The flip side of that argument is we let trees fall in the forests, and leaves, and whatever else there is, just sit there in our pristine "nature" and slowly turn to oil residues, and with the help of bacteria it comes out smelling like the woods we know, and we go there to enjoy "fresh" air and inhale campfire smoke and eat charred marshmallows.
This is an extremely leaky flip-side argument.
You do raise an interesting point with how objective science really is, but that doesn't nullify the obvious danger that fracking raises.
The best way is to go nuclear, in the highest, cleanest, safest way we can. Cold fusion, anyone?
How long will that take? Should we continue to increase rampant fossil fuel consumption in the mean-time? The world can't even figure out the 'easier' form of fusion.
Solar and wind aren't clean energy?
I hate to say it, but I think that pretty much sums it up. As a society, we simply aren't there yet in terms of clean energy. So what are our alternatives?
Here's a really smart guy who knows a lot about the subject. In the opinion of some guy on the internet, I think he has it right.
https://www.wired.com/2013/11/vaclav-smil-wired/
They are but I'm just not so sure they alone can power an economy. I think that there will be a place for them, but I think the extremely fast growth of the world will outpace what they can provide.
What about water? Can we not use water in a way to provide clean energy?
We definitely can. But again, I think it's just such a small part of the big picture.
They are but I'm just not so sure they alone can power an economy. I think that there will be a place for them, but I think the extremely fast growth of the world will outpace what they can provide.
We definitely can. But again, I think it's just such a small part of the big picture.
I would disagree. A coalition of clean energies along with a country-wide emphasis, and concentration on maintaining ecological-integrity would get a lot done.
![]()
This book does a good job debunking this myth. Try and track it down at a local library if you can, and if you're interested.
I would disagree. A coalition of clean energies along with a country-wide emphasis, and concentration on maintaining ecological-integrity would get a lot done.
Solar and wind aren't clean energy?