D
Deleted member 848
Guest

This ****ing guy.
I love this ****ing guy.
He is better at Hayward at nothing.
The only reason we got this guy is because of Exum, let's be honest.
Normally I would agree, but I've seen this guy play for Australia quite a few times and he just seems to always be in the right place, at the right time, stroking and hitting that 3pt shot of his.
If he can hit that shot int he NBA I think he could definitely come in handy if Hood is injured and we need 3pt shooters at the end of games.
![]()
This ****ing guy.
I love this ****ing guy.
Normally I would agree, but I've seen this guy play for Australia quite a few times and he just seems to always be in the right place, at the right time, stroking and hitting that 3pt shot of his.
If he can hit that shot int he NBA I think he could definitely come in handy if Hood is injured and we need 3pt shooters at the end of games.
I'm sure he is good, but until you do it in the NBA it's kind of insulting to say he is better than an established NBA starter at anything.
Knowing something about the Nuggets, would you prefer Hamilton or Quincy Miller? Wonder if the Jazz were hoping to get Miller off waivers (though that won't be known until Wednesday), as he's younger/longer/probably more potential, though less production at this point.
Do you do many video analysis? Link pls. tia.
That makes the team
Burke/Exum/Clark
Burks/Murray
Hayward/Hood/Hamilton/Ingles
Kanter/Booker/Evans/Novak
Favors/Gobert
We are heavy on power forwards and small forwards. We could really us another guard.
Not that light at SG. Both Hayward and Hood play both sg and sf.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Oh, there you are, I was starting to miss you.
I'd be 100% on board with dumping Murry for Gal Mekel.
He is better at Hayward at nothing.
The only reason we got this guy is because of Exum, let's be honest.
thanks. any vids?
He is longer, that's a fact, so not going to argue it. Not saying he can use it or anything else but, I'm hundred percent sure that Hayward won't add inches to his wingspan anytime any soon.
The cuts; it's arguable, I've seen many cuts from Hayward the three years I've watched him, he has it. But they were never natural as Ingles can do. To me, it's that way, you can see the other way, I respect that. It's subjective.
Dynamic shooting; well, every basketball player(most players at least) has his own unique thing that they can do very well. For Ingles, this is it. The guy has a good shooting balance and can really shoot the ball off the balance, like while running, after dribble or while leaning sideways. How good is Hayward at these? He even struggled with his spot up shooting for a long time.
I don't know what did I say to get such a strong objection from you but to assure my viewpoint, I will state that I in no way think that Ingles is as good a player as Hayward is. Not even close. If my Hayward Lite phrase made you think that I think that way, forget about it. Gordo is the better player by miles in any kind of comparison.
But you said, let's be honest. I was and still am honest with the things I said.
It's kind of like saying Ian Clark would be a better 3pt shooter than Hayward since his 4 year college averages where off the charts, then he gets to the NBA and he isn't nearly as good a 3pt shooter. The NBA athleticism, size, and strength changes things and some players can't adapt.
I believe he could be very useful here in Quin's fast system. It's very alike with David Blatt's system with Maccabi.What I thought as well. I am surprised that he couldn't find a place in Clippers bench. He should be better then Hedo at least.