wanted to sound more like a man of the people.

So really the only reason I pointed that out was because it was on my mind after a big discussion in my family over dinner one night due to my 12 year old's english assignment. It was kind of funny hearing what everyone thought was the right way to use "whom", then everyone trying to find ways to use it the rest of the dinner, so it kind of stuck.
 
Back
Top